AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (12.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Article | Open Access

Geomechanical Characterization of Volcanic Pyroclast Using Machine Learning

Miguel A. Millán1( )Rubén Galindo2Fausto Molina-Gómez1
ETS Arquitectura, Avda. Juan de Herrera n°4, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
ETSI Caminos, C. y P., C/Profesor Aranguren s/n, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Show Author Information

Abstract

Low-density volcanic rocks have specific geomechanical properties that require complex laboratory tests and characterization that are not usually available in common geotechnical studies. A pyroclastic rock behaves at sufficiently “low” stress levels as if it were a conventional rock under the action of an external load, but when subjected to higher stresses, the bonds between its particles can break, leading to a sudden decrease in its volume and the reorganization of its particles, thus forming a more compact structure than the initial one. This process is known as “mechanical collapse” and involves a drastic change in the properties, which is critical for engineering purposes. A compilation and analysis of many tests performed in our laboratory was conducted, considering several inputs such as origin rock block, lithotype class, dry density, particle density, porosity, failure stresses in Cambridge variables (p and q), deformation at failure (%), and isotropic collapse stress. The collapse stress is not available for all tests, then a reasonable prediction is made using the parabolic model of collapse. The objective of this research is to develop a machine learning procedure using this dataset to predict the isotropic collapse stress, which is challenging to measure in standard laboratory settings. This model will use a set of variables that can be easily obtained in the laboratory. Based on this evaluation, a technician can determine whether a complementary lab test is necessary or if failure is unavoidable within the given range of stresses. Two procedures were tested, XGBoost and artificial neural networks, both showing an outstanding prediction behavior.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences
Article number: 19

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Millán MA, Galindo R, Molina-Gómez F. Geomechanical Characterization of Volcanic Pyroclast Using Machine Learning. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 2026, 147(3): 19. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2026.080219

7

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 04 February 2026
Accepted: 18 May 2026
Published: 30 June 2026
© The Author 2026.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.