AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (8.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Article | Open Access

A Comparative Study of Data Representation Techniques for Deep Learning-Based Classification of Promoter and Histone-Associated DNA Regions

Sarab Almuhaideb1( )Najwa Altwaijry1Isra Al-Turaiki1Ahmad Raza Khan2Hamza Ali Rizvi3
Computer Science Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 51178, Riyadh, 11543, Saudi Arabia
Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, 721302, India
Computer Science and Engineering Department, Punjab Engineering College, Sector 12, Chandigarh, 160012, India
Show Author Information

Abstract

Many bioinformatics applications require determining the class of a newly sequenced Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequence, making DNA sequence classification an integral step in performing bioinformatics analysis, where large biomedical datasets are transformed into valuable knowledge. Existing methods rely on a feature extraction step and suffer from high computational time requirements. In contrast, newer approaches leveraging deep learning have shown significant promise in enhancing accuracy and efficiency. In this paper, we investigate the performance of various deep learning architectures: Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), CNN-Long Short-Term Memory (CNN-LSTM), CNN-Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (CNN-BiLSTM), Residual Network (ResNet), and InceptionV3 for DNA sequence classification. Various numerical and visual data representation techniques are utilized to represent the input datasets, including: label encoding, k-mer sentence encoding, k-mer one-hot vector, Frequency Chaos Game Representation (FCGR) and 5-Color Map (ColorSquare). Three datasets are used for the training of the models including H3, H4 and DNA Sequence Dataset (Yeast, Human, Arabidopsis Thaliana). Experiments are performed to determine which combination of DNA representation and deep learning architecture yields improved performance for the classification task. Our results indicate that using a hybrid CNN-LSTM neural network trained on DNA sequences represented as one-hot encoded k-mer sequences yields the best performance, achieving an accuracy of 92.1%.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Computers, Materials & Continua
Pages 3095-3128

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Almuhaideb S, Altwaijry N, Al-Turaiki I, et al. A Comparative Study of Data Representation Techniques for Deep Learning-Based Classification of Promoter and Histone-Associated DNA Regions. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2025, 85(2): 3095-3128. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2025.067390

175

Views

3

Downloads

2

Crossref

1

Web of Science

2

Scopus

Received: 01 May 2025
Accepted: 09 July 2025
Published: 23 September 2025
© The Author 2024.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.