AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Ecological vulnerability assessment and driving force analysis of small watersheds in Hilly Regions using sensitivity-resilience-pressure modeling

Jing-tao Shi1Ge Gao1Jun-jian Liu1( )Yu-ge Jiang1Bo Li1Xiao-yan Hao2Jun-chao Zhang3Zhao-yi Li4Huan Sun1
Langfang Natural Resources Comprehensive Survey Center, China Geological Survey, Langfang 065000, Hebei Province, China
Pingquan City Department of Natural Resources and Planning, Pingquan 067500, Hebei Province, China
Pingquan soil and water Conservation Construction Service Center, Pingquan 067500, Hebei Province, China
Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Pingquan City, the origin of five rivers, serves as the core water conservation zone for the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and exemplifies the characteristics of small watersheds in hilly areas. In recent years, excessive mining and intensified human activities have severely disrupted the local ecosystem, creating an urgent need for ecological vulnerability assessment to enhance water conservation functions. This study employed the sensitivity-resilience-pressure model, integrating various data sources, including regional background, hydro-meteorological data, field investigations, remote sensing analysis, and socio-economic data. The weights of the model indices were determined using an entropy weighting model that combines principal component analysis and the analytic hierarchy process. Using the ArcGIS platform, the spatial distribution and driving forces of ecological vulnerability in 2020 were analyzed, providing valuable insights for regional ecological restoration. The results indicated that the overall Ecological Vulnerability Index (EVI) was 0.389, signifying moderate ecological vulnerability, with significant variation between watersheds. The Daling River Basin had a high EVI, with ecological vulnerability primarily in levels IV and V, indicating high ecological pressure, whereas the Laoniu River Basin had a low EVI, reflecting minimal ecological pressure. Soil type was identified as the primary driving factor, followed by elevation, temperature, and soil erosion as secondary factors. It is recommended to focus on key regions and critical factors while conducting comprehensive monitoring and assessment to ensure the long-term success of ecological management efforts.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering
Pages 209-224

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Shi J-t, Gao G, Liu J-j, et al. Ecological vulnerability assessment and driving force analysis of small watersheds in Hilly Regions using sensitivity-resilience-pressure modeling. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2025, 13(3): 209-224. https://doi.org/10.26599/JGSE.2025.9280050

1541

Views

97

Downloads

1

Crossref

1

Web of Science

1

Scopus

Received: 16 October 2024
Accepted: 12 April 2025
Published: 27 June 2025
2305-7068/© 2025 Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering Editorial Office

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0)