AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Article | Open Access

Significance of CA125 Monitoring during Maintenance Treatment with Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor in Ovarian Cancer after First-Line Chemotherapy: Multicenter, Observational Study

Szymon Piątek1Anna Dańska-Bidzińska2( )Paweł Derlatka2Bartosz Szymanowski3Renata Duchnowska3Aleksandra Zielińska4Natalia Sawicka4Aleksander Gorzeń5Wojciech Michalski6Mariusz Bidziński1
Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, 02-781, Poland
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, 02-091, Poland
Department of Oncology, Military Institute of Medicine—National Research Institute, Warsaw, 04-141, Poland
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, 02-091, Poland
Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, 02-091, Poland
Department of Biomedical Statistics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, 02-781, Poland
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objectives

Monitoring of Cancer Antigen 125 (CA125) during ovarian cancer (OC) maintenance treatment with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) may be insufficient when using Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) biochemical progression criteria. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of CA125 monitoring in detecting OC recurrence during PARPis maintenance treatment.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients with primary OC who achieved complete or partial response after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy followed by PARPis maintenance treatment. Progression was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and GCIG biochemical criteria. New biochemical progression definitions, based on CA125 nadir determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, were proposed. Concordance between radiological and biochemical progression was assessed.

Results

Of 142 patients, progression was detected in 54 (38.03%) and 29 (20.42%) using RECIST and GCIG criteria, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the GCIG criteria were 53.70% [95% confidence interval (CI): 39.61%–67.38%], 100.00% [95% CI:95.91%–100.00%], 100.00% [95%CI: 88.10%–100.00%] and 77.88% [95% CI: 72.54%–82.43%], respectively. A cut-off of 1.59× nadir achieved 88.90% sensitivity and 87.20% specificity [Area Under Curve (AUC): 91.10%, 95% CI: 84.70%–97.40%] with a false positive rate (FPR) of 12.67%. Defining biochemical progression as an increase in CA125 of ≥3× nadir achieved sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and FPR of 79.63% [95% CI: 66.47%–89.37%], 98.86% [95% CI: 93.83%–99.97%], 97.73% [95% CI: 85.91%–99.67%], 88.78% [95% CI: 82.35%–93.06%], and 1.14%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy was higher using the ≥3× nadir criterion compared with GCIG definition (91.55% vs. 82.39%).

Conclusion

GCIG biochemical progression criteria during PARPis maintenance treatment after first-line chemotherapy missed 46.3% of progressing patients. A new criterion—CA125 ≥3× nadir—improves sensitivity and NPV, while maintaining high specificity, offering a simple and practical approach for clinical implementation.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Oncology Research
Pages 3405-3416

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Piątek S, Dańska-Bidzińska A, Derlatka P, et al. Significance of CA125 Monitoring during Maintenance Treatment with Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor in Ovarian Cancer after First-Line Chemotherapy: Multicenter, Observational Study. Oncology Research, 2025, 33(11): 3405-3416. https://doi.org/10.32604/or.2025.068609

172

Views

11

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 02 June 2025
Accepted: 08 September 2025
Published: 22 October 2025
© The Author 2024.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.