AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Models: A Survey of Attack Methods, Root Causes, and Defense Strategies

Tongcheng Geng#,1Zhiyuan Xu#,2Yubin Qu3( )W. Eric Wong4
Department of Information and Network Security, The State Information Center, Beijing, 100032, China
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hohai University, Changzhou, 213200, China
School of Information Engineering, Jiangsu College of Engineering and Technology, Nantong, 226001, China
Department of Computer Science, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX 75080, USA

#Tongcheng Geng and Zhiyuan Xu contributed equally to this work

Show Author Information

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized AI applications across diverse domains. However, their widespread deployment has introduced critical security vulnerabilities, particularly prompt injection attacks that manipulate model behavior through malicious instructions. Following Kitchenham’s guidelines, this systematic review synthesizes 128 peer-reviewed studies from 2022 to 2025 to provide a unified understanding of this rapidly evolving threat landscape. Our findings reveal a swift progression from simple direct injections to sophisticated multimodal attacks, achieving over 90% success rates against unprotected systems. In response, defense mechanisms show varying effectiveness: input preprocessing achieves 60%–80% detection rates and advanced architectural defenses demonstrate up to 95% protection against known patterns, though significant gaps persist against novel attack vectors. We identified 37 distinct defense approaches across three categories, but standardized evaluation frameworks remain limited. Our analysis attributes these vulnerabilities to fundamental LLM architectural limitations, such as the inability to distinguish instructions from data and attention mechanism vulnerabilities. This highlights critical research directions such as formal verification methods, standardized evaluation protocols, and architectural innovations for inherently secure LLM designs.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Computers, Materials & Continua
Article number: 4

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Geng T, Xu Z, Qu Y, et al. Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Models: A Survey of Attack Methods, Root Causes, and Defense Strategies. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2026, 87(1): 4. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2025.074081

7

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

10

Scopus

Received: 01 October 2025
Accepted: 25 November 2025
Published: 10 February 2026
© The Author 2026.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.