Journal Home > Volume 1 , Issue 3
Journal of Intelligent Construction 2023, 1(3): 9180016 https://doi.org/10.26599/JIC.2023.9180016
Research Article | Open Access | Issue | Published: 13 September 2023

Microseismic source location based on improved artificial bee colony algorithm: Performance analysis and case study

Show Author's Information Peng Zhang1,  Nuwen Xu1( ),  Peiwei Xiao1,2,  Tao Zhao3,  Furong Gao2,  Xinchao Ding4,  Biao Li5( )
State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, College of Water Resource and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
CHN Energy Jinsha River Xulong Hydropower Co., Ltd., Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture of Garzê 627950, China
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brunel University, London UB8 3PH, UK
PowerChina Northwest Engineering Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710065, China
School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
Keywords:
underground engineering, microseismic (MS) location, signal denoising arrival time picking, artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm
Cite this article:
Zhang P, Xu N, Xiao P, et al. Microseismic source location based on improved artificial bee colony algorithm: Performance analysis and case study. Journal of Intelligent Construction, 2023, 1(3): 9180016. https://doi.org/10.26599/JIC.2023.9180016
Download citation
EndNote(RIS)
BibTeX

1576

Views

225

Downloads

Citations

1

Crossref

N/A

WoS

N/A

Scopus

N/A

CSCD

Abstract Full text About this article

Highly accurate microseismic (MS) localization is the basis for rock damage assessment and disaster warning. The engineering background noise mixed in the MS signal (s(ε)) seriously affects the subsequent analysis of the MS signal. A noise reduction method of singular spectral analysis–complementary ensemble empirical mode decomposition–wavelet threshold (SSA–CEEMD–WT) is proposed. The CEEMD, CEEMD–WT, and proposed methods are used for denoising the noisy Ricker wavelet. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the denoised signal (xde(ε)) by the proposed method is 56.77% and 37.88% higher than those of CEEMD and CEEMD–WT methods, respectively. Moreover, an adaptive artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm is applied for MS source (O(h0, y0, z0)) location. The time to quantile difference is introduced as the objective function. The blast positioning test results prove that the proposed method improves the positioning accuracy of particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm and simulated annealing PSO (SA-PSO) algorithm by 44.12% and 47.64%, respectively. The MS positions of underground caverns reveal that the calculated clusters of MS events using the adaptive ABC algorithm are more concentrated at the structural plane and appearance deformation failure location and in good agreement with field survey and routine monitoring data.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Microseismic source location based on improved artificial bee colony algorithm: Performance analysis and case study

Show Author's information Peng Zhang1, Nuwen Xu1( ), Peiwei Xiao1,2, Tao Zhao3, Furong Gao2, Xinchao Ding4, Biao Li5( )
State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, College of Water Resource and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
CHN Energy Jinsha River Xulong Hydropower Co., Ltd., Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture of Garzê 627950, China
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brunel University, London UB8 3PH, UK
PowerChina Northwest Engineering Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710065, China
School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China

Abstract

Highly accurate microseismic (MS) localization is the basis for rock damage assessment and disaster warning. The engineering background noise mixed in the MS signal (s(ε)) seriously affects the subsequent analysis of the MS signal. A noise reduction method of singular spectral analysis–complementary ensemble empirical mode decomposition–wavelet threshold (SSA–CEEMD–WT) is proposed. The CEEMD, CEEMD–WT, and proposed methods are used for denoising the noisy Ricker wavelet. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the denoised signal (xde(ε)) by the proposed method is 56.77% and 37.88% higher than those of CEEMD and CEEMD–WT methods, respectively. Moreover, an adaptive artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm is applied for MS source (O(h0, y0, z0)) location. The time to quantile difference is introduced as the objective function. The blast positioning test results prove that the proposed method improves the positioning accuracy of particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm and simulated annealing PSO (SA-PSO) algorithm by 44.12% and 47.64%, respectively. The MS positions of underground caverns reveal that the calculated clusters of MS events using the adaptive ABC algorithm are more concentrated at the structural plane and appearance deformation failure location and in good agreement with field survey and routine monitoring data.

Keywords: underground engineering, microseismic (MS) location, signal denoising arrival time picking, artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm

References(38)

[1]

H. S. Guo, Q. C. Sun, G. L. Feng, et al. In-situ observations of damage–fracture evolution in surrounding rock upon unloading in 2400-m-deep tunnels. Int J Min Sci Technol, 2023, 33: 437–446.
DOI Google Scholar
[2]

Q. Yu, D. C. Zhao, Y. J. Xia, et al. Multivariate early warning method for rockburst monitoring based on microseismic activity characteristics. Front Earth Sci, 2022, 10: 837333.
DOI Google Scholar
[3]

K. Ma, S. J. Wang, F. Z. Yuan, et al. Study on mechanism of influence of mining speed on roof movement based on microseismic monitoring. Adv Civ Eng, 2020, 2020: 8819824.
DOI Google Scholar
[4]
H. Y. Mao, N. W. Xu, X. Li, et al. Analysis of rockburst mechanism and warning based on microseismic moment tensors and dynamic Bayesian networks. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng, in press, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.12.005.
DOI
[5]

B. Li, N. W. Xu, P. W. Xiao, et al. Microseismic monitoring and forecasting of dynamic disasters in underground hydropower projects in southwest China: A review. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng, 2023, 15: 2158–2177.
DOI Google Scholar
[6]

X. T. Feng, B. R. Chen, H. J. Ming, et al. Evolution law and mechanism of rockburst in deep tunnel: Immediate rockburst. Chin J Rock Mech Eng, 2012, 31: 433–444.
Google Scholar
[7]

N. W. Xu, T. B. Li, F. Dai, et al. Microseismic monitoring and stability evaluation for the large scale underground caverns at the Houziyan hydropower station in southwest China. Eng Geol, 2015, 188: 48–67.
DOI Google Scholar
[8]

L. J. Dong, J. Wesseloo, Y. Potvin, et al. Discrimination of mine seismic events and blasts using the fisher classifier, naive Bayesian classifier and logistic regression. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 2016, 49: 183–211.
DOI Google Scholar
[9]
X. B. Li, Y. P. Zhang, Y. J. Zuo, et al. Filtering and denoising of rock blasting vibration signal with EMD. J Cent South Univ (Sci Technol), 2006, 37: 150–154. (in Chinese)
[10]

J. J. Han, M. van der Baan. Microseismic and seismic denoising via ensemble empirical mode decomposition and adaptive thresholding. Geophysics, 2015, 80: KS69–KS80.
DOI Google Scholar
[11]

S. B. Tang, S. Ding, J. M. Li, et al. An improved microseismic signal denoising method of rock failure for deeply buried energy exploration. Energies, 2023, 16: 2274.
DOI Google Scholar
[12]

J. Zheng, L. B. Meng, Y. Sun, et al. GPU-acceleration 3D rotated–staggered–grid solutions to microseismic anisotropic wave equation with moment tensor implementation. Int J Min Sci Technol, 2023, 33: 403–410.
DOI Google Scholar
[13]

Y. P. Sun, H. J. Su, P. W. Xiao, et al. Visualization and early warning analysis of damage degree of surrounding rock mass in underground powerhouse. Int J Min Sci Technol, 2023, 33: 717–731.
DOI Google Scholar
[14]

L. Geiger. Probability method for the determination of earthquake epicenters from the arrival time only. Bull St Louis Univ, 1912, 8: 56–71.
Google Scholar
[15]

A. Lurka, P. Swanson. Improvements in seismic event locations in a deep western U.S. coal mine using tomographic velocity models and an evolutionary search algorithm. Min Sci Technol (China), 2009, 19: 599–603.
DOI Google Scholar
[16]

S. Cong, Y. H. Wang, J. Y. Cheng. Coal mine microseismic velocity model inversion based on first arrival time difference. Arab J Geosci, 2019, 12: 5.
DOI Google Scholar
[17]

D. Wamriew, M. Charara, D. Pissarenko. Joint event location and velocity model update in real-time for downhole microseismic monitoring: A deep learning approach. Comput Geosci, 2022, 158: 104965.
DOI Google Scholar
[18]

K. Peng, H. Y. Guo, X. Y. Shang. Microseismic source location using the log–cosh function and distant sensor-removed P-wave arrival data. J Cent South Univ, 2022, 29: 712–725.
DOI Google Scholar
[19]

Y. C. Rui, Z. L. Zhou, J. Y. Lu, et al. A novel AE source localization method using clustering detection to eliminate abnormal arrivals. Int J Min Sci Technol, 2022, 32: 51–62.
DOI Google Scholar
[20]
S. Y. Gong, L. M. Dou, A. Y. Cao, et al. Study on optimal configuration of seismological observation network for coal mine. Chinese J Geophys, 2010, 53: 457–465. (in Chinese)
[21]

N. Li, M. C. Ge, E. Y. Wang, et al. The influence mechanism and optimization of the sensor network on the MS/AE source location. Shock Vib, 2020, 2020: 2651214.
DOI Google Scholar
[22]

J. Ward Neale, N. Harmon, M. Srokosz. Improving microseismic P wave source location with multiple seismic arrays. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth, 2018, 123: 476–492.
DOI Google Scholar
[23]

Y. Wang, K. C. Ho. TDOA source localization in the presence of synchronization clock bias and sensor position errors. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2013, 61: 4532–4544.
DOI Google Scholar
[24]

Y. Lin, H. J. Zhang, X. F. Jia. Target-oriented imaging of hydraulic fractures by applying the staining algorithm for downhole microseismic migration. J Appl Geophys, 2018, 150: 278–283.
DOI Google Scholar
[25]

Y. L. Ding, L. M. Dou, W. Cai, et al. Signal characteristics of coal and rock dynamics with micro-seismic monitoring technique. Int J Min Sci Technol, 2016, 26: 683–690.
DOI Google Scholar
[26]

N. E. Huang, Z. Shen, S. R. Long, et al. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc Roy Soc Lond A, 1998, 454: 903–995.
DOI Google Scholar
[27]

Y. B. Li, M. Q. Xu, X. H. Liang, et al. Application of bandwidth EMD and adaptive multiscale morphology analysis for incipient fault diagnosis of rolling bearings. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2017, 64(8): 6506–6517.
DOI Google Scholar
[28]

J. R. Yeh, J. S. Shieh, N. E. Huang. Complementary ensemble empirical mode decomposition: A novel noise enhanced data analysis method. Adv Adapt Data Anal, 2010, 2: 135–156.
DOI Google Scholar
[29]

J. S. Richman, J. R. Moorman. Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 2000, 278: H2039–H2049.
DOI Google Scholar
[30]

R. Vautard, P. Yiou, M. Ghil. Singular-spectrum analysis: A toolkit for short, noisy chaotic signals. Phys D: Nonlinear Phenom, 1992, 158: 95–126.
DOI Google Scholar
[31]

R. Allen. Automatic phase pickers: Their present use and future prospects. Bull Seismol Soc Am, 1982, 72: S225–S242.
DOI Google Scholar
[32]

R. Allen. Automatic earthquake recognition and timing from single traces. Bull Seismol Soc Am, 1978, 68: 1521–1532.
DOI Google Scholar
[33]

Y. Morita, H. Hamaguchi. Automatic detection of onset time of seismic waves and its confidence interval using the autoregressive model fitting. Zisin, 1984, 37: 281–293.
DOI Google Scholar
[34]

N. Maeda. A method for reading and checking phase time in auto-processing system of seismic wave data. Zisin, 1985, 38: 365–379.
DOI Google Scholar
[35]

X. B. Li, X. Y. Shang, Z. W. Wang, et al. Identifying P-phase arrivals with noise: An improved Kurtosis method based on DWT and STA/LTA. J Appl Geophys, 2016, 133: 50–61.
DOI Google Scholar
[36]
H. Luo, J. K. Yu, Y. S. Pan, et al. Seagull optimization based on quantile difference mine earthquake location method. Progress in Geophys, 2022, 37: 421–429. (in Chinese).
[37]
D. Karaboga. An Idea Based on Honey Bee Swarm for Numerical Optimization. Kayseri (Turkey): Erciyes University, 2005.
[38]

G. P. Zhu, S. Kwong. Gbest-guided artificial bee colony algorithm for numerical function optimization. Appl Math Comput, 2010, 217: 3166–3173.
DOI Google Scholar
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 28 June 2023
Revised: 30 July 2023
Accepted: 01 August 2023
Published: 13 September 2023
Issue date: September 2023

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Tsinghua University Press.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 42277461 and 42177143), Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province of China (No. 2022NSFSC0005), and Sichuan Science and Technology Program (No. 2023NSFSC0812).

Rights and permissions

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Return