Journal Home > Volume 11 , Issue 2

This experimental study aimed to investigate the impact of water depth, inlet water temperature, and fins on the productivity of a pyramid solar still in producing distilled water. The experiment was conducted in three parts, where the first part explored the variation in water depth from 1 cm to 5 cm, the second part evaluated the effect of increasing inlet water temperature from 30°C to 50°C, and the third part added fins at the bottom of the still at a specific inlet water depth. Results showed that basin depth had a significant impact on the still’s production, with a maximum variation of 40.6% observed when the water level was changed from 1 cm to 5 cm. The daily freshwater production from the pyramid solar still ranged from 3.41 kg/m2 for a water depth of 1 cm to 2.02 kg/m2 for a depth of 5 cm. Adding fins at the bottom of the pyramid solar still led to a 7.5% increase in productivity, while adjusting the inlet water temperature from 30°C to 40°C and 50°C resulted in a 15.3% and 21.2% increase, respectively. These findings highlighted the essential factors that can influence the productivity of pyramid solar stills and can be valuable in designing and operating efficient water desalination and purification technologies.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Experimental investigation of the impact of water depth, inlet water temperature, and fins on the productivity of a Pyramid Solar Still

Show Author's information Yousef Al-Abed Allah Malik1( )Omar Abu Abbas Mohammad1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

This experimental study aimed to investigate the impact of water depth, inlet water temperature, and fins on the productivity of a pyramid solar still in producing distilled water. The experiment was conducted in three parts, where the first part explored the variation in water depth from 1 cm to 5 cm, the second part evaluated the effect of increasing inlet water temperature from 30°C to 50°C, and the third part added fins at the bottom of the still at a specific inlet water depth. Results showed that basin depth had a significant impact on the still’s production, with a maximum variation of 40.6% observed when the water level was changed from 1 cm to 5 cm. The daily freshwater production from the pyramid solar still ranged from 3.41 kg/m2 for a water depth of 1 cm to 2.02 kg/m2 for a depth of 5 cm. Adding fins at the bottom of the pyramid solar still led to a 7.5% increase in productivity, while adjusting the inlet water temperature from 30°C to 40°C and 50°C resulted in a 15.3% and 21.2% increase, respectively. These findings highlighted the essential factors that can influence the productivity of pyramid solar stills and can be valuable in designing and operating efficient water desalination and purification technologies.

Keywords: Efficiency, Desalination, Pyramid solar still, Basin depth, Freshwater

References(24)

Abdallah S, Abu-Khader MM, Badran O. 2009. Effect of various absorbing materials on the thermal performance of solar stills. Desalination, 242(1-3): 128−137. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2008.03.036.

Agrawal A, Rana RS, Srivastava PK. 2017. Heat transfer coefficients and productivity of a single slope single basin solar still in Indian climatic condition: Experimental and theoretical comparison. Resource-Efficient Technologies, 3(4): 466−482. DOI:10.1016/j.reffit.2017.05.003.

Ahmed ZAG. 2012. Enhancing the solar still using immersion type water heater productivity and the effect of external cooling fan in winter. Applied Solar Energy, 48(3): 193−200. DOI:10.3103/S0003701X12030048.

Arunkumar T, Vinothkumar K, Ahsan A, et al. 2012. Experimental study on various solar still designs. ISRN Renewable Energy.
DOI

Aybar HS. 2007. A review of desalination by solar still. Solar desalination for the 21st century. Springer, Dordrecht: 2007.207−214. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4020-5508-9_15.

Badran AA, Al-Hallaq IA, Salman IAE, et al. 2005. A solar still augmented with a flat-plate collector. Desalination, 172(3): 227−234. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2004.06.203.

Badran OO, Al-Tahaineh HA. 2005. The effect of coupling a flat-plate collector on the solar still productivity. Desalination, 183(1-3): 137−142. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2005.02.046.

Human Development Report. 2016. Human Development Report Human Development for Everyone. 2016.

Jani HK, Modi KV. 2019. Experimental performance evaluation of single basin dual slope solar still with circular and square cross-sectional hollow fins. Solar Energy, 179: 186−194. DOI:10.1016/j.solener.2018.12.054.

Kabeel AE, Sharshir SW, Abdelaziz GB, et al. 2019. Improving performance of tubular solar still by controlling the water depth and cover cooling. Journal of Cleaner Production.
DOI

Kabeel AE, El-Samadony YAF, Wael M, et al. 2018. Comparative study on the solar still performance utilizing different PCM. Desalination, 432: 89−96. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2018.01.016.

Khechekhouche A, Benhaoua B, Manokar M, et al. 2019. Sand dunes effect on the productivity of a single slope solar distiller. Heat and Mass Transfer, 1-10.
DOI

Kulandaivel KM, Karuppiah S. 2014. Single basin double slope solar still-year round performance prediction for local climatic conditions at southern India. Thermal Science, 18(2): 429−438.

Manokar AM, Taamneh Y, Kabeel AE, et al. 2019. Effect of water depth and insulation on the productivity of an acrylic pyramid solar still – An experimental study. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 100319.
DOI

Nayi KH, Modi KV. 2018. Pyramid solar still: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81: 136−148. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.004.

Phadatare MK, Verma SK. 2007. Influence of water depth on internal heat and mass transfer in a plastic solar still. Desalination, 217(1-3): 267−275. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2007.03.006.

Rajamanickam MR, Ragupathy A. 2012. Influence of water depth on internal heat and mass transfer in a double slope solar still. Energy Procedia, 14: 1701−1708. DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.12.1155.

Rubio-Cerda E, Porta-Gándara MA, Fetnandez-Zayas JL, et al. 2002. Thermal performance of the condensing covers in a triangular solar still. Renewable Energy, 27(2): 301−308. DOI:10.1016/S0960-1481(01)00196-3.

Taamneh Y, Taamneh MM. 2012. Performance of pyramid-shaped solar still: Experimental study. Desalination: 65−68. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2012.01.026.

Taamneh YM, Allah MAA. 2020. Experimental study on pyramid solar still utilizing different types of nano-particles. Desalination and Water Treatment, 198: 31−40. DOI:10.5004/dwt.2020.26013.

Voropoulos K, Mathioulakis E, Belessiotis V. 2003. Experimental investigation of the behavior of a solar still coupled with hot water storage tank. Desalination, 156(1-3): 315−322. DOI:10.1016/S0011-9164(03)00362-X.

Voropoulos K, Mathioulakis E, Belessiotis V. 2001. Experimental investigation of a solar still coupled with solar collectors. Desalination, 138(1-3): 103−110. DOI:10.1016/S0011-9164(01)00251-X.

Velmurugana V, Deenadayalan CK, Vinod H, et al. 2008. Desalination of effluent using fin type solar still. Energy, 33(11): 1719−1727. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2008.07.001.

Velmurugan V, Gopalakrishnan M, Raghu R, et al. 2008. Single basin solar still with fin for enhancing productivity. Energy Conversion and Management, 49(10): 2602−2608. DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2008.05.010.

Publication history
Copyright
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 15 June 2022
Accepted: 03 April 2023
Published: 15 June 2023
Issue date: June 2023

Copyright

© 2023 Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering Editorial Office

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0)

Return