AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (26.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Article | Open Access

Multiaxial Fatigue Life Prediction of Metallic Specimens Using Deep Learning Algorithms

Zhiming Liu1( )Xingchao Li2Zhongyao Wang3Beitong Li1Kaiyang Liu1Wang Long4
School of Mechanical, Electronic and Control Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, 100044, China
Locomotive & Car Research Institute, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing, 100081, China
CRRC Changchun Railway Vehicles Co., Ltd., Changchun, 130062, China
Chengdu EMU Depot, China Railway Chengdu Group Co., Ltd., Chengdu, 610057, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Accurately predicting fatigue life under multiaxial fatigue damage conditions is essential for ensuring the safety of critical components in service. However, due to the complexity of fatigue failure mechanisms, achieving accurate multiaxial fatigue life predictions remains challenging. Traditional multiaxial fatigue prediction models are often limited by specific material properties and loading conditions, making it difficult to maintain reliable life prediction results beyond these constraints. This paper presents a study on the impact of seven key feature quantities on multiaxial fatigue life, using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory Networks (LSTM), and Fully Connected Neural Networks (FCNN) within a deep learning framework. Fatigue test results from eight metal specimens were analyzed to identify these feature quantities, which were then extracted as critical time-series features. Using a CNN-LSTM network, these features were combined to form a feature matrix, which was subsequently input into an FCNN to predict metal fatigue life. A comparison of the fatigue life prediction results from the STFAN model with those from traditional prediction models—namely, the equivalent strain method, the maximum shear strain method, and the critical plane method—shows that the majority of predictions for the five metal materials and various loading conditions based on the STFAN model fall within an error band of 1.5 times. Additionally, all data points are within an error band of 2 times. These findings indicate that the STFAN model provides superior prediction accuracy compared to the traditional models, highlighting its broad applicability and high precision.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Computers, Materials & Continua
Pages 1-18

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Liu Z, Li X, Wang Z, et al. Multiaxial Fatigue Life Prediction of Metallic Specimens Using Deep Learning Algorithms. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2026, 86(1): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2025.068353

12

Views

2

Downloads

1

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 26 May 2025
Accepted: 16 July 2025
Published: 10 November 2025
© The Author 2025.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.