Journal Home > Volume 7 , Issue 4

Functional laterality is known as an intrinsic property of the brain. Since several studies have shown the presence of laterality in many species other than humans, it has been suggested that this is an adaptive mechanism to aid survival. Previous studies have shown that lateralized behavior observed during exposure to different environmental stimuli is not constant in normal animals, depending on the geometrical form of the exploratory field. In these exploratory fields, animals showed right- or left-biased exploratory behavior, according to the nature of the geometrical properties of the environment. Previously, it was found that tellurium (Te) was able to block spontaneous left-biased exploration in one defined geometrical environment. In the present work, the influence of Te and selenium (Se) in animals exposed to novel geometrically different environments were studied. Three geometrically different testing fields (square, rectangle, and T-shaped) were presented to Se- and Te-treated groups of rats. The results show that in the square field, only the Se treatment was able to block spontaneous right-biased exploratory responses; in the rectangular field, both Se and Te treatments blocked right-biased exploratory responses, and in the T-shaped field, only Te was able to block spontaneous left-biased exploratory responses. Data suggest that trace elements modify lateralized behavioral responses independently of the form of the novel exploratory field, suggesting the presence of a specific action in the brain.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Lateralized spontaneous exploratory behavior in maturing rats induced by new geometrically differentiated environments after administration with trace elements

Show Author's information Silvia G. Ratti1Osvaldo J. Sacchi1,2Edgardo O. Alvarez1( )
Laboratorio de Neuropsicofarmacología Experimental, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina
IMBECU, CONICET, CCT, Mendoza, Argentina

Abstract

Functional laterality is known as an intrinsic property of the brain. Since several studies have shown the presence of laterality in many species other than humans, it has been suggested that this is an adaptive mechanism to aid survival. Previous studies have shown that lateralized behavior observed during exposure to different environmental stimuli is not constant in normal animals, depending on the geometrical form of the exploratory field. In these exploratory fields, animals showed right- or left-biased exploratory behavior, according to the nature of the geometrical properties of the environment. Previously, it was found that tellurium (Te) was able to block spontaneous left-biased exploration in one defined geometrical environment. In the present work, the influence of Te and selenium (Se) in animals exposed to novel geometrically different environments were studied. Three geometrically different testing fields (square, rectangle, and T-shaped) were presented to Se- and Te-treated groups of rats. The results show that in the square field, only the Se treatment was able to block spontaneous right-biased exploratory responses; in the rectangular field, both Se and Te treatments blocked right-biased exploratory responses, and in the T-shaped field, only Te was able to block spontaneous left-biased exploratory responses. Data suggest that trace elements modify lateralized behavioral responses independently of the form of the novel exploratory field, suggesting the presence of a specific action in the brain.

Keywords: laterality, selenium, novelty, geometrical environments, tellurium

References(44)

[1]
L Tommasi. Mechanisms and functions of brain and behavioural asymmetries. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2009, 364(1519): 855-859.
[2]
SM Schaafsma, BJ Riedstra, KA Pfannkuche, et al. Epigenesis of behavioural lateralization in humans and other animals. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2009, 364(1519): 915-927.
[3]
K Hugdahl, R Westerhausen. The two halves of the brain. The MIT Press, 2010.
DOI
[4]
VA Abrego, SG Ratti, EO Alvarez. Motivated lateralized behaviour in the rat: role of the ventral Hippocampus. Am J Neuroprotect Neuroregen. 2013, 5(1): 92-100.
[5]
SG Ratti, P Cordoba, S Rearte, EO Alvarez. Differential expression of handedness, scalp hair-whorl direction, and cognitive abilities in primary school children. Int J Neuroprotec Neuroregen. 2007, 4: 52-60.
[6]
VA Sovrano. Visual lateralization in response to familiar and unfamiliar stimuli in fish. Behav Brain Res. 2004, 152(2): 385-391.
[7]
A Robins, G Lippolis, A Bisazza, et al. Lateralized agonistic responses and hindlimb use in toads. Anim Behav. 1998, 56(4): 875-881.
[8]
J Vauclair, Y Yamazaki, O Güntürkün. The study of hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations in animals. Neuropsychologia. 2006, 44(9): 1524-1534.
[9]
E Versace, M Morgante, G Pulina, et al. Behavioural lateralization in sheep (Ovisaries). Behav Brain Res. 2007, 184(1): 72-80.
[10]
K Hugdahl. Lateralization of cognitive processes in the brain. Acta Psychol. 2000, 105(2/3): 211-235.
[11]
JL Ringo, RW Doty, S Demeter, et al. Time is of the essence: a conjecture that hemispheric specialization arises from interhemispheric conduction delay. Cereb Cortex. 1994, 4(4): 331-343.
[12]
HJ Lee, RF Schneider, T Manousaki, et al. Lateralized feeding behavior is associated with asymmetrical neuroanatomy and lateralized gene expressions in the brain in scale-eating cichlid fish. Genome Biol Evol. 2017, 9(11): 3122-3136.
[13]
EO Alvarez, AM Banzan. Functional lateralization of the baso-lateral amygdala neural circuits modulating the motivated exploratory behaviour in rats: role of histamine. Behav Brain Res. 2011, 218(1): 158-164.
[14]
D Kourtis, G Vingerhoets. Evidence for dissociable effects of handedness and consistency of hand preference in allocation of attention and movement planning: An EEG investigation. Neuropsychologia. 2016, 93(Pt B): 493-500.
[15]
M Cappelletti, HL Lee, ED Freeman, et al. The role of right and left parietal lobes in the conceptual processing of numbers. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010, 22(2): 331-346.
[16]
M Raymond, D Pontier. Is there geographical variation in human handedness? Laterality. 2004, 9(1): 35-51.
[17]
SG Ratti, RG Lario, EO Alvarez. Lateralized display of spontaneous behaviour induced by novelty in intact rats: Effects of geometrically different environments. J Neurorestoratology. 2018, 6: 93-98.
[18]
SG Ratti, AA Orozco, EO Alvarez. Lateralized exploratory behaviour, and exploration motivated by novelty after localized microinjections of ZnTe into the basolateral amygdala in the rat. Am J Neuroprot Neuroregen. 2016, 8(1): 79-85.
[19]
SG Ratti, M Cioccale, C Carignano, et al. Bioinorganic chemistry of trace elements: possible role in the epigenetic modulation of homoeostatic processes in complex organisms. Am J Neuroprotect Neuroregen. 2013, 5(1): 17-24.
[20]
SG Ratti, NM Vizioli, E Gaglio, et al. Biological effects of trace elements on lateralized exploratory activity, defensive behaviour, and epigenetic DNA molecular changes in maturing rats. Am J Neuroprotect Neuroregen. 2012, 4(2): 167-175.
[21]
SG Ratti, EO Alvarez. Selenium treatment modifies the epigenetic behavioural changes induced by chronic non-toxic administration of ZnTe to prepuberal rats. Am J Neuroprot Neuroregen. 2016, 8(1): 66-74.
[22]
WJ Conover. Practical Nonparametric Statistics, 3rd Edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1999.
[23]
National Research Council. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. National Academies Press, 2010.
[24]
CJ Foltz. Guidelines for assessing the health and condition of mice. Lab Animal. 1999, 28: 28-32.
[25]
SG Ratti, EO Alvarez. The behavioural responses displayed by litter rats after chronic administration of non-toxic concentrations of ZnTe to parent rats are mediated primarily by Te. Am J Neuroprotect Neuroregen. 2014, 6(1): 33-42.
[26]
YR Zhu, P Chen, HY Wan, et al. Selenium-chromium (VI) interaction regulates the contents and correlations of trace elements in chicken brain and serum. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2018, 181(1): 154-163.
[27]
GO Howell, CH Hill. Biological interaction of selenium with other trace elements in chicks. Environ Health Perspect.1978, 25: 147-150.
[28]
J Anastassopoulou. Metal–DNA interactions. J Mol Struct. 2003, 651–653: 19-26.
[29]
MA Zoroddu, T Kowalik-Jankowska, H Kozlowski, et al. Interaction of Ni(II) and Cu(II) with a metal binding sequence of histone H4: AKRHRK, a model of the H4 tail. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000, 1475(2): 163-168.
[30]
M Wagner, AD Toews, P Morell. Tellurite specifically affects squalene epoxidase: investigations examining the mechanism of tellurium-induced neuropathy. J Neurochem. 1995, 64(5): 2169-2176.
[31]
AD Toews, EB Roe, JF Goodrum, et al. Mol. Brain Res. 1997, 49: 113-119.
DOI
[32]
EC Stangherlin, AM Favero, G Zeni, et al. Exposure of mothers to diphenyl ditelluride during the suckling period changes behavioral tendencies in their offspring. Brain Res Bull. 2006, 69(3): 311-317.
[33]
B Sredni, R Geffen-Aricha, WZ Duan, et al. Multifunctional tellurium molecule protects and restores dopaminergic neurons in Parkinson's disease models. FASEB J. 2007, 21(8): 1870-1883.
[34]
K Schwarz, CM Foltz. Selenium as an integral part of factor 3 against dietary necrotic liver degeneration. J Am Chem Soc. 1957, 79: 3292-3293.
[35]
ND Solovyev. Importance of selenium and selenoprotein for brain function: From antioxidant protection to neuronal signaling. J Inorg Biochem. 2015, 153: 1-12.
[36]
M Kühbacher, J Bartel, B Hoppe, et al. The brain selenoproteome: priorities in the hierarchy and different levels of selenium homeostasis in the brain of selenium-deficient rats. J Neurochem. 2009, 110(1): 133-142.
[37]
MP Rayman. Selenium and human health. Lancet. 2012, 379(9822): 1256-1268.
[38]
HM Ying, Y Zhang. Systems biology of selenium and complex disease. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2019, 192(1): 38-50.
[39]
R Brigelius-Flohé, M Maiorino. Glutathioneperoxidases. BBA-Gen Subjects. 2013, 1830(5): 3289-3303.
[40]
BA Zachara, H Pawluk, E Bloch-Boguslawska, et al. Tissue level, distribution, and total body selenium content in healthy and diseased humans in Poland. Arch Environ Health. 2001, 56(5): 461-466.
[41]
JR Prohaska, HE Ganther. Selenium and glutathione peroxidase in developing rat brain. J Neurochem. 1976, 27(6): 1379-1387.
[42]
H Steinbrenner, H Sies. Selenium homeostasis and antioxidant selenoproteins in brain: implications for disorders in the central nervous system. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2013, 536(2): 152-157.
[43]
Y Zhang, Y Zhou, U Schweizer, et al. Comparative analysis of selenocysteine machinery and selenoproteome gene expression in mouse brain identifies neurons as key functional sites of selenium in mammals. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283(4): 2427-2438.
[44]
QJ Zhang, SF Zheng, SC Wang, et al. The effects of low selenium on DNA methylation in the tissues of chickens. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2019, 191(2): 474-484.
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 10 September 2019
Accepted: 14 November 2019
Published: 29 November 2019
Issue date: December 2019

Copyright

© The authors 2019

Acknowledgements

Present work was supported by Secretaría de Ciencia, Técnica y Postgrado of Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, and Consejo de Investigaciones de la Universidad del Aconcagua, Mendoza, Argentina.

Rights and permissions

This article is published with open access at http://jnr.tsinghuajournals.com

Return