AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline

Comparison between Neuman (1975) and Jacob (1946) application for analysing pumping test data of unconfined aquifer

Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Salahaddin, Erbil, Kurdistan Region of Iraq
General Directorate of Dams and Reservoirs, Ministry of Agricultural and Water Resources, Erbil, Kurdistan region of Iraq
Show Author Information

Abstract

Pumping test of a water table aquifer is carried out to estimate the aquifer parameters, the obtained data were analysed through the solution of both Neuman (1975) and Jacob (1946) methods through AQTESOLV and Spreadsheet programs, the results of each methods are compared to evaluate the applicability and accuracy of the solution theoretically and practically. In the paper an example is presented, which is conducted for a constant rate pumping test from Ohio, in Fairborn (near Dayton), and it supplied by S.E. Norris (U.S. Geological Survey, Columbus, Ohio). The main objective of this study is to introduce both program and the way of the applications, and compare the results and the hand on of both programs in the field.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering
Pages 165-173

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Dana M, Jwan M. Comparison between Neuman (1975) and Jacob (1946) application for analysing pumping test data of unconfined aquifer. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2016, 4(3): 165-173. https://doi.org/10.26599/JGSE.2016.9280020

1436

Views

53

Downloads

1

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Published: 28 September 2016
© 2016 Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering Editorial Office