AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (920.1 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Article | Open Access

Machine Fault Diagnosis Using Audio Sensors Data and Explainable AI Techniques-LIME and SHAP

Aniqua Nusrat Zereen1Abir Das2Jia Uddin3( )
School of Data and Sciences, Brac University, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh
JW KIM College of Future Studies, Endicott College, Woosong University, Daejeon, 300-718, Republic of Korea
AI and Big Data Department, Endicott College, Woosong University, Daejeon, 300-718, Republic of Korea
Show Author Information

Abstract

Machine fault diagnostics are essential for industrial operations, and advancements in machine learning have significantly advanced these systems by providing accurate predictions and expedited solutions. Machine learning models, especially those utilizing complex algorithms like deep learning, have demonstrated major potential in extracting important information from large operational datasets. Despite their efficiency, machine learning models face challenges, making Explainable AI (XAI) crucial for improving their understandability and fine-tuning. The importance of feature contribution and selection using XAI in the diagnosis of machine faults is examined in this study. The technique is applied to evaluate different machine-learning algorithms. Extreme Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machine, Gaussian Naive Bayes, and Random Forest classifiers are used alongside Logistic Regression (LR) as a baseline model because their efficacy and simplicity are evaluated thoroughly with empirical analysis. The XAI is used as a targeted feature selection technique to select among 29 features of the time and frequency domain. The XAI approach is lightweight, trained with only targeted features, and achieved similar results as the traditional approach. The accuracy without XAI on baseline LR is 79.57%, whereas the approach with XAI on LR is 80.28%.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Computers, Materials & Continua
Pages 3463-3484

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Zereen AN, Das A, Uddin J. Machine Fault Diagnosis Using Audio Sensors Data and Explainable AI Techniques-LIME and SHAP. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2024, 80(3): 3463-3484. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2024.054886

2344

Views

171

Downloads

9

Crossref

17

Web of Science

19

Scopus

Received: 10 June 2024
Accepted: 14 August 2024
Published: 12 September 2024
© The Author 2024.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.