AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Practical obstacles and optimization paths for mortgage financing of water withdrawal rights as immovable property: a case study of the “Hubei Model”

Jiali Guo1,2,3( ), Zonghao Xia2,3, Birong She4, Hao Wen5, Zhaohong Zhou6, Yang Kong7
Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Hydropower Engineering Construction and Management, China Three Gorges University
College of Hydraulic & Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University
Research Institute of Water Resources Informatization, China Three Gorges University
Liufan Reservoir Administration Office,Jingshan City
School of Business Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
Yichang City Water Resources Management Center
College of Economics and Management, China Three Gorges University
Show Author Information

Abstract

The Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China has established the status of water withdrawal rights as usufructuary rights, providing a legal basis for their transformation into mortgageable financial assets. However, given the contradiction between the dynamic nature of administrative control and the stability of financial assets in the mortgage financing of water withdrawal rights as immovable property, financial institutions still face the dilemma of “dare not lend” in practice. Taking the “Hubei Model” as a case study, this paper analyzes the bottlenecks in this kind of financing in the evolution from confirmation and access to risk management and control by combining the previous experience of its standardized confirmation and registration system and the coordination mechanism of “government-enterprise-bank”. This paper finds that the current Model is subject to macro institutional constraints, and there are bottlenecks in value assessment, ownership stability, risk quantification, and mortgage realization. Given the above bottlenecks, this study constructs an optimization path compatible with public law constraints and financial risk control: locking value through the income method that internalizes positive externalities, supplemented by binary registration and subrogation compensation rules to stabilize mortgage expectations; the risk pricing model based on hydrological probability is utilized to quantify physical risks stemming from water resource randomness. In the stage of mortgage realization, asset exit channels are facilitated by leveraging secondary markets and storage-and-purchase mechanisms.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Economics of Water Resources
Pages 9-18

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Guo J, Xia Z, She B, et al. Practical obstacles and optimization paths for mortgage financing of water withdrawal rights as immovable property: a case study of the “Hubei Model”. Journal of Economics of Water Resources, 2026, 44(3): 9-18. https://doi.org/10.3880/j.issn.1003-9511.2026.03.002

4

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

Received: 29 April 2025
Published: 30 May 2026
© 2026 Editorial Board of Journal of Economics of Water Resources