AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Co-composted biochar amendments modulate soil microclimate and phenology to enhance saffron yield under saline field conditions

Shagufta Qasim1Shamim Gul1,2( )Abdul Hanan Buriro3Tariq Ziad4
Department of Botany, University of Balochistan, Quetta, 87300, Pakistan
Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, QC, H9X 3V9, Canada
Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Agricultural College, Dokri, Larkana, Sindh, 77150, Pakistan
Soil and Water Testing Laboratory, Agricultural Research Institute, Quetta, 87300, Pakistan
Show Author Information

Abstract

A two-year field study was conducted in soils with low and high electrical conductivity (EC): 0.25 dS m–1, and 1.95 dS m–1 respectively). The high EC soil was transported from agricultural land. Composted manures obtained from sheep/goat (SG), dairy (FYM), and poultry (PM) farms and manures co-composted with biochar made from Acacia nilotica L. wood (SG-B, FYM-B, and PM-B) were added to the soil for two consecutive years. The influence of these organic fertilizers on soil properties, flowering period, and fresh yield of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) stigma was examined. Analysis of soil collected after the harvest of the second-year crop revealed that organic fertilizers caused a significant two- to fourfold increase in the concentration of potassium and bioavailable phosphorus in both low EC soil and high EC soil. After two years of cropping, the EC of high EC soil dropped to 0.94 to 1.71 dS m–1 under various treatments. In the low EC soil, FYM-B triggered 2–3 days of early flowering in both cropping years. However, this prolonged flowering period did not cause any increase in stigma yield. Furthermore, in this soil, for the first-year crop, all organic fertilizers reduced stigma yield by 41–44% compared with control treatment, whereas no difference among treatments was observed for the second-year crop. The stigma yield in the high EC control soil was significantly lower than in the low EC control soil by 26% and 56% for the first- and second-year crops, respectively. In high EC soil, no difference among treatments was observed in the stigma yield of the first-year crop. However, for the second-year crop in the high EC soil, all organic fertilizers prolonged the flowering period; moreover, the FYM and PM treatments also increased stigma yield by 78% and 70% respectively (p < 0.05). In conclusion, organic fertilizers influenced the flowering period of saffron and significantly increased the concentrations of potassium by 79%–218% and phosphorus by 187%–455% in the high and low EC soils. The PM in the high EC soil was found to be more suitable for stigma yield and soil properties when applied for two years; relative to control, this organic fertilizer caused the highest significant increase in potassium (218%), phosphorus (371%), and soil moisture (24%) during the critical flowering period. This treatment also prolonged the flowering period and the increased yield of stigma (70%) in the second-year crop in the high EC soil.

Graphical Abstract

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
agrfood-11-01-002-ESM.pdf (788.8 KB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
AIMS Agriculture and Food
Pages 17-39

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Qasim S, Gul S, Buriro AH, et al. Co-composted biochar amendments modulate soil microclimate and phenology to enhance saffron yield under saline field conditions. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2026, 11(1): 17-39. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2026002

305

Views

26

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 27 December 2025
Revised: 24 January 2026
Accepted: 12 February 2026
Published: 28 May 2026
©2026 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)