Discover the SciOpen Platform and Achieve Your Research Goals with Ease.
Search articles, authors, keywords, DOl and etc.
The gender-affirmative model of care has proven unsuccessful in many cases of gender dysphoria. There is a pressing need to continue research and develop and implement alternative models of care. Personalised models of care need to replace the standardised ones to reflect the unique nature of internal issues that exist within every individual. A holistic care model that includes Physical, Mental, Emotional, Social, and Spiritual (PMESS) aspects of a person’s wellbeing indicates an effective way forward. Such a multidimensional model enables a greater understanding of complex relationships between different factors and their effects on health and overall wellbeing. Empowered by intelligent technologies, such as data mining and Artificial Intelligence (AI), the PMESS model can systematically capture, analyse, and evaluate data across the multiple dimensions of the holistic model of care. It can help identify patterns within the data, generate useful insights, and support the development of effective prevention and personalized treatment strategies. The PMESS-AI model supports the collaboration between multiple stakeholders, and the machine learning aspects of it can usher in the discovery of new knowledge and breakthroughs in research.
D. Chen, M. A. Hidalgo, S. Leibowitz, J. Leininger, L. Simons, C. Finlayson, and R. Garofalo, Multidisciplinary care for gender-diverse youth: A narrative review and unique model of gender-affirming care, Transgend. Health, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 117–123, 2016.
M. M. Telfer, M. A. Tollit, C. C. Pace, and K. C. Pang, Australian standards of care and treatment guidelines for transgender and gender diverse children and adolescents, Med. J. Aust., vol. 209, no. 3, pp. 132–136, 2018.
R. D’Angelo, E. Syrulnik, S. Ayad, L. Marchiano, D. T. Kenny, and P. Clarke, One size does not fit all: In support of psychotherapy for gender dysphoria, Arch. Sex. Behav., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 7–16, 2021.
C. M. Lopez, D. Solomon, S. D. Boulware, and E. R. Christison-Lagay, Trends in the use of puberty blockers among transgender children in the United States, J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab., vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 665–670, 2018.
J. Firth, M. Solmi, R. E. Wootton, D. Vancampfort, F. B. Schuch, E. Hoare, S. Gilbody, J. Torous, S. B. Teasdale, S. E. Jackson, et al., A meta-review of “lifestyle psychiatry”: The role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders, World Psychiatry, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 360–380, 2020.
S. Li, J. Song, P. Ke, L. Kong, B. Lei, J. Zhou, Y. Huang, H. Li, G. Li, J. Chen, et al., The gut microbiome is associated with brain structure and function in schizophrenia, Sci. Rep., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 9743, 2021.
T. Hori, K. Matsuda, and K. Oishi, Probiotics: A dietary factor to modulate the gut microbiome, host immune system, and gut-brain interaction, Microorganisms, vol. 8, no. 9, p. 1401, 2020.
M. Saad, R. de Medeiros, and A. Mosini, Are we ready for a true biopsychosocial–spiritual model? the many meanings of “spiritual”, Medicines, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 79, 2017.
P. S. Mueller, D. J. Plevak, and T. A. Rummans, Religious involvement, spirituality, and medicine: Implications for clinical practice, Mayo Clin. Proc., vol. 76, no. 12, pp. 1225–1235, 2001.
V. Counted, A. Possamai, and T. Meade, Relational spirituality and quality of life 2007 to 2017: An integrative research review, Health Qual. Life Outcomes, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 75, 2018.
R. Sawatzky, P. A. Ratner, and L. Chiu, A meta-analysis of the relationship between spirituality and quality of life, Soc. Indic. Res., vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 153–188, 2005.
C. Su, Z. Xu, J. Pathak, and F. Wang, Deep learning in mental health outcome research: A scoping review, Transl. Psychiatry, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 116, 2020.
C. Garcia-Vidal, G. Sanjuan, P. Puerta-Alcalde, E. Moreno-García, and A. Soriano, Artificial intelligence to support clinical decision-making processes, EBioMedicine, vol. 46, pp. 27–29, 2019.
N. R. Winter, M. Cearns, S. R. Clark, R. Leenings, U. Dannlowski, B. T. Baune, and T. Hahn, From multivariate methods to an AI ecosystem, Mol. Psychiatry, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 6116–6120, 2021.
A. M. Y. Tai, A. Albuquerque, N. E. Carmona, M. Subramanieapillai, D. S. Cha, M. Sheko, Y. Lee, R. Mansur, and R. S. McIntyre, Machine learning and big data: Implications for disease modeling and therapeutic discovery in psychiatry, Artif. Intell. Med., vol. 99, p. 101704, 2019.
M. Uddin, Y. Wang, and M. Woodbury-Smith, Artificial intelligence for precision medicine in neurodevelopmental disorders, NPJ Digit. Med., vol. 2, p. 112, 2019.
E. E. Lee, J. Torous, M. De Choudhury, C. A. Depp, S. A. Graham, H.-C. Kim, M. P. Paulus, J. H. Krystal, and D. V. Jeste, Artificial intelligence for mental health care: Clinical applications, barriers, facilitators, and artificial wisdom, Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 856–864, 2021.
C. M. Bertoncelli, P. Altamura, E. R. Vieira, D. Bertoncelli, and F. Solla, Using artificial intelligence to identify factors associated with autism spectrum disorder in adolescents with cerebral palsy, Neuropediatrics, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 178–187, 2019.
S. Berrouiguet, R. Billot, M. E. Larsen, J. Lopez-Castroman, I. Jaussent, M. Walter, P. Lenca, E. Baca-García, and P. Courtet, An approach for data mining of electronic health record data for suicide risk management: Database analysis for clinical decision support, JMIR Ment. Health, vol. 6, no. 5, p. e9766, 2019.
The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).