AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home BIOCELL Article
PDF (1.8 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

Understanding Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress as a Central Driver of Atherosclerosis

Alessio L. Ravani1Michael I. Bukrinsky2Anastasia V. Poznyak3( )
Unit for Study of Aortic, Valvular and Coronary Pathologies, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, via Carlo Parea 4, Milan, 20138, Italy
School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20037, USA
R&D Lab, Institute for Atherosclerosis Research, Osennyaya Street 4-1-207, Moscow, 121609, Russia
Show Author Information

Abstract

Atherosclerosis (AS) remains a major contributor to cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality worldwide. Its development involves dysregulated lipid handling, persistent vascular inflammation, and endothelial cell (EC) dysfunction, influenced by genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors. Increasing evidence highlights a pivotal role of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress as a molecular link between lipid dysregulation and inflammatory signaling in AS pathogenesis. ER stress is triggered by modified LDL, oxidized lipids, hyperhomocysteinemia, oxidative stress (OS), and disrupted calcium (Ca2+) homeostasis, leading to activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR). Core UPR mediators—inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1), protein kinase RNA-like ER kinase (PERK), and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6)—initially act to restore ER homeostasis but, when persistently activated, may drive pro-inflammatory cytokine production, apoptosis, and plaque destabilization. The aim of this review is to critically synthesize primary research evidence on ER stress as a mediator of lipid-driven inflammation in ECs, macrophages, and vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), emphasizing disease-stage–specific effects. Current debates include whether macrophage ER stress promotes necrotic core expansion vs. apoptosis-mediated clearance, and whether ER stress in ECs is initially protective or primarily pathogenic. Emerging therapeutic strategies targeting ER stress are summarized, including chemical chaperones, AMPK activators, and natural compounds. We highlight the importance of lipid- and inflammation-specific ER stress modulation, noting limitations such as off-target effects and poor bioavailability that hinder translation. Our goal is to achieve a deeper understanding of the lipid–ER stress–inflammation axis to facilitate the design of therapies that may slow AS progression.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
BIOCELL
Article number: 6

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Ravani AL, Bukrinsky MI, Poznyak AV. Understanding Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress as a Central Driver of Atherosclerosis. BIOCELL, 2026, 50(3): 6. https://doi.org/10.32604/biocell.2025.074266

7

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 07 October 2025
Accepted: 21 November 2025
Published: 23 March 2026
© The Author 2026.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.