AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (949.5 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Conventional and eco-friendly aqueous extraction methods of date palm fruit compounds: Optimization, comparison, characterization of the date pulp extract and value-added potential

Naima Belguedj1,2( )Ghayth Rigane3,4Ridha Ben Salem3Khodir Madani1,5
Laboratoire de Biomathématiques, Biophysique, Biochimie, et Scientométrie (L3BS), Faculté des Sciences de la Nature et de la Vie, Université de Bejaia, 06000 Bejaia, Algeria
Scientific and Technical Research Center on Arid Regions (CRSTRA), Campus of Mohamed Khider University, Biskra, Algeria
Laboratory of Organic Chemistry LR17ES08, Faculty of Sciences of Sfax, B.P 1171, 3038 Sfax, University of Sfax, Tunisia
Chemistry-Physics Department, Faculty of Sciences and Technology of Sidi Bouzid, B. P 380, 9100, Sidi Bouzid, University of Kairouan, Tunisia
Centre de Recherche en Technologies Agro-alimentaires (CRTA). Route de Targa Ouzemmour, Campus Universitaire, Bejaia, 06000, Algeria
Show Author Information

Abstract

The extraction of the total soluble solid compounds from the pulp fruit Phoenix dactylifera L. is a major challenge for their valorization in the date fruit industry. However, conventional aqueous extraction methods are limited in terms of efficiency and processing time. In order to optimize this process, this study explores and compares three extraction methods: microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), and conventional water bath–assisted extraction (WAE). The primary objective of this study is to maximize extraction recovery (ER) by performing an optimization using a Box–Behnken design (BBD). The second objective is to analyze the impact of the three extraction methods on extraction recovery, functional attributes, biochemical characteristics, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of the optimized date pulp aqueous extract (DPAE). Results obtained using mathematical models showed significant differences (p < 0.05) between the three methods tested. Optimum extraction conditions were determined as follows: for WAE, a solid/liquid (S/L) ratio of 1/4.68 g/mL, a temperature of 80 ℃, and a duration of 38.63 minutes; for MAE, an S/L ratio of 1/6 g/mL, an irradiation power of 480 W, and a duration of 11 minutes; for UAE, an S/L ratio of 1/5 g/mL, a sonication amplitude of 40%, and a duration of 60 minutes. The MAE method stood out for its extraction efficiency, with ER = 79.90% ± 1.54% and being three times faster than WAE and MAE. It also provided the highest concentrations of total soluble solids (14.33% ± 0.11% FW), total sugars (22.23 ± 0.23 g/100 mL DPAE), and total polyphenols (1.69 ± 0.04 mg GAE/mL DPAE). The antioxidant activity of DPAE was high, with an IC50 of 729.80 ± 12.87 μg/mL of the methanolic extract. These results suggest that the optimization of extraction processes, particularly using microwave technology, could offer promising prospects for the valorization of date fruit products by improving the production efficiency of a natural and nutritious DPAE, potentially beneficial to the date fruit industry in terms of product quality and cost reduction.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
AIMS Agriculture and Food
Pages 218-246

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Belguedj N, Rigane G, Salem RB, et al. Conventional and eco-friendly aqueous extraction methods of date palm fruit compounds: Optimization, comparison, characterization of the date pulp extract and value-added potential. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2025, 10(1): 218-246. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2025012

7

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 10 November 2024
Revised: 21 March 2025
Accepted: 28 March 2025
Published: 15 March 2025
©2025 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)