AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (5.6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Probabilistic back analysis of slope parameters and reliability evaluation using improved Bayesian updating method

Hong-peng HU1Shui-hua JIANG1( )Dong CHEN2Jin-song HUANG1Chuang-bing ZHOU1
School of Infrastructure Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330031, China
Jiangxi Provincial Natural Gas Group Co., Ltd., Pipeline Branch Nanchang, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330096, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

The geomechanical parameters for a particular site exhibit inherent uncertainties due to geological processes, and probabilistic back analysis incorporating field observation data can effectively reduce these uncertainties. Although the BUS (Bayesian Updating with Subset simulation) method can transform the high-dimensional probabilistic back analysis problem with the equality site information into an equivalent structural reliability problem, the value of the constructed likelihood function can become extremely small or even lower than the computer floating-point operation accuracy as the field observation data increase, which might seriously affect the computational efficiency and accuracy of probabilistic back analysis. To this end, this paper proposes an improved BUS method based on the parallel system reliability analysis. Starting from the Cholesky decomposition-based midpoint method, the total failure domain with a low acceptance rate is decomposed into several sub-failure domains with a high acceptance rate so as to avoid the “curse of dimensionality” arising from the integration of a large amount of field observation data, and to achieve accurate back analysis of the geomechanical parameters of slopes. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method is validated through a case study of an undrained saturated clay slope. The results show that the proposed method can integrate a large number of borehole data and the observation information of slope service state for efficient probabilistic back analysis of geomechanical parameters and slope reliability evaluation with reasonable accuracy. The proposed method provides an effective tool for high-dimensional probabilistic back analysis of spatially variable soil parameters and slope reliability evaluation.

References

[1]

CHRISTIAN J T, LADD C C, BAECHER G B. Reliability applied to slope stability analysis[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 120(12): 2180−2207.

[2]

PHOON K K, KULHAWY F H. Characterization of geotechnical variability[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1999, 36(4): 612−624.

[3]

ERING P, BABU G L S. Probabilistic back analysis of rainfall induced landslide-A case study of Malin landslide, India[J]. Engineering Geology, 2016, 208: 154−164.

[4]

WANG L, HWANG J H, LUO Z, et al. Probabilistic back analysis of slope failure–a case study in Taiwan[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2013, 51: 12−23.

[5]

DENG J H, LEE C F. Displacement back analysis for a steep slope at the Three Gorges Project site[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2001, 38(2): 259−268.

[6]

HARRIS S J, ORENSE R P, ITOH K. Back analyses of rainfall-induced slope failure in Northland Allochthon formation[J]. Landslides, 2012, 9(3): 349−356.

[7]

QI Zu-fang, JIANG Qing-hui, ZHOU Chuang-bing, et al. A new slope displacement back analysis method based on v-svr and mvpso algorithm and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(6): 1185−1196.

[8]

JIANG Wei, OUYANG Ye, YAN Jin-zhou, et al. Inversion iterative correction method for estimating shear strength of rock and soil mass in slope engineering[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(8): 2287−2295.

[9]

PAPAIOANNOU I, STRAUB D. Learning soil parameters and updating geotechnical reliability estimates under spatial variability[J]. Georisk, 2017, 11(1): 116−128.

[10]

JIANG S H, PAPAIOANNOU I, STRAUB D. Bayesian updating of slope reliability in spatially variable soils with in-situ measurements[J]. Engineering Geology, 2018, 239: 310−320.

[11]

SUN Y, HUANG J, JIN W, et al. Bayesian updating for progressive excavation of high rock slopes using multi-type monitoring data[J]. Engineering Geology, 2019, 252: 1−13.

[12]

OUYANG J, LIU Y. Model updating for slope stability assessment in spatially varying soil parameters using multi-type observations[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2022, 171: 108906.

[13]

ZHANG Wen-gang, GU Xin, LIU Han-long, et al. Probabilistic back analysis of soil parameters and displacement prediction of unsaturated slopes using Bayesian updating[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(4): 1112−1122.

[14]

LIU X, WANG Y, KOO R C H, et al. Development of a slope digital twin for predicting temporal variation of rainfall-induced slope instability using past slope performance records and monitoring data[J]. Engineering Geology, 2022, 308: 106825.

[15]

JIANG Shui-hua, LIU Yuan, ZHANG Hao-long, et al. Quantitatively evaluating the effects of prior probability distribution and likelihood function models on slope reliability assessment[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(9): 3087−3097.

[16]

LIU Y, LIU C, XU W, et al. Efficient probabilistic back analysis of spatially varying soil parameters based on monitored displacements[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2022, 15(9): 817.

[17]

JIANG S H, HUANG J, QI X H, et al. Efficient probabilistic back analysis of spatially varying soil parameters for slope reliability assessment[J]. Engineering Geology, 2020, 271: 105597.

[18]

CHING J, WANG J S. Application of the transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm to probabilistic site characterization[J]. Engineering Geology, 2016, 203: 151−167.

[19]

LEE S H, SONG J. System identification of spatial distribution of structural parameters using modified transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo method[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2017, 143(9): 04017099.

[20]

STRAUB D, PAPAIOANNOU I. Bayesian updating with structural reliability methods[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2015, 141(3).

[21]
DODT M B, KITAHARA M, BROGGI M, et al. Comparison of state of the art sampling-based Bayesian Updating techniques[C]//Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Reliability Engineering and Risk Management. Singapore: Research Publishing (S) Pte Ltd., 2022.
[22]

JEREZ D J, JENSEN H A, BEER M. An effective implementation of reliability methods for Bayesian model updating of structural dynamic models with multiple uncertain parameters[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2022, 225: 108634.

[23]

SONG C, WANG Z, SHAFIEEZADEH A, et al. BUAK-AIS: efficient Bayesian updating with active learning kriging-based adaptive importance sampling[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2022, 391: 114578.

[24]

WANG Z, SHAFIEEZADEH A. Bayesian updating with adaptive, uncertainty-informed subset simulations: high-fidelity updating with multiple observations[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2023, 230: 108901.

[25]

DEPINA I, OGUZ E A, THAKUR V. Novel Bayesian framework for calibration of spatially distributed physical-based landslide prediction models[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2020, 125: 103660.

[26]

KASAMA K, WHITTLE A J, ZEN K. Effect of spatial variability on the bearing capacity of cement-treated ground[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2012, 52(4): 600−619.

[27]

WU S H, OU C Y, CHING J, et al. Reliability-based design for basal heave stability of deep excavations in spatially varying soils[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2012, 138(5): 594.

[28]

LI D, CHEN Y, LU W, et al. Stochastic response surface method for reliability analysis of rock slopes involving correlated non-normal variables[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2011, 38(1): 58−68.

[29]

SIMOEN E, PAPADIMITRIOU C, LOMBAERT G. On prediction error correlation in Bayesian model updating[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2013, 332(18): 4136−4152.

[30]

STRAUB D, PAPAIOANNOU I, BETZ W. Bayesian analysis of rare events[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2016, 314: 538−556.

[31]

PAPAIOANNOU I, BETZ W, ZWIRGLMAIER K, et al. MCMC algorithms for subset simulation[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2015, 41: 89−103.

[32]

AU S K, BECK J L. Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2001, 16(4): 263−277.

[33]

WANG Y, CAO Z, AU S K. Practical reliability analysis of slope stability by advanced Monte Carlo simulations in a spreadsheet[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2011, 48(1): 162−172.

[34]

ASAOKA A, A-GRIVAS D. Spatial variability of the undrained strength of clays[J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 1982, 108(5): 743−756.

[35]

ZHANG L L, ZHANG J, ZHANG L M, et al. Back analysis of slope failure with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2010, 37(7-8): 905−912.

[36]

KAMARIOTIS A, SARDI L, PAPAIOANNOU I, et al. On off-line and on-line Bayesian filtering for uncertainty quantification of structural deterioration[J]. Data-Centric Engineering, 2023(4): e17.

[37]

SANTOSO A M, PHOON K K, QUEK S T. Modified Metropolis–Hastings algorithm with reduced chain correlation for efficient subset simulation[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2011, 26(2): 331−341.

Rock and Soil Mechanics
Pages 835-845
Cite this article:
HU H-p, JIANG S-h, CHEN D, et al. Probabilistic back analysis of slope parameters and reliability evaluation using improved Bayesian updating method. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(3): 835-845. https://doi.org/10.26599/RSM.2024.9435485

190

Views

7

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 19 April 2023
Accepted: 12 June 2023
Published: 18 March 2024
© 2024 Rock and Soil Mechanics
Return