AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Research Article | Open Access

The application of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials of digestive tract tumors conducted in China: a cross-sectional study of registered clinical trial protocols

Jian Lan1,2Qi Li1,2Yu-qing Zhang1,2Xiao-wen Zhang1,3Hong-guo Rong1,3( )Chun-xia Zhou4( )
Center for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China
The First Clinical Medical College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China
Institute for Excellence in Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China
Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Acupuncture, The Second Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Introduction

With the adoption of international health standards, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly used in clinical trials, promoting the effective implementation of patient-centered healthcare. However, the characteristics of PRO use in digestive tract tumor trials in China remain poorly understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate PRO application and characteristics in randomized clinical trials of digestive tract tumors conducted in China.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, we identified data from the ClinicalTrials.gov database and the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry and the dataset was restricted to randomized clinical trials of digestive tract tumors conducted in China between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2025. Trials were classified into four groups: (1) those listing PROs as primary outcomes; (2) those listing PROs as secondary outcomes; (3) trials listing PROs as co-primary outcomes (both primary and secondary); and (4) trials without any PRO instrument.

Results

Of 2292 trials, 928 (40.5%) incorporated PRO instruments as part of their results. Among these, 29.6% (275/928) listed PRO as primary outcomes, 54.2% (503/928) as secondary outcomes, and 16.2% (150/928) as co-primary outcomes. The most frequent conditions for the explicit use of specific PRO instruments included colorectal (405/928, 43.6%), stomach (229/928, 24.7%), and esophageal (166/928, 17.9%) tumors. Commonly used PRO instruments included the Visual Analog Scale, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30, and the Numeric Rating scale. Among relevant trials, only 4.8% (6/125) used the traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) Symptom Score.

Conclusions

Recently, PRO use has shown an increasing trend in randomized clinical trials on digestive tract tumors conducted in China. Nonetheless, the low proportion of clinical trials of digestive tract tumors using PROs remains noteworthy. Future efforts should develop TCM-specific PRO tools and integrate TCM syndrome scales with Western PROs in TCM-oncology trials.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
eCMTA-9570015_ESM.pdf (149.4 KB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine and Technology Assessment
Article number: 9570015

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Lan J, Li Q, Zhang Y-q, et al. The application of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials of digestive tract tumors conducted in China: a cross-sectional study of registered clinical trial protocols. Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine and Technology Assessment, 2025, 1(2): 9570015. https://doi.org/10.26599/eCMTA.2025.9570015

1989

Views

100

Downloads

0

Crossref

Received: 31 July 2025
Revised: 29 August 2025
Accepted: 27 September 2025
Published: 30 September 2025
© 2025 Beijing University of Chinese Medicine. Production and hosting by Tsinghua University Press.

This is an open access article under the CC-BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).