AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline

Capillary Pressure and Relative Permeability Model Uncertainties in Simulations of Geological CO2 Sequestration

Chuan LU( )Long LIYan-guang LIUGui-ling WANG
The Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, CAGS, Shijiazhuang, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Precise descriptions of saturation, capillary pressure and relative permeability s-pc-kr relations are essential for predictions and simulations on multiphase flow system. The primary object of this work is to investigate their influence on geological CO2 sequestration processes. Five types of commonly used s-pc-kr relations are examined in this study. Simulation results show significant influences of s-pc-kr relations on 1) the location and saturation of displacement fronts, 2) buoyancy driven migration speed, 3) horizontal spreading distance and the rate of dissolution of supercritical CO2. The effects of capillary pressure on the horizontal spreading of supercritical CO2 plume and its dissolution rate was resolved in this study for the 1st time in literatures. Simulation results of subsurface CO2 storage suggest that that careful selection of s-pc-kr relations and calibration methods are essential for accurate predictions.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering
Pages 1-17

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
LU C, LI L, LIU Y-g, et al. Capillary Pressure and Relative Permeability Model Uncertainties in Simulations of Geological CO2 Sequestration. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2014, 2(2): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.26599/JGSE.2014.9280013

951

Views

71

Downloads

0

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Published: 28 June 2014
© 2014 Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering Editorial Office