AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (478.7 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research paper | Open Access

Complication rates of Reuter Bobbin titanium versus Sheehy Collar Button fluoroplastic tympanostomy tubes in children with otitis media: a retrospective cohort study

Jad HosriAnne Marie DaouOmar Aboul HosnJonathan Abou ChaarNader ZalaquettRanda Barazi( )
American University of Beirut Medical Center, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background: Tympanostomy tube (TT) insertion is one of the most common pediatric otologic procedures. This study compares postoperative complications between two commonly used tympanostomy tubes: Reuter Bobbin titanium tubes and Sheehy Collar Button fluoroplastic tubes.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Methods: The medical records of children aged 6 months to 7 years who underwent TT insertion at a tertiary care center between July 2022 and June 2023 were reviewed. Patients were divided according to the inserted tube model: Reuter Bobbin titanium or Sheehy Collar Button fluoroplastic. The main outcomes were postoperative ear drainage and complications, including tube clogging, granulation tissue formation, premature extrusion, and tympanic membrane perforation, assessed across the first, second, and third follow-up visits.

Results: A total of 138 patients who underwent TT insertion in 268 ears were included; 181 ears received Sheehy Collar Button fluoroplastic tubes and 87 ears received Reuter Bobbin titanium tubes. At the third follow-up visit (7.46 ± 2.93 months), the overall complication rate was higher in ears with Reuter Bobbin titanium tubes than in those with Sheehy Collar Button fluoroplastic tubes (44.4% vs. 5.6%, p < 0.001). Ear drainage was more frequent in the fluoroplastic tube group across follow-up visits (7.2%, 18.4%, and 27.8% vs. 1.1%, 7.4%, and 0%, respectively; p = 0.054, p = 0.12, and p < 0.001).

Conclusion: In this retrospective cohort, Reuter Bobbin titanium tubes were associated with higher later complication rates, whereas Sheehy Collar Button fluoroplastic tubes were associated with higher postoperative drainage.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Otology
Pages 197-201

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Hosri J, Daou AM, Aboul Hosn O, et al. Complication rates of Reuter Bobbin titanium versus Sheehy Collar Button fluoroplastic tympanostomy tubes in children with otitis media: a retrospective cohort study. Journal of Otology, 2026, 21(3): 197-201. https://doi.org/10.26599/JOTO.2026.9540073

6

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 17 June 2025
Revised: 14 July 2026
Accepted: 14 July 2026
Published: 27 July 2026
© 2026 PLA General Hospital Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Publishing services by Tsinghua University Press.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).