AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Mechanisms of Composite Interlayer in Regulating Water Infiltration, Evaporation, and Water-Salt Distribution in Saline-Alkali Soil

XiaoLong BAI1Na LIU1JiaShen SONG1GuoLi WANG1WeiNi WANG3JunMei LIU3YuYi LI1,2( )
State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-Arid Arable Land in Northern China (Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences), Beijing 100081
National Center of Technology Innovation for Comprehensive Utilization of Saline-Alkali Land, Dongying 257347, Shandong
Ordos Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Ecology and Resource Protection Center, Ordos 017001, Inner Mongolia
Show Author Information

Abstract

【Objective】

This study aimed to investigate the regulatory mechanisms of different interlayer materials on water infiltration, evaporation, and water-salt distribution in saline-alkali soil, providing a theoretical basis for amelioration of saline-alkali soil.

【Method】

A typical saline-alkali soil from Wuyuan, Inner Mongolia, was selected for laboratory soil column simulation experiments. Four treatments were established: CK (no interlayer), JG (straw interlayer), SC (mixed sand layer), and JS (combined mixed sand and straw interlayer), and the effects of composite and single interlayers on soil water infiltration processes, evaporation processes and salt variation patterns were investigated.

【Result】

When the wetting front moved to 40 cm, the interlayer treatment was 3.5%-10.6% longer than that under CK treatment, and 13.8%-55.2% longer than that under CK treatment when passing through the interlayer. The time of wetting front reaching the bottom of 100 cm under JG treatment was delayed by 780, 540, 120 min compared with CK, SC and JS treatment, respectively. After infiltration, the average soil water content under JG, SC and JS treatments in 0-40 cm soil layer was 22.9%, 18.7% and 21.9% higher than that under CK treatment, respectively. The soil salt content in the 0-40 cm soil layer was 18.6%-29.6% lower than that under CK treatment. The desalination rate under JS treatment in 40-70 cm soil layer was the highest, which was 49.4% lower than that under CK treatment. The salt content under each interlayer treatment in 70-100 cm soil layer was lower than that under CK treatment, and the decrease under JS treatment was the largest. During the continuous 45 d evaporation process, the interlayer significantly inhibited cumulative evaporation. The evaporation under CK treatment was 572 mm, and the evaporation under JG, SC and JS treatments decreased to 194, 235 and 205 mm, respectively, which was 66.1%, 58.9% and 64.2% lower than that under CK treatment, respectively. During the continuous evaporation process of 45 days, the water content of 0-100 cm profile of each treatment decreased with depth. In the 0-40 cm soil layer, the water content under CK treatment continued to decrease with the prolongation of evaporation time, and on the 15th, 30th and 45th days, the water content was 23.4%, 21.0% and 21.6%, respectively. The water content under JG, SC and JS treatments decreased by 14.6%-33.8%, 11.2%-17.0% and 14.9%-30.3% compared with CK treatment, respectively. The decrease of water content under JG and JS treatments was significantly greater than that under SC treatment. In the 45-60 cm soil layer, the water content under the interlayer treatment was higher than that under the CK treatment, and on the 15th day, the JG, SC and JS treatments increased by 4.8%, 3.7% and 5.4%, respectively. During the evaporation process, the salt content in the 0-100 cm profile of each treatment showed a 'low-high' distribution. In the 0-40 cm soil layer, the average soil salt content under JG, SC, and JS treatments was 35.0%-70.3%, 19.1%-51.4%, and 32.8%-62.7% lower than that under CK, respectively. In the 40-70 cm soil layer, the salt content of each treatment increased first and then decreased, and the JG, SC and JS treatments increased by 10.6%-14.4% compared with CK treatment. In the 70-100 cm soil layer, the average soil salt content under JG, SC and JS treatments was 8.4%-28.3% lower than that under CK treatment.

【Conclusion】

In summary, laying interlayers in saline-alkali soil could effectively regulate the distribution of water and salt. The effects of mixed sand layer and straw combined interlayer on inhibiting phreatic evaporation and salt return were better than that of single interlayer.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Scientia Agricultura Sinica
Pages 4246-4258

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
BAI X, LIU N, SONG J, et al. Mechanisms of Composite Interlayer in Regulating Water Infiltration, Evaporation, and Water-Salt Distribution in Saline-Alkali Soil. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(20): 4246-4258. https://doi.org/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.20.016

316

Views

1

Downloads

0

Crossref

2

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 14 July 2025
Accepted: 24 September 2025
Published: 16 October 2025
© 2025 The Journal of Scientia Agricultura Sinica