AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (10.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review Article | Open Access | Just Accepted

Polyoxometalates for Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysis: From Molecular Active Motifs to Interfacial Regulators and Practical Electrolyzers

Xiangyu Liu1,§, Lirong Zhang1,§, Jiaran Fu1, Peishan Xiao1, Hao Hu1, Ke Yang1, Huan Ren2, Qingnuan Zhang1( ), Weiyu Shi2( ), Jiangwei Zhang1,2 ( )

1 College of Energy Material and Chemistry, Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Low Carbon Catalysis, Inner Mongolia University, Inner Mongolia Advanced Research Institute, Ministry of Education, Hohhot 010021, China

2 Shanghai Hydrogen Propulsion Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China

§ Xiangyu Liu and Lirong Zhang contributed equally to this work.

Show Author Information

Abstract

The oxygen evolution reaction (OER) remains the principal kinetic bottleneck in water electrolysis because its multistep proton-electron transfer is coupled with dynamic structural evolution under anodic bias. Beyond the intrinsic four-electron barrier, practical operation is constrained by metal dissolution, phase reconstruction, interfacial instability, and catalyst-layer degradation at high current densities. Polyoxometalates (POMs), featuring structurally programmable metal-oxygen clusters, reversible multielectron redox chemistry, oxygen-rich surfaces, and versatile coordination sites, offer a distinctive platform for addressing these challenges. This review analyzes the evolution of POMs from discrete molecular catalysts to confined guests, interfacial electronic regulators, reconstruction-directing units, and stabilization modules in OER electrocatalysts. Particular emphasis is placed on how POM structure and interfacial bonding modify metal valence, orbital hybridization, charge transfer, d-band characteristics, and intermediate adsorption energetics, and how these effects govern activity and durability. The discussion further extends to high-current-density electrolysis, saline media, membrane-electrode assemblies, and device-level validation. Key unresolved issues include identification of the true active phase, definition of pH-potential-time stability windows, conductivity and loading limitations, and POM leaching. A six-pathway framework is finally proposed to connect representative POM states with the elementary OER steps and guide mechanism-informed catalyst design. This framework highlights priorities for scalable, durable, and predictable electrolyzer implementation.

Graphical Abstract

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Nano Research Energy

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Liu X, Zhang L, Fu J, et al. Polyoxometalates for Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysis: From Molecular Active Motifs to Interfacial Regulators and Practical Electrolyzers. Nano Research Energy, 2026, https://doi.org/10.26599/NRE.2026.9120283

362

Views

40

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 19 June 2026
Revised: 06 July 2026
Accepted: 04 August 2026
Available online: 09 October 2026

© The Author(s) 2026. Published by Tsinghua University Press.

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.