AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Progressive fracture evolution and mechanical response of cavity-containing sandstone under low-frequency disturbance

Ming-wei JIANG1,2,3,4Yun-tao LIANG1,2,3( )Shan-shan XUE4,5Hai-tao LI4,5Tuan HE4,5Cheng YANG1,4Guan-yu YANG4,5Ju MA6Chao PENG7
China Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China
CCTEG Shenyang Research Institute, Fushun, Liaoning 113000, China
College of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
Deep Mining and Rock Burst Research Institute, Chinese Institute of Coal Science, Beijing 100013, China
State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Coal Mining and Strata Control, China Coal Technology & Engineering Group, Beijing 100013, China
School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, China
Deep Mining Laboratory of Shandong Gold Group Co., Ltd., Yantai, Shandong 264000, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

During deep coal mining, interlayer rock strata subjected to high static stress and low-frequency dynamic load are prone to fracture and instability, often leading to dynamic disasters. To investigate the dynamic response of rock fracture, deformation, and mechanical behavior under low-frequency disturbances, uniaxial compression tests were conducted on perforated sandstone specimens at different loading rates. This study explores the crack evolution, fracture ejection patterns, and dynamic strain behavior of sandstone under disturbance. The results reveal the following key findings: (1) The mechanical properties of sandstone are significantly influenced by the loading rate, with peak strength increasing nonlinearly as the loading rate rises. When the loading rate increases fivefold, the average peak strengths of the single-hole, double-hole, and triple-hole specimens increase by 9.67%, 14.64%, and 9.44%, respectively. However, as the number of perforations increases, the overall load-bearing capacity of sandstone decreases, and the average peak strengths are reduced by 12.58%, 12.15%, and 13.23%, respectively. (2) The acoustic emission (AE) characteristics and stress-time evolution curves of sandstone exhibit distinct inflection points. AE activity is relatively weak during the crack initiation stage, but AE events increase sharply before failure, accompanied by an exponential rise in AE energy. This phenomenon can serve as an early warning indicator of dynamic failure in high-stress sandstone under low-frequency disturbances. (3) Based on the failure modes and the extent of surface spalling and block ejection, sandstone failure can be classified into three types. The mean σc/σz values for type Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ specimens are 0.959, 0.765, and 0.687, respectively, indicating significant differences in mechanical properties among different failure modes. (4) The strain distribution in the rock specimens is closely related to the number of perforations. As the number of perforations increases, pronounced stress shielding zones and horizontal tensile strain zones develop between the holes during loading, providing the main pathways for crack propagation.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Rock and Soil Mechanics
Pages 2041-2054

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
JIANG M-w, LIANG Y-t, XUE S-s, et al. Progressive fracture evolution and mechanical response of cavity-containing sandstone under low-frequency disturbance. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(6): 2041-2054. https://doi.org/10.26599/RSM.2025.94300353

8

Views

1

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 19 June 2025
Accepted: 12 September 2025
Published: 16 September 2026
© 2026 Rock and Soil Mechanics