AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (18.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Effect of Sc substitution on the phase composition, microstructure, and properties of (Tb1−xScx)3(Al1−yScy)2Al3O12 transparent ceramics

Lixuan Zhang1,2Chen Hu1,2( )Xiao Li1,3Zhenzhen Zhou1,2Tingsong Li1Yiyang Liu1Lexiang Wu1Jiang Li1,2( )
Transparent Ceramics Research Center, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201899, China
Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Ganjiang Innovation Academy, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ganzhou 341000, China
Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Terbium aluminum garnet (Tb3Al5O12; TAG) ceramics are among the most promising magneto–optical materials owing to their outstanding comprehensive performance. Many works have focused on improving the optical quality of TAG ceramics. A key point for improving optical quality is ensuring the accuracy of the stoichiometric ratio and avoiding secondary phases. In this work, 0, 2, 4, or 6 wt% Sc2O3 was added to the TAG ceramics to increase the solid solubility. The effects of Sc substitution on the crystal structure, sintering process, microstructure, optical transmittance, and magneto–optical properties of (Tb1−xScx)3(Al1−yScy)2Al3O12 (TSAG) ceramics are studied in detail. 4 wt% Sc2O3:TAG ceramics with an in-line transmittance of 82.2% at 1064 nm and 81.2% at 633 nm were successfully fabricated, and the Verdet constant was 164.4 rad·T−1·m−1 at 633 nm. Anti-site defects (ADs) and Sc replacement in TAG are further studied via first-principles calculations to determine the working mechanism of Sc. Both the experimental and calculation results show that the introduction of Sc can effectively increase the solid solubility of TAG ceramics, suppress secondary phases, and hence improve the optical transmittance.

References

[1]

Danson CN, Haefner C, Bromage J, et al. Petawatt and exawatt class lasers worldwide. High Power Laser Sci Eng 2019, 7: 54.

[2]

Clery D. Explosion marks laser fusion breakthrough. Science 2022, 378: 1154–1155.

[3]

Wills S. Gravitational waves: The road ahead. Opt Photonics News 2018, 29: 44.

[4]
Mironov EA, Snetkov IL, Starobor AV, et al. A perspective on Faraday isolators for advanced lasers. Appl phys Lett 2023, 122 : 100502.
[5]
Zhang LX, Hu DJ, Snetkov IL, et al., A review on magneto–optical ceramics for Faraday isolators, J Adv Ceram 2023, 12 : 873–915.
[6]

Snetkov I, Li J. Selection of magneto–optical material for a faraday isolator operating in high-power laser radiation. Magnetochemistry 2022, 8: 168.

[7]
Ikesue A, Aung YL, Wang J, Progress of magneto–optical ceramics. Prog Quantum Electron 2022, 86 : 100416.
[8]

Dou RQ, Zhang HT, Zhang QL, et al. Growth and properties of TSAG and TSLAG magneto–optical crystals with large size. Opt Mater 2019, 96: 109272.

[9]

Ikesue A, Aung YL. Magneto–optical performance of (LuTb)3Al5O12 single crystal by SSCG method. Opt Mater X 2022, 13: 100139.

[10]
Hao YK, Xin XH, Liu L, et al., Growth and characterization of Tb3Sc2Al3O12 magneto–optical crystal. Chin J Lumin 2022, 43 : 1070–1077.
[11]
Starobor AV, Snetkov IL, Yasuhara R, et al. Faraday isolators based on TSAG crystal for multikilowatt lasers. In: Proceedings of Lasers and Electro–Optics Europe & European Quantum Electronics Conference, IEEE, Munuchi, Germany, 2017.
[12]

Zheleznov D, Starobor A, Palashov O, et al. High-power Faraday isolators based on TAG ceramics. Opt Express 2014, 22: 2578.

[13]

Zheleznov D, Starobor A, Palashov O, et al. Improving characteristics of Faraday isolators based on TAG ceramics by cerium doping. Opt Lett 2014, 39: 2183–2186.

[14]

Hamamoto K, Nishio M, Tokita S, et al. Properties of TAG ceramics at room and cryogenic temperatures and performance estimations as a Faraday isolator. Opt Mater Express 2021, 11: 434.

[15]

Zhang LX, Starobor AV, Hu DJ, et al. Highly transparent Tb3Al5O12 ceramics for kilowatt-level Faraday isolator. J Am Ceram Soc 2024, 107: 3653–3658.

[16]

Zhang LX, Li XY, Hu DJ, et al. Fine-grained Tb3Al5O12 transparent ceramics prepared by co-precipitation synthesis and two-step sintering. Magnetochemistry 2023, 9: 47.

[17]
Zhang LX, Li XY, Hu DJ, et al., Magneto–optical, thermal, and mechanical properties of polycrystalline Tb3Al5O12 transparent ceramics, J Am Ceram Soc 2023, 106 : 5311–5321.
[18]
Li XY, Zhang LX, Hu DJ, et al., Fabrication and characterizations of Tb3Al5O12-based magneto–optical ceramics. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 2022, 20 : 1–7.
[19]

Chen J, Tang YR, Chen C, et al. Roles of zirconia-doping in the sintering process of high quality Tb3Al5O12 magneto–optic ceramics. Scripta Mater 2020, 176: 83–87.

[20]

Zhang SY, Liu P, Xu XD, et al. Effect of the MgO on microstructure and optical properties of TAG (Tb3Al5O12) transparent ceramics using hot isostatic pressing. Opt Mater 2018, 80: 7–11.

[21]

Dai JW, Pan YB, Xie TF, et al. Highly transparent Tb3Al5O12 magneto–optical ceramics sintered from co-precipitated powders with sintering aids. Opt Mater 2018, 78: 370–374.

[22]

Huang XY, Zuo L, Li XY, et al. Fabrication and characterization of Tb3Al5O12 magneto–optical ceramics by solid-state reactive sintering. Opt Mater 2020, 102: 109795.

[23]

Li XY, Liu Q, Liu X, et al. Sintering parameter optimization of Tb3Al5O12 magneto–optical ceramics by vacuum sintering and HIP post-treatment. J Am Ceram Soc 2021, 104: 2116–2124.

[24]

Ganschow S, Klimm D, Reiche P, et al. On the crystallization of terbium aluminium garnet. 3.0.CO;2-C">Cryst Res Technol 1999, 34: 615–619.

[25]

Zhang LX, Hu DJ, Li X, et al. Effect of Y substitution on the microstructure, magneto–optical, and thermal properties of (Tb1– x Y x )3Al5O12 transparent ceramics. J Adv Ceram 2024, 13: 529–538.

[26]

Wu YH, Sun ZC, Feng GQ, et al. Preparation and properties of novel Tb3Sc2Al3O12 (TSAG) magneto–optical transparent ceramic. J Eur Ceram Soc 2021, 41: 195–201.

[27]
Shi LJ, Guo LW, Wei QK, et al. Properties characterization of Tb3Sc2Al3O12(TSAG) crystals grown by edge-defined film-fed growth method. J Synth Cryst 2013, 42 : 1735–1740, 1756. (in Chinese)
[28]
Ikari M. UFB-containing liquid production device, and UFB-containing liquid production method. JP patent JP2019199386, 2019.
[29]
Ikari M, Matsumoto T, Tanaka K. Paramagnetic garnet-type transparent ceramic production method, paramagnetic garnet-type transparent ceramic, magnetic optical material, and magnetic optical device. JP patent WO 2022054593, 2022.
[30]
Kresse G, Hafner J. Ab initiomolecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys Rev B 1993, 47 : 558–561.
[31]

Blöchl PE. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 1994, 50: 17953–17979.

[32]

Kresse G, Joubert D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 1999, 59: 1758–1775.

[33]

Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 1996, 77: 3865–3868.

[34]

Monkhorst HJ, Pack JD. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys Rev B 1976, 13: 5188–5192.

[35]

Hammann J. Etude par diffraction de neutrons à 0, 31°K de la structure antiferromagnétique des grenats d’aluminium–terbium et d’aluminium–holmium. Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci 1969, 25: 1853–1856.

[36]

Lu B, Wu SF, Cheng HM, et al. Binary transparent (Ho1− x Dy x )2O3 ceramics: Compositional influences on particle properties, sintering kinetics and Faraday magneto-optical effects. J Eur Ceram Soc 2021, 41: 2826–2833.

[37]
Zhang X, Liang S. Study on the sintering kinetic of transparent alumina ceramic. J Synth Cryst 2018, 47 : 2555–2560. (in Chinese)
[38]

Young WS, Cutler IB. Initial sintering with constant rates of heating. J Am Ceram Soc 1970, 53: 659–663.

[39]

Johnson DL. New method of obtaining volume, grain–boundary, and surface diffusion coefficients from sintering data. J Appl Phys 1969, 40: 192–200.

[40]

Lai YQ, Lu B, Wang M. Optical properties and Faraday magneto–optical effects of highly transparent novel Tb2Zr2O7 fluorite ceramics. Scripta Mater 2023, 227: 115282.

[41]
Wanger CD, Riggs WM, Davis LE, et al. Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. Perkin-Elmer Co., USA, 1979.
[42]

Hu C, Liu SP, Shi Y, et al. Antisite defects in nonstoichiometric Lu3Al5O12:Ce ceramic scintillators. Phys Status Solidi B: 2015, 252: 1993–1999.

[43]
Liu B, Gu M, Liu XL, et al. Formation energies of antisite defects in Y3Al5O12: A first-principles study. Appl phys Lett 2009, 94 : 121910.
[44]
Van de Walle CG, Neugebauer J. First-principles calculations for defects and impurities: Applications to III-nitrides. Appl phys Lett 2004, 95 : 3851–3879.
[45]

Patel AP, Stanek CR, Grimes RW. Comparison of defect processes in REAlO3 perovskites and RE3Al5O12 garnets. Phys Status Solidi B: 2013, 250: 1624–1631.

[46]

Dai JW, Snetkov IL, Palashov OV, et al. Fabrication, microstructure and magneto–optical properties of Tb3Al5O12 transparent ceramics. Opt Mater 2016, 62: 205–210.

[47]

Zhang S, Northrup J. Chemical potential dependence of defect formation energies in GaAs: Application to Ga self-diffusion. Phys Rev Lett 1991, 67: 2339–2342.

[48]

Shimamura K, Kito T, Castel E, et al. Growth of {Tb3}[Sc2– x Lu x ](Al3)O12 single crystals for visible-infrared optical isolators. Cryst Growth Des 2010, 10: 3466–3470.

[49]

Petrosyan AG, Ovanesyan KL, Shirinyan GO, et al. Site occupation and solubility limit of Sc in Lu3Al5O12. J Cryst Growth 2012, 338: 143–146.

Journal of Advanced Ceramics
Pages 1442-1452
Cite this article:
Zhang L, Hu C, Li X, et al. Effect of Sc substitution on the phase composition, microstructure, and properties of (Tb1−xScx)3(Al1−yScy)2Al3O12 transparent ceramics. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2024, 13(9): 1442-1452. https://doi.org/10.26599/JAC.2024.9220948

1089

Views

168

Downloads

1

Crossref

1

Web of Science

1

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 31 May 2024
Revised: 13 July 2024
Accepted: 01 August 2024
Published: 18 September 2024
© The Author(s) 2024.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return