AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (8.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Comparative evaluation of upscaled analytical and numerical models for DNAPL dissolution processes

Pan-rui Yang1,2Xiao-min Yuan1,2Hui-rong Guo3( )Bao-lan Li1,2Xing-quan Wang1,2Min Yuan3
School of Ecology and Environmental Science, Qinghai Institute of Technology, Xining 810016, China
Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Plateau Climate Change and Corresponding Ecological and Environmental Effects, Xining 810016, China
School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Mathematical model-based accurate evaluation of the remediation process at organic pollution sites serves as an efficient approach to the management and remediation of contaminant source zones. Numerical and upscaled analytical solution models are effective mathematical methods for reproducing the Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid (DNAPL) remediation process. However, in the current design of pollutant removal schemes, effective mass transfer models for characterizing the elution behaviors of contaminants remain lacking. In this study, two mathematical methods integrated with improved mass transfer models were employed to simulate the multi-stage contaminant elution behaviors under two distinct scenarios: A mixed-source region subjected to continuous water flushing and a residual DNAPL source treated with shorter-duration pulse flushing of the ethanol solution. Both the improved numerical model and upscaled analytical solution model demonstrated enhanced accuracy, which was attributed to the incorporation of solubilization mechanisms into mass transfer processes and the adoption of a multi-source region division method. The Mean Absolute Errors (MAE) of the numerical simulation for the two scenarios were 20.68 mg/L and 6.93 mg/L, respectively, whereas those of the upscaled model were 33.29 mg/L and 8.60 mg/L, respectively. Comparing the two improved models, the numerical model exhibited higher accuracy, while the upscaled model was characterized by faster computation speed and fewer input parameters.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering
Pages 382-398

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Yang P-r, Yuan X-m, Guo H-r, et al. Comparative evaluation of upscaled analytical and numerical models for DNAPL dissolution processes. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2026, 14(3): 382-398. https://doi.org/10.26599/JGSE.2026.9280088

11

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 05 August 2025
Accepted: 28 March 2026
Published: 30 July 2026
2305-7068/© 2026 Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering Editorial Office

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0)