AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (15.6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Strong-bond networks and basal-cleavage resistance govern strength–toughness balance and elevated-temperature retention in Ta-based medium-entropy 211 MAX ceramics

Lu Liu1, Qifeng Zhuang1, Xiyu Xiao2, Wei Ding1, Haoran Zhou2, Xuefang Yin2, Kaicheng Zhang3, Baoze Zhao1, Shun Dong4( ), Guobing Ying1,3( )
Department of Engineering Mechanics, College of Mechanics and Engineering Science, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Changzhou 213200, China
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Composites in Special Environments, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Ta-containing Mn+1AXn (MAX) phases are promising high-temperature structural ceramics, but high density and concurrent optimization of strength, fracture toughness, and elevated-temperature property retention remain challenging. Entropy engineering can tailor M-site chemistry; however, it remains unclear how M-site combinations control the strength–toughness balance and elevated-temperature retention. Here, (TaNbV)2AlC, (TaTiNb)2AlC, (TaTiV)2AlC, and (TaTiNbV)2AlC were synthesized by vacuum hot pressing (HP) and investigated through phase and microstructural characterization, density functional theory (DFT)-based crystal orbital Hamilton population (COHP) analysis, deep potential molecular dynamics (DP-MD), and mechanics-based bridging models. Characterization confirmed a layered M2AlC-type framework and showed no obvious M-site elemental segregation within the examined regions. Compared with Ta2AlC, all medium-entropy ceramics showed reduced density and improved room-temperature flexural strength and fracture toughness, with (TaNbV)2AlC achieving 578 MPa and 8.5 MPa·m1/2. COHP revealed stronger M–C and M–Al bonding in Ta/Nb-centered environments than in Ti- and V-centered environments, explaining the flexural-strength grouping. However, fracture toughness required path-dependent basal-cleavage descriptors beyond the average bond strength. A validated DP-MD model demonstrated structural retention up to 1500 K under inert (oxygen-free) conditions and within the simulation time scale, intrinsic tensile softening, and composition-dependent cleavage-work retention. Qualitative-to-semiquantitative bridging projections indicate that (TaNbV)2AlC provides the highest absolute strength and toughness, whereas (TaTiNbV)2AlC has the best elevated-temperature retention. These results reveal that Ta/Nb-rich bonding and basal-cleavage resistance act as complementary, composition-dependent mechanisms governing the strength–toughness balance and its elevated-temperature retention in this Ta-based 211 MAX series, providing a mechanistic basis for designing entropy-engineered MAX ceramics with room-temperature performance and elevated-temperature property retention as distinct targets.

Graphical Abstract

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
JAC1368_ESM.pdf (2.9 MB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Advanced Ceramics
Article number: 9221368

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Liu L, Zhuang Q, Xiao X, et al. Strong-bond networks and basal-cleavage resistance govern strength–toughness balance and elevated-temperature retention in Ta-based medium-entropy 211 MAX ceramics. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2026, 15(10): 9221368. https://doi.org/10.26599/JAC.2026.9221368

443

Views

60

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 07 July 2026
Revised: 20 August 2026
Accepted: 28 August 2026
Published: 29 October 2026
© The Author(s) 2026.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).