AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Improved Double Deep Q Network-Based Task Scheduling Algorithm in Edge Computing for Makespan Optimization

School of Computer Science, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
School of Software, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
School of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou 313000, China
School of Computing, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, EH10 5DT, UK

Show Author Information

Abstract

Edge computing nodes undertake an increasing number of tasks with the rise of business density. Therefore, how to efficiently allocate large-scale and dynamic workloads to edge computing resources has become a critical challenge. This study proposes an edge task scheduling approach based on an improved Double Deep Q Network (DQN), which is adopted to separate the calculations of target Q values and the selection of the action in two networks. A new reward function is designed, and a control unit is added to the experience replay unit of the agent. The management of experience data are also modified to fully utilize its value and improve learning efficiency. Reinforcement learning agents usually learn from an ignorant state, which is inefficient. As such, this study proposes a novel particle swarm optimization algorithm with an improved fitness function, which can generate optimal solutions for task scheduling. These optimized solutions are provided for the agent to pre-train network parameters to obtain a better cognition level. The proposed algorithm is compared with six other methods in simulation experiments. Results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms other benchmark methods regarding makespan.

References

[1]

X. Xu, H. Li, W. Xu, Z. Liu, L. Yao, and F. Dai, Artificial intelligence for edge service optimization in Internet of vehicles: A survey, Tsinghua Science and Technology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 270–287, 2021.

[2]

M. Laroui, B. Nour, H. Moungla, M. A. Cherif, H. Afifi, and M. Guizani, Edge and fog computing for IoT: A survey on current research activities & future directions, Comput. Commun., vol. 180, pp. 210–231, 2021.

[3]

X. Xu, H. Tian, X. Zhang, L. Qi, Q. He, and W. Dou, DisCOV: Distributed COVID-19 detection on X-ray images with edge-cloud collaboration, IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1206–1219, 2022.

[4]

S. B. Slama, Prosumer in smart grids based on intelligent edge computing: A review on artificial intelligence scheduling techniques, Ain Shams Eng. J., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 101504, 2022.

[5]
H. Wang, L. Cai, X. Hao, J. Ren, and Y. Ma, ETS-TEE: An energy-efficient task scheduling strategy in a mobile trusted computing environment, Tsinghua Science and Technology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 105–116, 2022.
[6]

M. S. U. Islam, A. Kumar, and Y. C. Hu, Context-aware scheduling in fog computing: A survey, taxonomy, challenges and future directions, J. Netw. Comput. Appl., vol. 180, p. 103008, 2021.

[7]

X. Xu, Q. Jiang, P. Zhang, X. Cao, M. R. Khosravi, L. T. Alex, L. Qi, and W. Dou, Game theory for distributed IoV task offloading with fuzzy neural network in edge computing, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 4593–4604, 2022.

[8]
X. Gao, D. Peng, G. Kui, J. Pan, X. Zuo, and F. Li. Reinforcement learning based optimization algorithm for maintenance tasks scheduling in coalbed methane gas field, Comput. Chem. Eng., vol. 170, p. 108131, 2023.
[9]
H. Tian, X. Xu, T. Lin, Y. Cheng, C. Qian, L. Ren, and M. Bilal, DIMA: Distributed cooperative microservice caching for Internet of Things in edge computing by deep reinforcement learning, World Wide Web, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1769–1792, 2022.
[10]

A. Jayanetti, S. Halgamuge, and R. Buyya, Deep reinforcement learning for energy and time optimized scheduling of precedence-constrained tasks in edge-cloud computing environments, Future Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 137, pp. 14–30, 2022.

[11]
Z. Li, X. Xu, X. Cao, W. Liu, Y. Zhang, D. Chen, and H. Dai, Integrated CNN and federated learning for COVID-19 detection on chest X-ray images, IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2022.3184319.
[12]

S. Vemireddy and R. R. Rout, Fuzzy reinforcement learning for energy efficient task offloading in vehicular fog computing, Comput. Netw., vol. 199, p. 108463, 2021.

[13]

Z. Tang, W. Jia, X. Zhou, W. Yang, and Y. You, Representation and reinforcement learning for task scheduling in edge computing, IEEE Trans. Big Data, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 795–808, 2022.

[14]
M. N. Tran and Y. Kim, A cloud QoS-driven scheduler based on deep reinforcement learning, in Proc. 2021 Int. Conf. Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), Jeju Island, Republic of Korea, 2021, pp. 1823–1825.
[15]
Z. Yang, M. Xiao, and Y. Ge, Dynamic resource scheduling of cloud-based automatic test system using reinforcement learning, in Proc. 2017 13th IEEE Int. Conf. Electronic Measurement & Instruments (ICEMI), Yangzhou, China, 2017, pp. 159–165.
[16]
D. Ding, X. Fan, Y. Zhao, K. Kang, Q. Yin, and J. Zeng, Q-learning based dynamic task scheduling for energy-efficient cloud computing, Future Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 108, pp. 361–371, 2020.
[17]

H. Tian, X. Xu, L. Qi, X. Zhang, W. Dou, S. Yu, and Q. Ni, CoPace: Edge computation offloading and caching for self-driving with deep reinforcement learning, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 70, no. 12, pp. 13281–13293, 2021.

[18]

H. Che, Z. Bai, R. Zuo, and H. Li, A deep reinforcement learning approach to the optimization of data center task scheduling, Complexity, vol. 2020, p. 3046769, 2020.

[19]
Q. Liu, R. Mo, X. Xu, and X. Ma, Multi-objective resource allocation in mobile edge computing using PAES for Internet of Things, Wirel. Netw. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02409-w.
[20]

H. Xu, J. Zhou, W. Wei, and B. Cheng, Multiuser computation offloading for long-term sequential tasks in mobile edge computing environments, Tsinghua Science and Technology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 93–104, 2022.

[21]
T. Choudhari, M. Moh, and T. S. Moh, Prioritized task scheduling in fog computing, in Proc. ACMSE 2018 Conference, Richmond, Kentucky, 2018, pp. 1–8.
[22]

Q. Liu, X. Wu, X. Liu, Y. Zhang, and Y. Hu, Near-data prediction based speculative optimization in a distribution environment, Mob. Netw. Appl., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 2339–2347, 2022.

[23]

W. Qi, Optimization of cloud computing task execution time and user QoS utility by improved particle swarm optimization, Microprocess. Microsyst., vol. 80, p. 103529, 2021.

[24]
B. Huang, W. Xia, Y. Zhang, J. Zhang, Q. Zou, F. Yan, and L. Shen, A task assignment algorithm based on particle swarm optimization and simulated annealing in ad-hoc mobile cloud, in Proc. 2017 9th Int. Conf. Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP), Nanjing, China, 2017, pp. 1–6.
[25]
J. Gao, Machine learning applications for data center optimization, Google White Paper, https://research.google/pubs/pub42542/, 2014.
[26]
B. Dab, N. Aitsaadi, and R. Langar, Q-learning algorithm for joint computation offloading and resource allocation in edge cloud, in Proc. 2019 IFIP/IEEE Symp. on Integrated Network and Service Management (IM), Arlington, VA, USA, 2019, pp. 45–52.
[27]

X. Zhao, G. Huang, L. Gao, M. Li, and Q. Gao, Low load DIDS task scheduling based on Q-learning in edge computing environment, J. Netw. Comput. Appl., vol. 188, p. 103095, 2021.

[28]
J. C. Guevara, R. da S Torres, L. F. Bittencourt, and N. L. S. da Fonseca, QoS-aware task scheduling based on reinforcement learning for the cloud-fog continuum, in Proc. GLOBECOM 2022-2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2022, pp. 2328–2333.
[29]
Y. Wei, L. Pan, S. Liu, L. Wu, and X. Meng, DRL-scheduling: An intelligent QoS-aware job scheduling framework for applications in clouds, IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 55112–55125, 2018.
[30]

T. Dong, F. Xue, C. Xiao, and J. Li, Task scheduling based on deep reinforcement learning in a cloud manufacturing environment, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp., vol. 32, no. 11, p. e5654, 2020.

[31]
J. Li, X. Zhang, J. Wei, Z. Ji, and Z. Wei, GARLSched: Generative adversarial deep reinforcement learning task scheduling optimization for large-scale high performance computing systems, Future Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 135, pp. 259–269, 2022.
[32]

P. Gazori, D. Rahbari, and M. Nickray, Saving time and cost on the scheduling of fog-based IoT applications using deep reinforcement learning approach, Future Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 110, pp. 1098–1115, 2020.

[33]

Q. Zhang, M. Lin, L. T. Yang, Z. Chen, S. U. Khan, and P. Li, A double deep Q-learning model for energy-efficient edge scheduling, IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 739–749, 2019.

[34]

S. Swarup, E. M. Shakshuki, and A. Yasar, Energy efficient task scheduling in fog environment using deep reinforcement learning approach, Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 191, pp. 65–75, 2021.

Tsinghua Science and Technology
Pages 806-817
Cite this article:
Zeng L, Liu Q, Shen S, et al. Improved Double Deep Q Network-Based Task Scheduling Algorithm in Edge Computing for Makespan Optimization. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2024, 29(3): 806-817. https://doi.org/10.26599/TST.2023.9010058

506

Views

63

Downloads

17

Crossref

20

Web of Science

21

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 10 February 2023
Revised: 25 April 2023
Accepted: 03 June 2023
Published: 04 December 2023
© The Author(s) 2024.

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return