Journal Home > Volume 24 , Issue 3

For Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) systems, improving the Information Transfer Rate (ITR) is a very critical issue. This study focuses on a Steady-State Visually Evoked Potential (SSVEP)-based BCI because of its advantage of high ITR. Unsupervised Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA)-based method has been widely employed because of its high efficiency and easy implementation. In a recent study, an ensemble-CCA method based on individual training data was proposed and achieved an excellent performance with ITR of 267 bit/min. A 40-target SSVEP-BCI speller was investigated in this study, using an integration of Minimal-Distance (MD) and Maximal-Phase-locking value (MP) approaches. In the MD approach, a spatial filter is developed to minimize the distance between the training data and the reference sine signal, and in this study, two different types of distance were compared. In the MP approach, a spatial filter is developed to maximize the Phase-Locking Value (PLV) between the training calibration data and the reference sine signal. In addition to the fundamental frequency of stimulation, the harmonics were used to train MD and MP spatial filters, which formed spatial filter banks. The test data epoch was multiplied by the MP and MD spatial filter banks, and the distances and PLVs were extracted as features for recognition. Across 12 subjects with a 0.4 s-data length, the proposed method realized an average classification accuracy and ITR of 93% and 307 bit/min, respectively, which is significantly higher than the current state-of-the-art method. To the best of our knowledge, these results suggest that the proposed method has achieved the highest ITR in SSVEP-BCI studies.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Boosting the Information Transfer Rate of an SSVEP-BCI System Using Maximal-Phase-Locking Value and Minimal-Distance Spatial Filter Banks

Show Author's information Ke LinShangkai GaoXiaorong Gao( )
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.

Abstract

For Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) systems, improving the Information Transfer Rate (ITR) is a very critical issue. This study focuses on a Steady-State Visually Evoked Potential (SSVEP)-based BCI because of its advantage of high ITR. Unsupervised Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA)-based method has been widely employed because of its high efficiency and easy implementation. In a recent study, an ensemble-CCA method based on individual training data was proposed and achieved an excellent performance with ITR of 267 bit/min. A 40-target SSVEP-BCI speller was investigated in this study, using an integration of Minimal-Distance (MD) and Maximal-Phase-locking value (MP) approaches. In the MD approach, a spatial filter is developed to minimize the distance between the training data and the reference sine signal, and in this study, two different types of distance were compared. In the MP approach, a spatial filter is developed to maximize the Phase-Locking Value (PLV) between the training calibration data and the reference sine signal. In addition to the fundamental frequency of stimulation, the harmonics were used to train MD and MP spatial filters, which formed spatial filter banks. The test data epoch was multiplied by the MP and MD spatial filter banks, and the distances and PLVs were extracted as features for recognition. Across 12 subjects with a 0.4 s-data length, the proposed method realized an average classification accuracy and ITR of 93% and 307 bit/min, respectively, which is significantly higher than the current state-of-the-art method. To the best of our knowledge, these results suggest that the proposed method has achieved the highest ITR in SSVEP-BCI studies.

Keywords: SSVEP-BCI, Information Transfer Rate (ITR), spatial filter, distance, Phase-Locking Value (PLV)

References(36)

[1]
Wolpaw J. R., Birbaumer N., McFarland D. J., Pfurtscheller G., and Vaughan T. M., Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control, Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 113, no. 6, pp. 767-791, 2002.
[2]
Gao S. K., Wang Y. J., Gao X. R., and Hong B., Visual and auditory brain-computer interfaces, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1436-1447, 2014.
[3]
Lebedev M. A. and Nicolelis M. A. L., Brain-machine interfaces: Past, present and future, Trends Neurosci., vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 536-546, 2006.
[4]
Wang Y. J., Gao X. R., Hong B., Jia C., and Gao S. K., Brain-computer interfaces based on visual evoked potentials, IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 64-71, 2008.
[5]
Chen X. G., Chen Z. K., Gao S. K., and Gao X. R., A high-ITR SSVEP-based BCI speller, Brain-Comput. Interfaces, vol. 1, nos. 3&4, pp. 181-191, 2014.
[6]
Chen X. G., Wang Y. J., Nakanishi M., Gao X. R., Jung T. P., and Gao S. K., High-speed spelling with a noninvasive brain-computer interface, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 112, no. 44, pp. 6058-6067, 2015.
[7]
Wu X. J., Zeng L. L., Shen H., Li M., Hu Y. A., and Hu D. W., Blind source separation of functional MRI scans of the human brain based on canonical correlation analysis, Neurocomputing, vol. 269, pp. 220-225, 2017.
[8]
Bin G. Y., Gao X. R., Yan Z., Hong B., and Gao S. K., An online multi-channel SSVEP-based brain-computer interface using a canonical correlation analysis method, J. Neural Eng., vol. 6, no. 4, p. 046002, 2009.
[9]
Lin K., Cinetto A., Wang Y. J., Chen X. G., Gao S. K., and Gao X. R., An online hybrid BCI system based on SSVEP and EMG, J. Neural Eng., vol. 13, no. 2, p. 026020, 2016.
[10]
Yin E. W., Zhou Z. T., Jiang J., Yu Y., and Hu D. W., A dynamically optimized SSVEP Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) speller, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 1447-1456, 2015.
[11]
Zhang Y., Zhou G. X., Zhao Q. B., Onishi A., Jin J., Wang X. Y., and Cichocki A., Multiway canonical correlation analysis for frequency components recognition in SSVEP-based BCIs, in Neural Information Processing, Lu B. L., Zhang L. Q., and Kwok J., eds. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2011, pp. 287-295.
DOI
[12]
Zhang Y., Zhou G. X., Jin J., Wang M. J., Wang X. Y., and Cichocki A., L1-regularized multiway canonical correlation analysis for SSVEP-based BCI, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 887-896, 2013.
[13]
Zhang Y., Zhou G. X., Jin J., Wang X. Y., and Cichocki A., Frequency recognition in SSVEP-based BCI using multiset canonical correlation analysis, Int. J. Neural Syst., vol. 24, no. 4, p. 1450013, 2014.
[14]
Poryzala P. and Materka A., Cluster analysis of CCA coefficients for robust detection of the asynchronous SSVEPs in brain-computer interfaces, Biomed. Signal Process. Control., vol. 10, pp. 201-208, 2014.
[15]
Zhang D., Huang B. S., Wu W., and Li S. L., An idle-state detection algorithm for SSVEP-based brain-computer interfaces using a maximum evoked response spatial filter, Int. J. Neural Syst., vol. 25, no. 7, p. 1550030, 2015.
[16]
Onton J., Westerfield M., Townsend J., and Makeig S., Imaging human EEG dynamics using independent component analysis, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 808-822, 2006.
[17]
Nunez P. L., Srinivasan R., Westdorp A. F., Wijesinghe R. S., Tucker D. M., Silberstein R. B., and Cadusch P. J., EEG coherency I: Statistics, reference electrode, volume conduction, laplacians, cortical imaging, and interpretation at multiple scales, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 499-515, 1997.
[18]
Makeig S., Bell A. J., Jung T. P., and Sejnowski T. J., Independent component analysis of electroencephalographic data, in Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Neural Information Processing Systems, Denver, CO, USA, 1996, pp. 145-151.
DOI
[19]
Delorme A., Sejnowski T., and Makeig S., Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis, NeuroImage, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1443-1449, 2007.
[20]
Müller-Gerking J., Pfurtscheller G., and Flyvbjerg H., Designing optimal spatial filters for single-trial EEG classification in a movement task, Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 110, no. 5, pp. 787-798, 1999.
[21]
Blankertz B., Tomioka R., Lemm S., Kawanabe M., and Muller K. R., Optimizing spatial filters for robust EEG single-trial analysis, IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 41-56, 2008.
[22]
Ramoser H., Muller-Gerking J., and Pfurtscheller G., Optimal spatial filtering of single trial EEG during imagined hand movement, IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 441-446, 2000.
[23]
Xu N., Gao X. R., Hong B., Miao X. B., Gao S. K., and Yang F. S., BCI competition 2003-data set IIb: Enhancing P300 wave detection using ICA-based subspace projections for BCI applications, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1067-1072, 2004.
[24]
Tanaka H., Katura T., and Sato H., Task-related component analysis for functional neuroimaging and application to near-infrared spectroscopy data, NeuroImage, vol. 64, pp. 308-327, 2013.
[25]
Suefusa K. and Tanaka T., Phase-based detection of intentional state for asynchronous brain-computer interface, in Proc. 2015 IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Brisbane, Australia, 2015, pp. 808-812.
DOI
[26]
Di Russo F. and Spinelli D., Electrophysiological evidence for an early attentional mechanism in visual processing in humans, Vision Res., vol. 39, no. 18, pp. 2975-2985, 1999.
[27]
Aydore S., Pantazis D., and Leahy R. M., A note on the phase locking value and its properties, NeuroImage, vol. 74, pp. 231-244, 2013.
[28]
Lachaux J. P., Rodriguez E., Martinerie J., and Varela F. J., Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals, Hum. Brain Mapp., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 194-208, 1999.
DOI
[29]
Hughes J. R., Human brain electrophysiology, Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 73, no. 1, p. 255, 1989.
[30]
Chen X. G., Wang Y. J., Gao S. K., Jung T. P., and Gao X. R., Filter bank canonical correlation analysis for implementing a high-speed SSVEP-based brain-computer interface, J. Neural Eng., vol. 12, no. 4, p. 046008, 2015.
[31]
Müller-Putz G. R., Scherer R., Brauneis C., and Pfurtscheller G., Steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based communication: Impact of harmonic frequency components, J. Neural Eng., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 123-130, 2005.
[32]
Wang Y. J., Wang R. P., Gao X. R., Hong B., and Gao S. K., A practical VEP-based brain-computer interface, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 234-240, 2006.
[33]
Raina R., Battle A., Lee H., Packer B., and Ng A. Y., Self-taught learning: Transfer learning from unlabeled data, in Proc. 24th Int. Conf. Machine Learning, Corvalis, OR, USA, pp. 759–766, 2007.
DOI
[34]
Pan S. J. and Yang Q., A survey on transfer learning, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1345-1359, 2010.
[35]
Sutton R. S. and Barto A. G., Reinforcement learning: An introduction, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, vol. 9, no. 5, p. 1054, 1998.
[36]
Mnih V., Kavukcuoglu K., Silver D., Rusu A. A., Veness J., Bellemare M. G., Graves A., Riedmiller M., Fidjeland A. K., Ostrovski G., et al., Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning, Nature, vol. 518, no. 7540, pp. 529-533, 2015.
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 27 June 2017
Revised: 12 August 2017
Accepted: 24 August 2017
Published: 24 January 2019
Issue date: June 2019

Copyright

© The author(s) 2019

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61431007 and 91320202).

Rights and permissions

Return