AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Polyphenolic Diversity and Genotypic Analysis of Tea Plants with Different Parents and Their F1 Progeny

Lin YAO1,2,3LüWen PENG1,2,3Hong YANG1,2,3JiaYi RAO1,2,3HaoRan GAO1,2,3QianYi TAO1,2,3NianCi XIE2YingYu CHEN2SaiJun LI2( )ShuoQian LIU1,3( )FeiYi HUANG2,3,4( )
College of Horticulture, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128
Tea Research Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Tea Plant Improvement Centre Hunan Branch/National Small-Leaf Tea Germplasm Resource Nursery (Changsha), Changsha 410000
Yuelu Mountain Laboratory, Changsha 410000
Hunan Provincial Institute of Microbiology, Changsha 410007
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the genetic diversity of polyphenolic compounds in tea plant parents and their F1 progeny, and to elucidate variations in polyphenolic composition among different hybrid combinations, as well as the population structure and genetic relationships of their genotypes, thereby providing support for parental selection and quality improvement in tea plant breeding.

Method

Twelve parental tea plant samples and 87 F1 progenies were used as experimental materials. Twelve polyphenolic polyphenolic indices were determined during 2024-2025, and multidimensional evaluations were performed using methods including systematic clustering, hybrid combination difference analysis, and population structure analysis.

Result

The coefficients of variation for polyphenols varied between 14.50% and 89.34%. Notably, Strictinin (STR), 1,2,6-trigalloylglucose (1,2,6-TGG), epigallocatechin 3-O-(3-O-methyl) gallate (EGCG3″Me), gallocatechin gallate (GCG), and catechin gallate (CG) exhibited high coefficients of variation of 89.34%, 66.45%, 64.22%, 59.34%, and 58.12%, respectively. The Shannon Wiener indices ranged from 1.86 to 4.57, with the highest indices observed for epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), trigalloyl quinuclidinic acid (TH), and gallocatechin gallate (GCG), which were 4.57, 4.45, and 4.23, respectively. In the differential analysis of polyphenolic compounds, the F1 progeny resulting from the cross between HJC and AH demonstrated higher levels of catechin gallate (CG) and trigalloylquinic acid (TH) compared to both parental lines. While the levels of epicatechin 3-O- (3-O-methyl) gallate (EGCG3 "Me) were consistent with those of the parents. Using polyphenol cluster analysis, the 99 samples were grouped into five clusters: Group Ⅰ contained 49 samples, Group Ⅱ contained 26 samples, Group Ⅲ contained 20 samples, and Group Ⅳ and Ⅴ each contained 2 samples. Analysis of population structure based on SNP loci classified the 12 parental lines and 87 F1 offspring into three groups: Group Ⅰ comprised 46 accessions, Group Ⅱ comprised 31 accessions, and Group Ⅲ comprised 22 accessions. Notably, Group Ⅰ consisted entirely of the parental line HJC and its F1 offspring sired by this male parent. The levels of genetic diversity among the three groups were similar. The results of the kinship analysis show that the F1 offspring are more closely related to their paternal parent (♂).

Conclusion

The 99 tea plant accessions exhibited rich genetic diversity. Biochemical component-based clustering divided the 99 tea plant accessions into five groups. CG and TH may exhibit overdominant heterosis, while EGCG3"Me exhibited a largely consistent accumulation pattern between the parental lines and their F1 progeny, with no evident transgressive segregation or pronounced non-additive effects. Biochemical profiling grouped the 99 tea accessions into five groups, while SNP-based population structure identified three genetically similar subpopulations. Genome-wide analyses also revealed that, in the majority of crosses, F1 progeny exhibited greater similarity to the paternal parent.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Scientia Agricultura Sinica
Pages 1760-1774

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
YAO L, PENG L, YANG H, et al. Polyphenolic Diversity and Genotypic Analysis of Tea Plants with Different Parents and Their F1 Progeny. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(8): 1760-1774. https://doi.org/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2026.08.012

113

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 01 December 2025
Accepted: 27 January 2026
Published: 16 April 2026
© 2026 The Journal of Scientia Agricultura Sinica