AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (8.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Electrocatalysts for Formic Acid-Powered PEM Fuel Cells: Challenges and Prospects

Hongfei Cheng1,2, John Wang2,3( ), Chuan Wu4 ( ), Zhaolin Liu2 ( )
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, People’s Republic of China
Institute of Materials Research and Engineering (IMRE), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 2 Fusionopolis Way, Innovis #08-03, Singapore 138634, Republic of Singapore
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117574, Republic of Singapore
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, People’s Republic of China
Show Author Information

Abstract

In view of the drawbacks of rechargeable batteries, such as low mass and volumetric energy densities, as well as slow charging rate, proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) are reckoned to be promising alternative devices for energy conversion. Currently, commercial PEMFCs mainly use H2 as the fuel, but the challenges in generation, storage, and handling of H2 limit their further development. Among the liquid fuels, formic acid possesses the merits of low flammability, low toxicity, slow crossover rate, faster reaction kinetics, and high volumetric H2 storage capacity, thus being considered as the most promising energy carrier. It can be used as the energy source for direct formic acid fuel cells (DFAFCs) and formic acid-based H2-PEMFCs, which are also called indirect formic acid fuel cells (IFAFCs). A common issue hindering their commercialization is lacking efficient electrocatalysts. In DFAFCs, the anodic electrocatalysts for formic acid oxidation are suffering from stability issue, whereas the cathodic electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction are prone to poisoning by the permeated formic acid. As for IFAFCs, CO and CO2 impurities generated from formic acid dehydrogenation will cause rapid decay in the catalytic activity. High working temperature can improve the CO and CO2 tolerance of catalysts but will accelerate catalyst degradation. This review will discuss the mitigation strategies and recent advances from the aspect of electrocatalysts to overcome the above challenges. Finally, some perspectives and future research directions to develop more efficient electrocatalysts will be provided for this promising field.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Energy Material Advances
Article number: 0067

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Cheng H, Wang J, Wu C, et al. Electrocatalysts for Formic Acid-Powered PEM Fuel Cells: Challenges and Prospects. Energy Material Advances, 2023, 4: 0067. https://doi.org/10.34133/energymatadv.0067

1226

Views

9

Downloads

42

Crossref

37

Web of Science

37

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 26 July 2023
Accepted: 16 October 2023
Published: 05 December 2023
© 2023 Hongfei Cheng et al. Exclusive licensee Beijing Institute of Technology Press. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY 4.0).