AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home AIMS Energy Article
PDF (311.4 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Investigating the determinants of ecological and carbon footprints. Evidence from high-income countries

Hazrat Yousaf1Azka Amin2Waqar Ameer3( )Muhammad Akbar4
Faculty of Management & Social Sciences, Department of Economics, Lasbela University of Agriculture, water and marine Sciences, Balochistan, Pakistan
Department of Business Administration, Sukkur IBA University, Sukkur, Pakistan
School of Economics, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai, China
Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Science, Chengdu, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

High-income countries have experienced rapid economic growth, urbanization, consumption of renewable and non-renewable energy, increased trade dependency, and the attainment and maintenance of higher living standards over the last four decades, while also experiencing an increasing trend in environmental degradation. These experiences have fueled our desire to learn more about the factors that influence the ecological footprint and carbon footprint of high-income countries. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the effects of natural resources, urbanization, GDP per capita, population, and fossil fuels on ecological and carbon footprint for 34 high-income countries over the period 2003–2015. Using the STIRPAT model, the results confirm the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in the case of total ecological footprint while the link between economic growth and carbon footprint is in U-shape. In terms of total ecological footprint determinants, population reduction as well as efficient urban design, are viable solutions. The findings support the positive and statistically significant influence of population, urbanization, and fossil fuels on total ecological footprint, as well as the negative impact of ecological efficiency. The findings of the carbon footprint suggest that reduction in coal and oil consumption, as well as increasing the use of gas as a source of energy, are all viable choices to mitigate carbon footprint. Furthermore, increasing ecological efficiency could be a viable policy option for reducing high-income countries' footprints.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
AIMS Energy
Pages 831-843

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Yousaf H, Amin A, Ameer W, et al. Investigating the determinants of ecological and carbon footprints. Evidence from high-income countries. AIMS Energy, 2022, 10(4): 831-843. https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2022037

4

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

4

Web of Science

4

Scopus

Received: 26 March 2022
Revised: 16 June 2022
Accepted: 06 July 2022
Published: 15 August 2022
©2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)