AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (572 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Effect of cultivar and drying methods on phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity in olive (Olea europaea L.) leaves

Itxaso Filgueira-Garro1,2( )Carolina González-Ferrero3Diego Mendiola1María R. Marín-Arroyo2
Department of Research and Development, URZANTE, 31500 Tudela, Spain
Institute on Innovation and Sustainable Development in Food Chain (IS-FOOD), Public University of Navarre (UPNA), Campus Arrosadía, 31006 Pamplona, Spain
National Centre for Food Technology and Safety, CNTA, NA 134, Km. 53, 31570, San Adrián, Spain
Show Author Information

Abstract

Up to 5% of the total olive weight arriving at the mill is discarded as leaves. Interest in the possible uses of these residues is growing, because they constitute a potential cheap and abundant source of compounds with high total antioxidant capacity (TAC) associated with total phenolic content (TPC) and biophenols such as hydroxytyrosol (HC) and oleuropein (OC), which could be used as nutraceuticals or as natural substitutes for synthetic antioxidants. However, studies that characterize specific cultivars, interannual variability, and different drying methods are lacking. This work investigates the TAC, TPC, HC and OC in olive (Olea europaea L.) leaves under four drying methods (vacuum-drying, oven-drying, freeze-drying and air-drying). Leaves were collected from cultivars 'Arbequina' grown under organic methods and from 'Arroniz', 'Empeltre', 'Arbosana', 'Picual' and 'Arbequina' grown under conventional systems. Among fresh samples, 'Arbosana' leaves presented the highest TPC (34.0 ± 1.1 mg gallic acid equivalents/g dry weight (DW)) and TAC (146 ± 20 μmol Trolox equivalents/g DW) and the lowest interannual variability of the TPC (3.2%). The four tested drying methods were also compared as the effect on TPC, TAC, HC and OC. Freeze-drying and air-drying best preserved TPC and TAC in olive leaves. However, air-drying maintained greater OC (14–40 mg/g DW) than freeze-drying (3–20 mg/g DW). Air-dried ecological 'Arbequina' leaves exhibited the highest TPC and TAC. Consequently, this cultivar presented more valorization opportunities as a source of nutraceuticals or natural antioxidants.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
AIMS Agriculture and Food
Pages 250-264

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Filgueira-Garro I, González-Ferrero C, Mendiola D, et al. Effect of cultivar and drying methods on phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity in olive (Olea europaea L.) leaves. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(2): 250-264. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2022016

5

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

13

Web of Science

14

Scopus

Received: 15 October 2021
Revised: 22 March 2022
Accepted: 26 April 2022
Published: 15 June 2022
©2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)