AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Article | Open Access

Dual-Perspective Evaluation of Knowledge Graphs for Graph-to-Text Generation

Haotong Wang#( )Liyan Wang#Yves Lepage
Graduate School of Information, Production and Systems, Waseda University, Fukuoka, 808-0135, Japan

#These authors contributed equally to this work

Show Author Information

Abstract

Data curation is vital for selecting effective demonstration examples in graph-to-text generation. However, evaluating the quality of Knowledge Graphs (KGs) remains challenging. Prior research exhibits a narrow focus on structural statistics, such as the shortest path length, while the correctness of graphs in representing the associated text is rarely explored. To address this gap, we introduce a dual-perspective evaluation framework for KG-text data, based on the computation of structural adequacy and semantic alignment. From a structural perspective, we propose the Weighted Incremental Edge Method (WIEM) to quantify graph completeness by leveraging agreement between relation models to predict possible edges between entities. WIEM targets to find increments from models on “unseen links”, whose presence is inversely proportional to the structural adequacy of the original KG in representing the text. From a semantic perspective, we evaluate how well a KG aligns with the text in capturing the intended meaning. To do so, we instruct a large language model to convert KGs into natural language and measure the similarity between generated and reference texts. Based on these computations, we apply a Top-K union method, integrating the structural and semantic modules, to rank and select high-quality KGs. We evaluate our framework against various approaches for selecting few-shot examples in graph-to-text generation. Experiments on the Association for Computational Linguistics Abstract Graph Dataset (ACL-AGD) and Automatic Content Extraction 05 (ACE05) dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in distinguishing KG-text data of different qualities, evidenced by the largest performance gap between top- and bottom-ranked examples. We also find that the top examples selected through our dual-perspective framework consistently yield better performance than those selected by traditional measures. These results highlight the importance of data curation in improving graph-to-text generation.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Computers, Materials & Continua
Pages 305-324

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Wang H, Wang L, Lepage Y. Dual-Perspective Evaluation of Knowledge Graphs for Graph-to-Text Generation. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2025, 84(1): 305-324. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2025.066351

1059

Views

56

Downloads

0

Crossref

1

Web of Science

1

Scopus

Received: 28 March 2025
Accepted: 28 April 2025
Published: 09 June 2025
© The Author 2024.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.