AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

A state-of-the-art Fuzzy Nonlinear Additive Regression (FNAR) model for groundwater level prediction

Sepideh Zeraati Neyshabouri1, Abbas Khashei-Siuki1( ), Mohammad Ghasem Akbari2,3
Department of Water Engineering, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran
Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
Show Author Information

Abstract

Groundwater modeling remains challenging due to heterogeneity and complexity of aquifer systems, necessitating endeavors to quantify Groundwater Levels (GWL) dynamics to inform policymakers and hydrogeologists. This study introduces a novel Fuzzy Nonlinear Additive Regression (FNAR) model to predict monthly GWL in an unconfined aquifer in eastern Iran, using a 19-year (1998–2017) dataset from 11 piezometric wells. Under three distinct scenarios with progressively increasing input complexity, the study utilized readily available climate data, including Precipitation (Prc), Temperature (Tave), Relative Humidity (RH), and Evapotranspiration (ETo). The dataset was split into training (70%) and validation (30%) subsets. Results showed that among three input scenarios, Scenario 3 (Sc3, incorporating all four variables) achieved the best predictive performance, with RMSE ranging from 0.305 m to 0.768 m, MAE from 0.203 m to 0.522 m, NSE from 0.661 to 0.980, and PBIAS from 0.771% to 0.981%, indicating low bias and high reliability. However, Sc2 (excluding ETo) with RMSE ranging from 0.4226 m to 0.9909 m, MAE from 0.3418 m to 0.8173 m, NSE from 0.2831 to 0.9674, and PBIAS from −0.598% to 0.968% across different months offers practical advantages in data-scarce settings. The FNAR model outperforms conventional Fuzzy Least Squares Regression (FLSR) and holds promise for GWL forecasting in data-scarce regions where physical or numerical models are impractical. Future research should focus on integrating FNAR with deep learning algorithms and real-time data assimilation expanding applications across diverse hydrogeological settings.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering
Pages 83-99

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Neyshabouri SZ, Khashei-Siuki A, Akbari MG. A state-of-the-art Fuzzy Nonlinear Additive Regression (FNAR) model for groundwater level prediction. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2026, 14(1): 83-99. https://doi.org/10.26599/JGSE.2026.9280074

1461

Views

66

Downloads

1

Crossref

1

Web of Science

1

Scopus

Received: 15 May 2025
Accepted: 16 November 2025
Published: 15 January 2026
2305-7068/© 2026 Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering Editorial Office

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0)