AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.9 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Research Article | Open Access | Online First

Self-reported outcomes and associated factors among patients with cancer completing Mongolian mind-body interaction therapy: a cross-sectional study

Nagongbilige1, Hong-yun Wu2, Bao-jun De1, Wen-feng Bao3, Jing-peng Yang4, Sarnai Arlud5, Jun Fang3, Narisu De5, Da-hua Wang6, Haorile Chagan-Yasutan5, Caihela Hushud1, Yu Du7( ), Li-ping Gong8, Zhao-lan Liu9, Zhi-qiang Li9
Mongolian Psychosomatic Medicine Department of Azitai Mongolian Medicine Hospital of Inner Mongolia, Erdos, 017299, China
Foreign Languages School, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China
Psychosomatic Medicine Department, Inner Mongolia Traditional Chinese and Mongolian Medical Research Institute, Hohhot, 010065, China
College of Humanities, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, 100876, China
Psychosomatic Medicine Center of Inner Mongolia International Mongolian Hospital, Hohhot, 010065, China
Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
Business Analytics Discipline, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, 80202, USA
Department of Clinical Pathology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China
Center for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 100029, Beijing, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Introduction

Patients with malignant tumors face physical illness and psychological distress. Mongolian mind-body interaction therapy (MMBIT) is a group-based intervention combining modern psychology with traditional Mongolian medicine. As a complementary oncology approach, MMBIT supports conventional evidence-based care. This study characterized the demographic and clinical profiles of MMBIT participants and identified therapeutic factors associated with reported benefits.

Methods

A cross-sectional analysis included 1590 patients with cancer who completed the 21-session MMBIT course. A 121-item questionnaire assessed self-reported outcomes across six domains: physical symptoms, psychological symptoms, positive emotions, life conditions, health knowledge, and perceived treatment efficacy. One-sample t-tests, Pearson correlations, nonparametric group comparisons, and multivariable linear regression were used.

Results

Participants reported favorable outcomes across all six domains, with mean scores significantly above the neutral midpoint of the 5-point scale (all P < 0.001). The highest ratings were observed for health knowledge (4.55 [0.58]), life conditions (4.43 [0.67]), and positive emotions (4.35 [0.70]). Greater MMBIT engagement, particularly video-based participation, was positively associated with more favorable self-reported outcomes (r = 0.21–0.34). Farmers, herdsmen, and participants with lower educational attainment reported higher outcome scores (P < 0.001); lower educational attainment remained the strongest independent predictor after multivariable adjustment. Participants reported lower use of surgery and radiation/chemotherapy and greater use of Mongolian medicine following MMBIT; however, treatment appropriateness and clinical indications were not assessed, so these findings should not be interpreted as evidence that MMBIT can replace conventional treatment.

Conclusions

MMBIT participation was associated with favorable self-reported outcomes across multiple health domains among patients with cancer. However, the cross-sectional design, reliance on self-reported measures, and selection bias from including only therapy completers limit causal interpretation. Future prospective controlled studies incorporating objective clinical outcomes are needed to validate these findings and clarify MMBIT’s potential role as a culturally grounded supportive care intervention.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
9570045_ESM.pdf (273.7 KB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine and Technology Assessment

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Nagongbilige, Wu H-y, De B-j, et al. Self-reported outcomes and associated factors among patients with cancer completing Mongolian mind-body interaction therapy: a cross-sectional study. Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine and Technology Assessment, 2026, https://doi.org/10.26599/eCMTA.2026.9570045

18

Views

2

Downloads

0

Crossref

Received: 10 June 2026
Revised: 17 July 2026
Accepted: 23 August 2026
Published: 28 September 2026
© 2026 Beijing University of Chinese Medicine. Production and hosting by Tsinghua University Press.

This is an open access article under the CC-BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).