AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Article | Open Access

Comparative Thermo-Economic Analysis of Standalone and Hybrid Geothermal-Solar Organic Rankine Cycle Systems

Lihan Sun1Junze Gong2Jinteng Lv3( )Mingfei Mu3( )
Inspur Metarnet Communication Information System Co. Ltd., INSPUR GROUP Co. Ltd., Jinan, China
School of Geological Engineering, Qinghai University, Xining, China
Shandong Key Laboratory of Integrated Multi-Energy Systems for High Efficiency and Intelligent Operation/College of Energy Storage Technology, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Geothermal-solar hybrid power generation has been widely recognized as a promising application within the realm of renewable energy, as such hybridization mitigates solar intermittency while enhancing the utilization of medium-temperature geothermal resources, thus enabling effective energy complementarity. To quantitatively investigate its performance enhancement over single-source systems, this study constructs and analyzes three Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) based plants with a capacity of approximately 500 kW: a standalone solar ORC, a standalone geothermal ORC, and a hybrid geothermal-solar ORC system. A comprehensive analysis encompassing both design-point and annual off-design operations is conducted, followed by an economic assessment using key metrics. The Lhasa-Yangbajing region in Tibet, China, is selected as the case study due to its abundant geothermal resources and high solar irradiation, providing a representative testing scenario for hybrid energy utilization. At the design point, thermal efficiencies are 12.61% (solar), 6.66% (geothermal), and 9.14% (hybrid). Annual simulation results reflect the impact of solar intermittency, with power generation of 707.26, 4383.3, and 3488.9 MWh, respectively, demonstrating the hybrid system’s ability to balance output and stability. Economically, the specific investment costs are 6997.22, 3268, and 4978.4 USD/kWe, and the levelized costs of electricity (LCOE) are 14.09, 1.06, and 2.13 USD/kWh for the solar, geothermal, and hybrid systems. The hybrid configuration offers a favorable trade-off, significantly improving upon the geothermal-only efficiency while drastically reducing costs compared to the single solar system, confirming its substantial integrated application potential.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Frontiers in Heat and Mass Transfer
Article number: 14

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Sun L, Gong J, Lv J, et al. Comparative Thermo-Economic Analysis of Standalone and Hybrid Geothermal-Solar Organic Rankine Cycle Systems. Frontiers in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2026, 24(3): 14. https://doi.org/10.32604/fhmt.2026.081417

3

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 02 March 2026
Accepted: 23 April 2026
Published: 29 June 2026
© The Author 2026.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.