AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (37.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

Advances in the development of piezoelectric smart aggregates for structural health monitoring

Jianpeng Jina,bWencheng Xuc,dPengfei Lie( )Yuya TakahashifFuyuan Gonga,b
State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China
CCCC Highway Consultants Co., Ltd., Beijing 100010, China
School of River and Ocean Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongging 400074, China
Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
Show Author Information

Abstract

In recent times, due to the rapid infrastructure development worldwide, the use of concrete has greatly increased. However, concrete structures face various risks such as dynamic forces from winds or earthquakes and environmental impacts such as corrosion. These challenges are more significant because of the saturation of infrastructure projects worldwide. To tackle these issues and ensure the long-term strength of structures, the field of structural health monitoring (SHM) has gained significance. One of the most promising technologies for SHM is smart aggregates (SAs). These are special materials that are embedded in concrete and serve three main purposes: monitoring early-age concrete strength, detecting impacts of various factors, and continuously monitoring the health of structures. SAs have several advantages regarding SHM, including being able to detect a wide frequency range, quick response times, cost-effective, and easy to manufacture and process. Because of these benefits, they are becoming widely used for SHM. In recent years, there have been significant improvements in SA technology. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the use of SAs for SHM. It also discusses the advances in SAs in the last 20 years regarding three main areas: technology development, measurement range, and wireless capabilities. Additionally, this article briefly discusses recent real-world uses of SAs for SHM. Finally, this article outlines potential future trends in the development of SA technology. It emphasizes the need for more research to better understand how these materials perform and how effective they are in different situations. This research is crucial for further advancements in ensuring the durability and safety of structures.

References

[1]
P. K. Mehta, P. J. M. Monteiro. Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials. 4th edn. New York (USA): McGraw-Hill Education, 2014.
[2]

K. Ohno, M. Ohtsu. Crack classification in concrete based on acoustic emission. Constr Build Mater, 2010, 24: 2339–2346.

[3]

S. Cao, E. Yilmaz, W. D. Song, et al. Loading rate effect on uniaxial compressive strength behavior and acoustic emission properties of cemented tailings backfill. Constr Build Mater, 2019, 213: 313–324.

[4]

H. Liu, C. X. Lin, J. Cui, et al. Detection and localization of rebar in concrete by deep learning using ground penetrating radar. Autom Constr, 2020, 118: 103279.

[5]

K. Dinh, N. Gucunski, T. Zayed. Automated visualization of concrete bridge deck condition from GPR data. NDT E Int, 2019, 102: 120–128.

[6]

H. B. Zhang, S. Hou, J. P. Ou. Feasibility of SA-based concrete seismic stress monitoring for high-strength concrete. J Intell Mater Syst Struct, 2017, 28: 2428–2436.

[7]

S. Hou, H. B. Zhang, J. P. Ou. SA-based concrete seismic stress monitoring: A case study for normal strength concrete. Smart Mater Struct, 2016, 25: 095041.

[8]

J. W. Ayres, F. Lalande, Z. Chaudhry, et al. Qualitative impedance-based health monitoring of civil infrastructures. Smart Mater Struct, 1998, 7: 599–605.

[9]

Q. Feng, Y. Liang, G. Song. Real-time monitoring of early-age concrete strength using piezoceramic-based smart aggregates. J Aerospace Eng, 2019, 32: 04018115.

[10]

A. Kocherla, K. V. L. Subramaniam. Embedded electrical impedance-based PZT sensor for monitoring hydrating concrete: Development and evaluation. Smart Mater Struct, 2020, 29: 055038.

[11]

W. Li, M. Luo, F. Chen. Early-age concrete strength development monitoring using piezoelectric self-emission and detection (SED) and coda wave energy (CWE). Smart Mater Struct, 2022, 31: 085003.

[12]

Y. Moslehy, H. Gu, A. Belarbi, et al. Smart aggregate based damage detection of circular RC columns under cyclic combined loading. Smart Mater Struct, 2010, 19: 065021.

[13]

M. X. He, F. H. Wu, X. D. Liu, et al. Study on early-age strength monitoring of concrete filled steel tube based on piezoelectric ceramic. Piezoelectr Acoustoopt, 2016, 38: 979–982. (in Chinese)

[14]

V. Sethi, G. B. Song. Multimodal vibration control of a flexible structure using piezoceramic sensor and actuator. J Intell Mater Syst Struct, 2008, 19: 573–582.

[15]

W. I. Liao, J. X. Wang, G. Song, et al. Structural health monitoring of concrete columns subjected to seismic excitations using piezoceramic-based sensors. Smart Mater Struct, 2011, 20: 125015.

[16]

Q. Z. Kong, R. H. Robert, P. Silva, et al. Cyclic crack monitoring of a reinforced concrete column under simulated pseudo-dynamic loading using piezoceramic-based smart aggregates. Appl Sci, 2016, 6: 341.

[17]

M. E. Voutetaki, N. A. Papadopoulos, G. M. Angeli, et al. Investigation of a new experimental method for damage assessment of RC beams failing in shear using piezoelectric transducers. Eng Struct, 2016, 114: 226–240.

[18]
H. S. Lew, S. G. Fattal, J. R. Shaver, et al. Investigation of Construction Failure of Reinforced Concrete Cooling Tower at Willow Island, West Virginia. Final Report. Washington, USA: National Engineering Lab., 1979.
[19]

X. M. Qin, S. S. Roy, H. B. Xiong, et al. Multidirectional crack monitoring of concrete structures using 3D piezoceramic sensing array. Struct Control Health Monit, 2022, 29: e3041.

[20]

H. Zhang, J. J. Li, F. Kang, et al. Monitoring and evaluation of the repair quality of concrete cracks using piezoelectric smart aggregates. Constr Build Mater, 2022, 317: 125775.

[21]

T. Y. Jiang, Y. Hong, J. B. Zheng, et al. Crack detection of FRP-reinforced concrete beam using embedded piezoceramic smart aggregates. Sensors, 2019, 19: 1979.

[22]

G. B. Song, H. C. Gu, Y. L. Mo. Smart aggregates: Multi-functional sensors for concrete structures—A tutorial and a review. Smart Mater Struct, 2008, 17: 033001.

[23]

L. Z. Zhou, Y. Zheng, H. W. Ma, et al. Attenuation characteristics of stress wave in cracked concrete beam using smart aggregate transducers enabled time-reversal technique. J Intell Mater Syst Struct, 2021, 32: 473–485.

[24]

W. H. Gao, H. N. Li, S. C. M. Ho. A novel embeddable tubular piezoceramics-based smart aggregate for damage detection in two-dimensional concrete structures. Sensors, 2019, 19: 1501.

[25]

S. Y. Zhao, S. L. Fan, J. Yang, et al. A spherical smart aggregate sensor based electro–mechanical impedance method for quantitative damage evaluation of concrete. Struct Health Monit, 2020, 19: 1560–1576.

[26]

H. B. Xu, L. J. Wen, J. J. Wang, et al. Modeling and electromechanical performance of improved smart aggregates using piezoelectric stacks. J Phys D: Appl Phys, 2023, 56: 054002.

[27]

G. T. Lu, X. Zhu, T. Wang, et al. Design and analysis of a novel piezoceramic stack-based smart aggregate. Sensors, 2020, 20: 6438.

[28]

J. Chen, P. Li, G. B. Song, et al. Piezo-based wireless sensor network for early-age concrete strength monitoring. Optik, 2016, 127: 2983–2987.

[29]

S. F. Jiang, J. Wang, S. Y. Tong, et al. Damage monitoring of concrete laminated interface using piezoelectric-based smart aggregate. Eng Struct, 2021, 228: 111489.

[30]

H. Zhang, J. J. Li, F. Kang. Real-time monitoring of humidity inside concrete structures utilizing embedded smart aggregates. Constr Build Mater, 2022, 331: 127317.

[31]

H. E. Meng, W. W. Yang, X. Yang. Real-time damage monitoring of double-tube concrete column under axial force. Arab J Sci Eng, 2022, 47: 12711–12728.

[32]

S. Siu, J. Qing, K. Wang, et al. Stress wave communication in concrete: II. Evaluation of low voltage concrete stress wave communications utilizing spectrally efficient modulation schemes with PZT transducers. Smart Mater Struct, 2014, 23: 125031.

[33]

Z. Sun, C. C. Chang. Structural damage assessment based on wavelet packet transform. J Struct Eng, 2002, 128: 1354–1361.

[34]

C. K. Soh, K. K. H. Tseng, S. Bhalla, et al. Performance of smart piezoceramic patches in health monitoring of a RC bridge. Smart Mater Struct, 2000, 9: 533–542.

[35]

N. Marković, T. Nestorović, D. Stojić, et al. Hybrid approach for two dimensional damage localization using piezoelectric smart aggregates. Mech Res Commun, 2017, 85: 69–75.

[36]

C. Liang, F. P. Sun, C. A. Rogers. Coupled electro–mechanical analysis of adaptive material systems-determination of the actuator power consumption and system energy transfer. J Intell Mater Syst Struct, 1997, 8: 335–343.

[37]

G. Park, H. H. Cudney, D. J. Inman. Feasibility of using impedance-based damage assessment for pipeline structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 2001, 30: 1463–1474.

[38]

J. B. Ihn, F. K. Chang. Detection and monitoring of hidden fatigue crack growth using a built-in piezoelectric sensor/actuator network: II. Validation using riveted joints and repair patches. Smart Mater Struct, 2004, 13: 621–630.

[39]

Y. Z. Chen, X. W. Xue. Advances in the structural health monitoring of bridges using piezoelectric transducers. Sensors, 2018, 18: 4312.

[40]

Y. Y. Lim, C. K. Soh. Electro–mechanical impedance (EMI)-based incipient crack monitoring and critical crack identification of beam structures. Res Nondestr Eval, 2014, 25: 82–98.

[41]

V. G. M. Annamdas, C. K. Soh. Application of electromechanical impedance technique for engineering structures: Review and future issues. J Intell Mater Syst Struct, 2010, 21: 41–59.

[42]

J. C. Wu, W. J. Li, Q. Feng. Electro–mechanical impedance (EMI) based interlayer slide detection using piezoceramic smart aggregates—A feasibility study. Sensors, 2018, 18: 3524.

[43]

Y. W. Yang, H. Liu, V. G. M. Annamdas, et al. Monitoring damage propagation using PZT impedance transducers. Smart Mater Struct, 2009, 18: 045003.

[44]

B. S. Divsholi, Y. W. Yang. Combined embedded and surface-bonded piezoelectric transducers for monitoring of concrete structures. NDT E Int, 2014, 65: 28–34.

[45]

R. L. Wang, H. Gu, Y. L. Mo, et al. Proof-of-concept experimental study of damage detection of concrete piles using embedded piezoceramic transducers. Smart Mater Struct, 2013, 22: 042001.

[46]

W. I. Liao, C. H. Lin, J. S. Hwang, et al. Seismic health monitoring of RC frame structures using smart aggregates. Earthq Eng Eng Vib, 2013, 12: 25–32.

[47]

B. Xu, B. Li, G. B. Song. Active debonding detection for large rectangular CFSTs based on wavelet packet energy spectrum with piezoceramics. J Struct Eng, 2013, 139: 1435–1443.

[48]

T. J. Liu, D. J. Zou, C. C. Du, et al. Influence of axial loads on the health monitoring of concrete structures using embedded piezoelectric transducers. Struct Health Monit, 2017, 16: 202–214.

[49]

N. Markovic, T. Nestorovic, D. Stojic. Numerical modeling of damage detection in concrete beams using piezoelectric patches. Mech Res Commun, 2015, 64: 15–22.

[50]

C. Dumoulin, G. Karaiskos, J. Y. Sener, et al. Online monitoring of cracking in concrete structures using embedded piezoelectric transducers. Smart Mater Struct, 2014, 23: 115016.

[51]

S. Hou, H. B. Zhang, J. P. Ou. A PZT-based smart aggregate for compressive seismic stress monitoring. Smart Mater Struct, 2012, 21: 105035.

[52]

B. Chen, T. H. Liu, W. T. Chu, et al. Sensing experiment and simulation for cracks in hydraulic concrete based on piezoelectric smart aggregates. Adv Sci Technol Water Resour, 2021, 41: 1–6. (in Chinese)

[53]

Q. Z. Kong, R. L. Wang, G. B. Song, et al. Monitoring the soil freeze–thaw process using piezoceramic-based smart aggregate. J Cold Reg Eng, 2014, 28: 06014001.

[54]

Q. Z. Kong, S. Hou, Q. Ji, et al. Very early age concrete hydration characterization monitoring using piezoceramic based smart aggregates. Smart Mater Struct, 2013, 22: 085025.

[55]

J. J. Wang, Q. Z. Kong, Z. F. Shi, et al. Electromechanical properties of smart aggregate: Theoretical modeling and experimental validation. Smart Mater Struct, 2016, 25: 095008.

[56]

S. Hou, Z. H. Kong, B. Wu, et al. Compactness monitoring of compound concrete filled with demolished concrete lumps using PZT-based smart aggregates. J Aerosp Eng, 2018, 31: 04018064.

[57]

Z. J. Wang, L. Wei, M. S. Cao. Damage quantification with embedded piezoelectric aggregates based on wavelet packet energy analysis. Sensors, 2019, 19: 425.

[58]

S. Alkoy. Fabrication and properties of thin-shell monolithic piezoelectric ceramic transducers. J Mater Sci, 2007, 42: 6742–6748.

[59]

V. G. Savin, I. O. Morgun. Electric to acoustic conversion by a spherical piezoceramic shell with shields. Int Appl Mech, 2007, 43: 238–245.

[60]

R. Jr. Meyer, H. Weitzing, Q. C. Xu, et al. Lead zirconate titanate hollow-sphere transducers. J Am Ceram Soc, 1994, 77: 1669–1672.

[61]

J. O. Kim, J. G. Lee, H. Y. Chun. Radial vibration characteristics of spherical piezoelectric transducers. Ultrasonics, 2005, 43: 531–537.

[62]

X. F. Li, X. L. Peng, K. Y. Lee. The static response of functionally graded radially polarized piezoelectric spherical shells as sensors and actuators. Smart Mater Struct, 2010, 19: 035010.

[63]

Q. Z. Kong, S. L. Fan, X. L. Bai, et al. A novel embeddable spherical smart aggregate for structural health monitoring: Part I. Fabrication and electrical characterization. Smart Mater Struct, 2017, 26: 095050.

[64]

Q. Z. Kong, S. L. Fan, Y. L. Mo, et al. A novel embeddable spherical smart aggregate for structural health monitoring: Part II. Numerical and experimental verifications. Smart Mater Struct, 2017, 26: 095051.

[65]

J. J. Wang, Q. Z. Kong, Z. F. Shi, et al. A theoretical model for designing the novel embeddable spherical smart aggregate. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 48403–48417.

[66]

W. H. Gao, L. S. Huo, H. N. Li, et al. Smart concrete slabs with embedded tubular PZT transducers for damage detection. Smart Mater Struct, 2018, 27: 025002.

[67]

W. H. Gao, L. S. Huo, H. N. Li, et al. An embedded tubular PZT transducer based damage imaging method for two-dimensional concrete structures. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 30100–30109.

[68]

G. T. Lu, Q. Wang, H. J. Song, et al. Actuating performance analysis of a new smart aggregate using piezoceramic stack. Appl Sci, 2021, 11: 9599.

[69]

J. Chen, P. Li, G. B. Song, et al. Feedback control for structural health monitoring in a smart aggregate based sensor network. Int J Struct Stab Dyn, 2018, 18: 1850064.

[70]

S. Yan, H. Y. Ma, P. Li, et al. Development and application of a structural health monitoring system based on wireless smart aggregates. Sensors, 2017, 17: 1641.

[71]

X. J. Sun, S. Q. Wang, J. P. Jin, et al. Computational methods of mass transport in concrete under stress and crack conditions: A review. J Intell Constr, 2023, 1: 9180015.

[72]

T. Y. Jiang, Q. Z. Kong, Z. Peng, et al. Monitoring of corrosion-induced degradation in prestressed concrete structure using embedded piezoceramic-based transducers. IEEE Sensors J, 2017, 17: 5823–5830.

[73]

Q. Zhai, J. C. Zhang, J. H. Xiao, et al. Feasibility of piezoceramic transducer-enabled active sensing for the monitoring cross-shaped concrete filled steel tubular (CCFST) columns under cyclic loading. Measurement, 2021, 182: 109646.

[74]

Q. Feng, Q. Z. Kong, L. S. Huo, et al. Crack detection and leakage monitoring on reinforced concrete pipe. Smart Mater Struct, 2015, 24: 115020.

[75]

C. Dumoulin, A. Deraemaeker. Real-time fast ultrasonic monitoring of concrete cracking using embedded piezoelectric transducers. Smart Mater Struct, 2017, 26: 104006.

[76]

H. Zhang, J. J. Li, F. Kang. Crack damage monitoring of concrete beam based on piezoelectric intelligent aggregate. J Vib Shock, 2021, 40: 215–222. (in Chinese)

[77]

J. C. Liang, B. Chen, C. F. Shao, et al. Time reverse modeling of damage detection in underwater concrete beams using piezoelectric intelligent modules. Sensors, 2020, 20: 7318.

[78]

T. J. Saravanan, K. Balamonica, C. B. Priya, et al. Piezoelectric EMI-based monitoring of early strength gain in concrete and damage detection in structural components. J Infrastruct Syst, 2017, 23: 04017029.

[79]

S. L. Fan, S. Y. Zhao, Q. Z. Kong, et al. An embeddable spherical smart aggregate for monitoring concrete hydration in very early age based on electromechanical impedance method. J Intell Mater Syst Struct, 2021, 32: 537–548.

[80]

G. P. Li, M. Z. Luo, J. P. Huang, et al. Early-age concrete strength monitoring using smart aggregate based on electromechanical impedance and machine learning. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2023, 186: 109865.

[81]

Z. Q. Yang, W. H. Gao, M. L. Li, et al. Monitoring and modeling the hydration of steel fibre-reinforced cement-based material in very early age. Compos Struct, 2023, 311: 116780.

[82]

Z. S. Tang, Y. Y. Lim, S. T. Smith, et al. Monitoring the curing process of in-situ concrete with piezoelectric-based techniques—A practical application. Struct Health Monit, 2023, 22: 518–539.

[83]

J. C. Zhang, C. Zhang, J. H. Xiao, et al. A PZT-based electromechanical impedance method for monitoring the soil freeze–thaw process. Sensors, 2019, 19: 1107.

[84]

C. M. Lan, S. Zhuang, S. Han, et al. Monitoring of soil water content using spherical smart aggregates based on electromechanical impedance (EMI) technique. Smart Mater Struct, 2023, 32: 074002.

[85]
J. S. Jia, W. A. Baah, C. Y. Zheng, et al. New stress–strain model and intelligent quality control technology for cemented material dam. J Intell Constr, in press, https://doi.org/10.26599/JIC.2023.9180033.
[86]

F. Y. Gong, X. J. Sun, Y. Takahashi, et al. Computational modeling of combined frost damage and alkali–silica reaction on the durability and fatigue life of RC bridge decks. J Intell Constr, 2023, 1: 9180001.

[87]

W. K. Dong, W. G. Li, Z. Tao, et al. Piezoresistive properties of cement-based sensors: Review and perspective. Constr Build Mater, 2019, 203: 146–163.

[88]

Z. Wang, F. Y. Gong, K. Maekawa. Multi-scale and multi-chemo–physics lifecycle evaluation of structural concrete under environmental and mechanical impacts. J Intell Constr, 2023, 1: 9180003.

Journal of Intelligent Construction
Article number: 9180016
Cite this article:
Jin J, Xu W, Li P, et al. Advances in the development of piezoelectric smart aggregates for structural health monitoring. Journal of Intelligent Construction, 2024, 2(3): 9180016. https://doi.org/10.26599/JIC.2024.9180016

2656

Views

423

Downloads

0

Crossref

Altmetrics

Received: 18 November 2023
Revised: 30 January 2024
Accepted: 06 February 2024
Published: 18 June 2024
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Tsinghua University Press.

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Return