AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home Tree Health Article
PDF (558.5 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research paper | Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of seven pesticides against Cinara bungeanae on Pinus bungeana

Guang Li1Li Zhong1Fei Xia1Na Li1Fei Yuan2Shaochen Che1Jianhong Wang1Jinli Shao1Jianghong Zhou1Xinyu Zhang3Xingci Zhang4Lanfen Qiu1( )
Beijing Key Laboratory of Ecological Function Assessment and Regulation Technology of Green Space,Beijing Academy of Forestry and Landscape Architecture,Beijing 100102,China
Beijing Municipal Forestry and Parks Resource Conservation Center (Approval Service Center of Beijing Municipal Forestry and Parks Bureau),Beijing 101118,China
Beijing Jinglin Landscape Architecture Group Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100085,China
Nanliyuan Forest Farm,Fangshan District,Beijing 102425,China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Cinara bungeanae Zhang et Zhang is the primary piercing-sucking pest affecting Pinus bungeana Zucc. ex Endl, significantly compromising tree health and ornamental value. To facilitate rational pest management, this study evaluated the control efficacy of seven pesticides against Cinara bungeanae and assessed the safety of the three most effective compounds against five common natural enemy insects of piercing-sucking pests. Results indicated that 22% sulfoxaflor SC (30000× dilution), 17% flupyradifurone SL (3000× dilution), and 2% thiacloprid CS (1500× dilution) exhibited high efficacy and rapid knockdown against Cinara bungeanae. However, these agents also exert measurable impacts on natural enemies; therefore, their application should be timed to avoid peak activity periods of beneficial insects such as lady beetles and lacewings. Afidopyropen DC (50 g·L−1, 12000× dilution) and 25% pymetrozine SC (6000× dilution) demonstrated lower immediate efficacy but are suitable for integration with biological control strategies under low pest population densities. Matrine SL (1%, 600× dilution) and 22.4% spirotetramat SC (6000× dilution) demonstrated suboptimal efficacy against the target pest and are not recommended for standalone use.

CLC number: S763.35 Document code: A

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Tree Health
Pages 60-67

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Li G, Zhong L, Xia F, et al. Evaluation of efficacy and safety of seven pesticides against Cinara bungeanae on Pinus bungeana. Tree Health, 2026, 3(2): 60-67. https://doi.org/10.27035/j.cnki.issn2097-5279.20260207

5

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

Received: 13 January 2026
Revised: 06 March 2026
Published: 25 April 2026
© 2026 Tree Health.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).