AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

First-Line Treatment Strategies in IMDC Favourable-Risk Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Alejandro Valdés1,2Jaime González-Montero1,3Carlos Rojas1,3Mauricio Burotto1,3( )
Bradford Hill Clinical Research Center, Santiago, Chile
Instituto Nacional del Cáncer, Santiago, Chile
Faculty of Medicine, Finis Terrae University, Santiago, Chile
Show Author Information

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGF-TKIs) have transformed the treatment landscape of advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Current guidelines favour ICI plus VEGF-TKI (IO+TKI) combinations for favourable-risk disease (International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium [IMDC] score 0) based on improved objective response rates and progression-free survival. However, no IO+TKI combination has demonstrated a statistically significant overall survival (OS) benefit in this subgroup. A pooled analysis of four pivotal phase III trials (n = 839 favourable-risk patients) revealed no OS advantage for IO+TKI versus sunitinib monotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.24; 95% CI 0.86–1.78) despite higher toxicity rates (71–82% Grade ≥ 3 adverse events vs. 63–72% with sunitinib) and substantially greater cost. The IMDC favourable-risk category represents approximately 20% of metastatic ccRCC cases and is often characterised by indolent disease biology. Emerging molecular classifications reveal distinct transcriptomic subgroups, including an angiogenic subtype (ccA/CC-e.2/clusters 1–2) enriched in favourable-risk patients, characterised by high hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) pathway gene expression, frequent PBRM1 mutations, robust VEGF-TKI responsiveness, and comparatively lower benefit from immunotherapy. Current clinical risk stratification fails to capture this molecular heterogeneity, limiting optimal treatment selection. VEGF-TKI monotherapy (median OS 47.6–79.4 months) and active surveillance remain valid, evidence-based alternatives in carefully selected favourable-risk patients, particularly those with asymptomatic, metachronous, or otherwise indolent disease. Uncritical universal use of IO+TKI in this population may therefore represent overtreatment. The development and validation of predictive biomarkers, refinement of molecular risk stratification, and exploration of novel agents with more favourable toxicity profiles (e.g., HIF-2α inhibitors) are urgently required to personalise therapy and identify candidates for rational treatment de-escalation.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Oncology Research
Article number: 4

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Valdés A, González-Montero J, Rojas C, et al. First-Line Treatment Strategies in IMDC Favourable-Risk Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Oncology Research, 2026, 34(8): 4. https://doi.org/10.32604/or.2026.077711

11

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 15 December 2025
Accepted: 03 April 2026
Published: 16 July 2026
© The Author 2026.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.