AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Evaluation for CMIP6 global climate models in simulating precipitation and temperature over the Huaihe River Basin based on rank score method

Qin JU1( )Xiaozan MA1Yanli LIU2Feng YAN3Cuishan LIU2Shiyang WANG1Zhuoxi LYU1Naifeng ZHANG4
The National Key Laboratory of Water Disaster Prevention, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
The National Key Laboratory of Water Disaster Prevention, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China
Nanjing Branch of Jiangsu Province Bureau of Hydrology and Water Resources Survey, Nanjing 210008, China
Wudaogou Hydrology and Water Resources Experimental Station, Water Resources Research Institute of Anhui Province, Bengbu 233000, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

By using simulation data of precipitation and temperature in the Huaihe River Basin from 1985 to 2014 from 22 global climate models (GCMs) of the coupled model intercomparison project in phase 6 (CMIP6), the simulation performance of GCMs was comprehensively assessed by means of a rank score method with seven indexes selected, and the sensitivity of the scores to each index was analyzed. The spatial simulation performance of the selected optimal GCMs was evaluated. The results reveal significant differences in the simulation performance of monthly average precipitation and temperature in the Huaihe River Basin among the models. Overall, the GCMs perform better in simulating temperatures, but there is a general overestimation of monthly average precipitation. The top five models with the best comprehensive rank score are EC-Earth3 (7.83), EC-Earth3-Veg (7.66), ACCESS-CM2 (7.62), TaiESM1 (7.27), and FGOALS-f3-L (7.20). The rank score results for precipitation are most sensitive to the standard deviation, the statistics of Mann-Kendall trend analysis (z), and the slope of Mann-Kendall (β), while those for temperature show high sensitivity to z and β. Different combinations of rank score indexes moderately influence the scores. The EC-Earth3 model, identified as the most optimal, accurately reproduces the spatial distribution of precipitation but performs slightly less effectively for the spatial distribution of temperature.

CLC number: P46 Document code: A Article ID: 1000-1980(2025)06-0012-09

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences)
Pages 12-20

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
JU Q, MA X, LIU Y, et al. Evaluation for CMIP6 global climate models in simulating precipitation and temperature over the Huaihe River Basin based on rank score method. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), 2025, 53(6): 12-20. https://doi.org/10.3876/j.issn.1000-1980.2025.06.002

350

Views

4

Downloads

0

Crossref

7

Scopus

5

CSCD

Received: 04 December 2024
Published: 25 November 2025
© 2025 Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences)