AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1,001.2 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

Effectiveness and Safety of Lenvatinib and Everolimus after Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer: A Systematic Review

Giacomo Iovane1( )Luca Traman2Michele Maffezzoli1,3Giuseppe Fornarini2Domenico Corradi4Debora Guareschi4Matteo Santoni#,5Sebastiano Buti#,1
Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, 43126, Italy
Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Genova, Genova, 16132, Italy
Medical Oncology Unit, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, PO6 3LY, UK
Pathology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, 43126, Italy
Medical Oncology Unit, Hospital of Macerata, Macerata, 62100, Italy

#These two authors contributed equally to this work as the co-last author

Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

While the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is evolving due to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), optimal strategies for later lines of therapy have yet to be defined. The combination of lenvatinib and everolimus represents a viable option, and the present review aimed to summarize its activity, effectiveness, and safety.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed, targeting studies published between 2018 and 2025. Eligible studies included English-language prospective and retrospective trials reporting survival outcomes in mRCC patients treated with lenvatinib and everolimus after at least one ICI-containing regimen.

Results

Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a total of 441 patients. The lenvatinib and everolimus combination was primarily used in the third and subsequent lines of therapy. Median overall survival ranged from 7.5 to 24.5 months, while median progression-free survival was more consistent, between 6.1 and 6.7 months, except for one study reporting 12.9 months. Objective response rates varied widely (14.0%–55.7%). Adverse events of grade ≥ 3 did not exceed the expected rate, with diarrhoea and proteinuria as the most reported events. Dose reductions and treatment discontinuations due to toxicity occurred but were generally lower than in prior pivotal trials.

Conclusions

Real-world evidence suggests that lenvatinib and everolimus represent an effective and safe option after ICI failure in mRCC patients. Nevertheless, the lack of randomized phase III trials and the heterogeneity of existing studies highlight the need for more robust prospective research to guide post-ICI therapeutic strategies.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Oncology Research
Article number: 3

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Iovane G, Traman L, Maffezzoli M, et al. Effectiveness and Safety of Lenvatinib and Everolimus after Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer: A Systematic Review. Oncology Research, 2026, 34(1): 3. https://doi.org/10.32604/or.2025.070523

1

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 18 July 2025
Accepted: 27 October 2025
Published: 30 December 2025
© The Author 2026.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.