AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (4.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Truthful Mechanism for Crowdsourcing Task Assignment

Yonglong ZhangHaiyan QinBin LiJin WangSungyoung LeeZhiqiu Huang( )
School of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China.
College of Information Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China.
Department of Computer Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Suwon 449-701, Korea.
Show Author Information

Abstract

As an emerging “human problem solving strategy”, crowdsourcing has attracted much attention where requesters want to employ reliable workers to complete specific tasks. Task assignment is an important branch of crowdsourcing. Most existing studies in crowdsourcing have not considered self-interested individuals’ strategy. To guarantee truthfulness, auction has been regarded as a promising method to charge the requesters for the tasks completed and reward the workers for performing the tasks. In this study, an online task assignment scenario is considered where each worker has a set of experienced skills, whereas a specific task is budget-constrained and requires one or more skills. In this scenario, the crowdsourcing task assignment was modeled as a reverse auction where the requesters are buyers and the workers are sellers. Three incentive mechanisms, namely, Truthful Mechanism for Crawdsourcing-Vickrey-Clarke-Grove (TMC-VCG), TMC-Simple Task (ST) for a simple task case, and TMC-Complex Task (CT) for a complex task case are proposed. Here, a simple task case means that the requester asks for a single skill, and a complex task case means that the requester asks for multiple skills. The related properties of each of the three mechanisms are determined theoretically. Moreover, the truthfulness is verified, and other performances are evaluated by extensive simulations.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Tsinghua Science and Technology
Pages 645-659

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Zhang Y, Qin H, Li B, et al. Truthful Mechanism for Crowdsourcing Task Assignment. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2018, 23(6): 645-659. https://doi.org/10.26599/TST.2018.9010064

978

Views

44

Downloads

4

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

7

Scopus

1

CSCD

Received: 23 February 2017
Revised: 17 April 2017
Accepted: 20 April 2017
Published: 15 October 2018
© The authors 2018