AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review Article | Open Access

10-Minute vs. 4-Hour Post-Gadolinium 3D-FLAIR MRI for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The First Clinical College, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China,
Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China,

† These authors contributed equally to this article as co-first authors.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the performance of 10-minute and 4-hour delayed-enhanced Three-Dimensional Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Magnetic Resonance Imaging (3D-FLAIR MRI) for the detection of inner ear abnormalities in sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL).

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was performed independently by two researchers, covering databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct and CNKI up to June 4, 2025. Original research studies comparing 10-minute and 4-hour delayed-enhanced 3D-FLAIR MRI in evaluating SSNHL were included. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data (JBI) was used for quality assessment. All literature was independently screened and data were extracted, followed by meta-analysis and subgroup analysis using RevMan 5.4 to compare the performance of 10-minute and 4-hour delayed-enhanced 3D-FLAIR MRI.

Results

Four studies including 211 affected ears in 210 SSNHL patients met inclusion criteria for the systematic review. All patients underwent 10-minute and 4-hour delayed-enhanced 3D-FLAIR MRI scanning. The meta-analysis showed a statistically significant difference in detection rates between the 10-minute and 4-hour delays (risk difference [RD], -0.24; 95% CI, -0.38 to -0.10; I2=63%; p=0.0006). Subgroup analyses indicated that study type, region and Gd dose may be the sources of heterogeneity.

Conclusion

A 4-hour delay reveals 24% more abnormal findings than a 10-minute delay in Gd-enhanced 3D-FLAIR MRI. Therefore, we recommend a 4-hour delay for the clinical evaluation of SSNHL patients.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Otology
Pages 239-246

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Liu Y, Zhao Z, Gong Z, et al. 10-Minute vs. 4-Hour Post-Gadolinium 3D-FLAIR MRI for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Otology, 2026, 21(4): 239-246. https://doi.org/10.26599/JOTO.2026.9540079

18

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 02 November 2025
Revised: 22 September 2026
Accepted: 03 October 2026
Published: 03 November 2026
© 2026 PLA General Hospital Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Publishing services by Tsinghua University Press.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).