AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access | Online First

Ecological Vulnerability Assessment and Driving Force Analysis of Small Watersheds in Hilly Regions Using Sensitivity-Resilience-Pressure Modeling

Jing-tao Shi1Ge Gao1Jun-jian Liu1( )Yu-ge Jiang1Bo Li1Xiao-yan Hao2Jun-chao Zhang3Zhao-yi Li4Huan Sun1
Langfang Natural Resources Comprehensive Survey Center, China Geological Survey, Langfang 065000, Hebei Province, China
Pingquan City Department of Natural Resources and Planning, Pingquan 067500, Hebei Province, China
Pingquan soil and water Conservation Construction Service Center, Pingquan 067500, Hebei Province, China
Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Pingquan City, the origin of five rivers, serves as the core water conservation zone for the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and exemplifies the characteristics of small watersheds in hilly areas. In recent years, excessive mining and intensified human activities have severely disrupted the local ecosystem, creating an urgent need for ecological vulnerability assessment to enhance water conservation functions. This study employed the sensitivity-resilience-pressure model, integrating various data sources, including regional background, hydro-meteorological data, field investigations, remote sensing analysis, and socio-economic data. The weights of the model indices were determined using an entropy weighting model that combines principal component analysis and the analytic hierarchy process. Using the ArcGIS platform, the spatial distribution and driving forces of ecological vulnerability in 2020 were analyzed, providing valuable insights for regional ecological restoration. The results indicated that the overall ecological vulnerability index (EVI) was 0.389, signifying moderate ecological vulnerability, with significant variation between watersheds. The Daling River Basin had a high EVI, with ecological vulnerability primarily in levels IV and V, indicating high ecological pressure, whereas the Laoniu River Basin had a low EVI, reflecting minimal ecological pressure. Soil type was identified as the primary driving factor, followed by elevation, temperature, and soil erosion as secondary factors. It is recommended to focus on key regions and critical factors while conducting comprehensive monitoring and assessment to ensure the long-term success of ecological management efforts.

References

 
Cui C. The Study of Ecological Environment Evolution and Countermeasures in Source Area of the Three Rivers. 2012. In Proceedings of the 5th International Yellow River Forum on Ensuring Water Right of the River's Demand and Healthy River Basin maintenance, Minist Water Resources, Yellow River Conservancy Commiss, Zhengzhou, China, 24–28 September.
 

De Lange HJ, Sala S, Vighi M, et al. 2010. Ecological vulnerability in risk assessment—A review and perspectives. Science of the Total Environment, 408(18): 3871−3879. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.11.009.

 
Fan ZW, Liu MS, Shen WQ, et al. 2009. GIS-based assessment on eco-vulnerability of Jiangxi Province. In 2009 International Conference on Environmental Science and Information Application Technology (Vol. 3, pp. 426–431). IEEE. DOI:10.1109/ESIAT.2009.321.
 
Gao Y and Zhang H, 2018. The study of ecological environment fragility based on remote sensing and GIS. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 46, 793–799. DOI:10.1007/s12524-018-0759-1.
 
Hou K, Li X, Wang J, et al. 2016. Evaluating Ecological Vulnerability Using the GIS and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method in Yan'an, China. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 25(2). DOI:10.15244/pjoes/61312.
 

Hou K, Li X, Zhang J. 2015. GIS analysis of changes in ecological vulnerability using a SPCA model in the Loess plateau of Northern Shaanxi, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(4): 4292−4305. DOI:10.3390/ijerph120404292.

 

Hu X, Ma C, Huang P, et al. 2021. Ecological vulnerability assessment based on AHP-PSR method and analysis of its single parameter sensitivity and spatial autocorrelation for ecological protection–A case of Weifang City, China. Ecological Indicators, 125: 107464. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107464.

 
Ippolito A, Sala S, Faber JH, et al. 2010. Ecological vulnerability analysis: a river basin case study. The Science of the Total Environment 408 (18), 3880–3890. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.002.
 

Jiang W, Deng L, Chen L, et al. 2009. Risk assessment and validation of flood disaster based on fuzzy mathematics. Progress in Natural Science, 19(10): 1419−1425. DOI:10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.12.010.

 

Lan G, Jiang X, Xu D, et al. 2023. Ecological vulnerability assessment based on remote sensing ecological index (RSEI): A case of Zhongxian County, Chongqing. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10: 1074376. DOI:10.3389/fenvs.2022.1074376.

 
Leitao AB and Ahern J, 2002. Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59(2), 65–93. DOI:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00005-1.
 

Li A, Wang A, Liang S, et al. 2006. Eco-environmental vulnerability evaluation in mountainous region using remote sensing and GIS—A case study in the upper reaches of Minjiang River, China. Ecological Modelling, 192(1-2): 175−187. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.07.005.

 

Li AN, Wang AS, He XR, et al. 2006. Integrated evaluation model for eco-environmental quality in mountainous region Based on Remote Sensing and GIS. Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, 11(4): 969−976. DOI:10.1007/BF02830196.

 

Li L, Shi ZH, Yin W, et al. 2009. A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to eco-environmental vulnerability assessment for the danjiangkou reservoir area, China. Ecological Modelling, 220(23): 3439−3447. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.09.005.

 
Li Y and Huang S, 2015. Landscape ecological risk responses to land use change in the Luanhe River Basin, China. Sustainability, 7(12), 16631–16652. DOI:10.3390/su71215835.
 

Luo M, Jia X, Zhao Y, et al. 2024. Ecological vulnerability assessment and its driving force based on ecological zoning in the Loess Plateau, China. Ecological Indicators, 159: 111658. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111658.

 

Qiu PH, Xu XJ, Xie GZ, et al. 2007. Analysis of the ecological vulnerability of the western Hainan Island based on its landscape pattern and ecosystem sensitivity. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 27(4): 1257−1264. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2032(07)60026-2.

 

Sahoo S, Dhar A, Kar A. 2016. Environmental vulnerability assessment using Grey Analytic Hierarchy Process based model. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 56: 145−154. DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2015.10.002.

 

Shan C, Dong Z, Lu D, et al. 2021. Study on river health assessment based on a fuzzy matter-element extension model. Ecological Indicators, 127: 107742. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107742.

 

Shi JT, Liu JJ, Zhang JC, et al. 2024. Analysis of soil heavy metal influencing factors and sources in typical small watersheds in shallow mountainous area. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 48(3): 834−846. (in Chinese) DOI:10.11720/wtyht.2024.1270.

 

Wang XD, Zhang XH, Gao P. 2010. A GIS-based decision support system for regional eco-security assessment and its application on the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(10): 1981−1990. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.05.006.

 
Wang Z and Su Y, 2002. Analysis of Eco-environment vulnerability characteristics of Hanzhong City, near the water source midway along the route of the south-to-north water transfer project, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 38(02), 432–442. DOI:10.5846/stxb201609261944.
 

Wu C, Liu G, Huang C, et al. 2018. Ecological vulnerability assessment based on fuzzy analytical method and analytic hierarchy process in Yellow River Delta. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(5): 855. DOI:10.3390/ijerph15050855.

 
Xu W, Dong Z, Li D, et al. 2017. River health evaluation based on the Fuzzy matter-element extension assessment model. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 26(3). DOI:10.15244/pjoes/67369.
 

Xu X, Yang H, Yang D, et al. 2013. Assessing the impacts of climate variability and human activities on annual runoff in the Luan River basin, China. Hydrology Research, 44(5): 940−952. DOI:10.2166/nh.2013.144.

 

Xue, LQ, Wang J, Zhang L, et al. 2019. Spatiotemporal analysis of ecological vulnerability and management in the Tarim River Basin, China. Science of the Total Environment, 649: 876−888. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.321.

 

Zhang F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. 2017. Ecological vulnerability assessment based on multi-sources data and SD model in Yinma River Basin, China. Ecological Modelling, 349: 41−50. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.01.016.

 
Zhang H, Lin X, Yu G, et al. 2009. Ecological vulnerability assessment in the middle and lower reaches of the Hanjiang river basin. In 2009 3rd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (pp. 1-4). IEEE. DOI:10.1109/ICBBE.2009.5162677.
 
Zhang XL, Yu WB, Cai HS, et al. 2018. Review of the evaluation methods of regional eco-environmental vulnerability. Acta Ecol Sin. 38, 5970–5981. DOI:10.5846/stxb201708211502.
 

Zhang XQ, Wang LK, Fu XS, et al. 2017. Ecological vulnerability assessment based on PSSR in Yellow River Delta. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167: 1106−1111. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.106.

 

Zhang XY, Liu K, Wang S, et al. 2022. Spatiotemporal evolution of ecological vulnerability in the Yellow River Basin under ecological restoration initiatives. Ecological Indicators, 135: 108586. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108586.

 

Zhao Y, Liu L, Kang S, et al. 2021. Quantitative analysis of factors influencing spatial distribution of soil erosion based on geo-detector model under diverse geomorphological types. Land, 10(6): 604. DOI:10.3390/land10060604.

 
Zou T and Yoshino K, 2017. Environmental vulnerability evaluation using a spatial principal components approach in the Daxing'anling region, China. Ecological Indicators, 78, 405–415. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.039.
 

Zou T, Chang Y, Chen P, et al. 2021. Spatial-temporal variations of ecological vulnerability in Jilin Province (China), 2000 to 2018. Ecological Indicators, 133: 108429. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108429.

Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering
Cite this article:
Shi J-t, Gao G, Liu J-j, et al. Ecological Vulnerability Assessment and Driving Force Analysis of Small Watersheds in Hilly Regions Using Sensitivity-Resilience-Pressure Modeling. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2025, https://doi.org/10.26599/JGSE.2025.9280050

92

Views

8

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 16 October 2024
Accepted: 12 April 2025
Published: 27 June 2025
2305-7068/© 2025 Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering Editorial Office

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0)

Return