AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (24.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review Article | Open Access

Intracortical Microstimulation in Brain–Computer Interfaces: Evoking Perception and Plasticity

Pengfei Hu1,2,3,†, Chong Chen1,4,†, Yunliang Zang1,2,3, Xiaohong Li1,2,3( ), Dong Ming1,2,3( )
Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
Haihe Laboratory of Brain-Computer Interaction and Human-Machine Integration, Tianjin 300392, China
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Tianjin 300072, China
Integrative Medical Center, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300162, China

†These authors contributed equally to this work.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS), the activation of specific neuronal populations via microelectrodes implanted in the cortex, has emerged as a key technology for invasive brain–computer interfaces (BCIs). This article reviews the technical foundations and functional applications of ICMS within the BCI field, highlighting its diverse capabilities in both perception construction and targeted neuromodulation, while emphasizing the interface and parameter constraints that shape its long-term use. At the technical level, we analyze the evolution of ICMS microelectrode interfaces from rigid arrays to flexible, biomimetic, and biohybrid strategies, alongside key pulse-train parameters relevant to neural recruitment and application safety. Functionally, we discuss how biomimetic and spatiotemporally patterned ICMS generates high-resolution artificial tactile and visual perception, and how ICMS can serve as learnable information channels to guide behavior. We further consider temporally contingent and closed-loop ICMS as plasticity-based approaches for modulating cortical functional connectivity and pathological network activity in selected experimental models, while noting translational challenges related to stability, scalability, safety, and patient variability. Finally, we extend the discussion to novel biohybrid neural interfaces, including cell-seeded interface modifications, axon-guidance strategies, and stem-cell- and brain-organoid-integrated platforms, which provide a theoretical reference for next-generation biointegrated neuromodulation technologies in BCIs. Together, this review evaluates ICMS in BCIs along 2 central lines: evoking artificial perception and engaging plasticity-based modulation, while highlighting that long-term translation will require coordinated advances in interface reliability, stimulation encoding, closed-loop calibration, safety evaluation, and biohybrid integration.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Cyborg and Bionic Systems
Article number: 0690

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Hu P, Chen C, Zang Y, et al. Intracortical Microstimulation in Brain–Computer Interfaces: Evoking Perception and Plasticity. Cyborg and Bionic Systems, 2026, 7: 0690. https://doi.org/10.34133/cbsystems.0690

1

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 01 April 2026
Revised: 25 August 2026
Accepted: 26 August 2026
Published: 11 September 2026
© 2026 Pengfei Hu et al. Exclusive licensee Beijing Institute of Technology Press. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.