AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (11.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

An innovative and facile synthesis route of (La,Sr)2FeO4+δ–La0.4Sr0.6FeO3−δ composite as a highly stable air electrode for reversible solid oxide cell applications

Qihang Ren1,2,Yang Zhang2,Haoliang Tao2Ling Qin2Konrad Świerczek3Wanbing Guan2Jianxin Wang2Changrong Xia1Liangzhu Zhu2,4( )
Nano Science and Technology Institute, University of Science and Technology of China, Suzhou 215123, China
Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Advanced Fuel Cells and Electrolyzers Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China
Faculty of Energy and Fuels, AGH University of Krakow, al. A. Mickiewicza 30, Krakow 30-059, Poland
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, Shiyan 442002, China

Qihang Ren and Yang Zhang contributed equally to this work.

Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Achieving thermal cycle stability is an imperative challenge for the successful commercialization of solid oxide cell (SOC) technology. Ruddlesden‒Popper (R‒P) oxides, whose thermal expansion coefficient (TEC) is compatible with common electrolytes, are promising candidates for SOC applications. However, the two-dimensional conduction characteristic of R‒P oxides leads to insufficient catalytic activity, which hinders their performance. Here, we propose a win‒win strategy for self-assembly decoration by employing a one-pot method to address this issue. By using a single perovskite oxide (La0.4Sr0.6FeO3) to modify R‒P oxide (La0.8Sr1.2FeO4+δ), we enhanced the electrochemical performance without compromising the stability of the composite electrode. The strategic incorporation of a 10 mol% perovskite phase at 800 °C resulted in a significant 49% reduction in the polarization resistance (Rp), an impressive 86% increase in the maximum power density under power generation mode, and a notable 33% increase in the electrolysis current density under electrolysis mode. Furthermore, the perovskite-decorated R‒P oxide composite also exhibited high thermal and chemical stability, with negligible performance degradation observed under both thermal cycling and charge/discharge cycling conditions. Our results demonstrate that such dual-phase composites, which are simultaneously produced by a one-step process with outstanding catalytic activity and stability, can be considered an effective strategy for the advancement of SOCs.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
JAC0938_ESM.pdf (1.6 MB)

References

[1]

Qiu P, Li C, Liu B, et al. Materials of solid oxide electrolysis cells for H2O and CO2 electrolysis: A review. J Adv Ceram 2023, 12: 1463–1510.

[2]

Zhang Y, Knibbe R, Sunarso J, et al. Recent progress on advanced materials for solid-oxide fuel cells operating below 500 °C. Adv Mater 2017, 29: 1700132.

[3]

Holtappels P, Mehling H, Roehlich S, et al. SOFC system operating strategies for mobile applications. Fuel Cells 2005, 5: 499–508.

[4]

Milcarek RJ, Garrett MJ, Welles TS, et al. Performance investigation of a micro-tubular flame-assisted fuel cell stack with 3,000 rapid thermal cycles. J Power Sources 2018, 394: 86–93.

[5]

Shin J S, Saqib M, Jo M, et al. Degradation mechanisms of solid oxide fuel cells under various thermal cycling conditions. ACS Appl Mater Inter 2021, 13: 49868–49878.

[6]

Singh M, Paydar S, Singh AK, et al. Recent advancement of solid oxide fuel cells towards semiconductor membrane fuel cells. Energy Mater 2024, 4: 400012.

[7]

Vibhu V, Yildiz S, Vinke IC, et al. High performance LSC infiltrated LSCF oxygen electrode for high temperature steam electrolysis application. J Electrochem Soc 2019, 166: F102–F108.

[8]

Tietz F. Thermal expansion of SOFC materials. Ionics 1999, 5: 129–139.

[9]

Pelosato R, Cordaro G, Stucchi D, et al. Cobalt based layered perovskites as cathode material for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells: A brief review. J Power Sources 2015, 298: 46–67.

[10]

Wang N, Huang ZY, Tang CM, et al. Functional layer engineering to improve performance of protonic ceramic fuel cells. Rare Metals 2023, 42: 2250–2260.

[11]

Jiang SP. Development of lanthanum strontium cobalt ferrite perovskite electrodes of solid oxide fuel cells—A review. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2019, 44: 7448–7493.

[12]

Liu W, Zheng JH, Wang YD, et al. Structure evaluation of anode-supported planar solid oxide fuel cells based on single/double-sided electrolyte(s) under redox conditions. Int J Appl Ceram Tec 2020, 17: 1314–1321.

[13]

Nirala G, Yadav D, Upadhyay S. Ruddlesden–Popper phase A2BO4 oxides: Recent studies on structure, electrical, dielectric, and optical properties. J Adv Ceram 2020, 9: 129–148.

[14]

Park S, Kim Y, Noh Y, et al. A sulfur-tolerant cathode catalyst fabricated with in situ exsolved CoNi alloy nanoparticles anchored on a Ruddlesden–Popper support for CO2 electrolysis. J Mater Chem A 2020, 8: 138–148.

[15]
Xu XM, Pan YL, Zhong YJ, et al. Ruddlesden–Popper perovskites in electrocatalysis. Mater Horiz 2020, 7 : 2519–2565.
[16]

Feng YS, Shen Y, Wang F, et al. Robust tantalum tuned perovskite oxygen electrode for reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. Rare Metals 2024, 43: 3055–3065.

[17]

Kim H-S, Yoo HI. Compilation of all the isothermal mass/charge transport properties of the mixed conducting La2NiO4+ δ at elevated temperatures. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2011, 13: 4651–4658.

[18]

Nakamura T, Yashiro K, Sato K, et al. Thermally-induced and chemically-induced structural changes in layered perovskite-type oxides Nd2− x Sr x NiO4+ δ ( x =0, 0.2, 0.4). Solid State Ionics 2010, 181: 402–411.

[19]

Li ZF, Yang B, Qian B, et al. Evaluation of Fe-doped Pr1.8Ba0.2NiO4 as a high-performance air electrode for reversible solid oxide cell. Sep Purif Technol 2023, 308: 123002.

[20]

Ding PP, Li WL, Zhao HW, et al. Review on Ruddlesden–Popper perovskites as cathode for solid oxide fuel cells. J Phys Mater 2021, 4: 022002.

[21]

Kharton VV, Kovalevsky AV, Avdeev M, et al. Chemically induced expansion of La2NiO4+ δ -based materials. Chem Mater 2007, 19: 2027–2033.

[22]

Chen JY, Vashook V, Trots DM, et al. Chemical diffusion and oxygen exchange of LaNi0.4Fe0.6O3− δ ceramics. J Adv Ceram 2014, 3: 240–249.

[23]

Parfitt D, Chroneos A, Kilner JA, et al. Molecular dynamics study of oxygen diffusion in Pr2NiO4+ δ . Phys Chem Chem Phys 2010, 12: 6834–6836.

[24]

Xie MY, Cai CK, Duan XY, et al. Review on Fe-based double perovskite cathode materials for solid oxide fuel cells. Energy Mater 2024, 4: 400007.

[25]

Sharma RK, Cheah SK, Burriel M, et al. Design of La2– x Pr x NiO4+ δ SOFC cathodes: A compromise between electrochemical performance and thermodynamic stability. J Mater Chem A 2017, 5: 1120–1132.

[26]

Shirani-Faradonbeh H, Paydar MH, Paydar S, et al. Synthesis and electrochemical studies of novel cobalt free (Nd0.9La0.1)1.6Sr0.4Ni0.75Cu0.25O3.8 (NLSNC4) cathode material for IT-SOFCs. Fuel Cells 2019, 19: 578–586.

[27]

Liu YH, Deng GB, Chen P, et al. A high performance La2NiO4+ δ impregnated PrBaCo2O5+ δ cathode for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Solid State Ionics 2023, 403: 116387.

[28]

Han S, Lei YQ, Xu Q, et al. Beneficial effect of oxygen-ion conductor infiltration on the electrocatalytic properties of a heavily strontium-doped lanthanum nickelate Ruddlesden–Popper SOFC cathode. Ionics 2024, 30: 2177–2189.

[29]

Sang JK, Zhang Y, Yang J, et al. Enhancing coking tolerance of flat-tube solid oxide fuel cells for direct power generation with nearly-dry methanol. J Power Sources 2023, 556: 232485.

[30]

Zhang PP, Yang YR, Yang ZB, et al. Direct power generation from methanol by solid oxide fuel cells with a Cu-ceria based catalyst layer. Renew Energ 2022, 194: 439–447.

[31]

Das S, Sukumaran S, Pratihar SK. Optical, magnetic, and electrochemical properties of a fluorite-perovskite Ce0.9Gd0.1O2− −La0.6Sr0.4FeO3− nanocomposite synthesized by one pot sol–gel auto-combustion route. Ceram Int 2024, 50: 3397–3408.

[32]

Zhao ZY, Zou MD, Huang H, et al. Stable perovskite-fluorite dual-phase composites synthesized by one-pot solid-state reactive sintering for protonic ceramic fuel cells. Ceram Int 2021, 47: 32856–32866.

[33]
Hu T, He F, Liu ML, et al. In situ/operando regulation of the reaction activities on hetero-structured electrodes for solid oxide cells. Prog Mater Sci 2023, 133 : 101050.
[34]

Yang R, Lin WB, He YJ, et al. Revealing the detrimental CO2 reduction effect of La0.6Sr0.4FeO3− δ -derived heterostructure in solid oxide electrolysis cells. iScience 2024, 27: 109648.

[35]

Zhang Y, Shen LY, Wang YH, et al. Enhanced oxygen reduction kinetics of IT-SOFC cathode with PrBaCo2O5+ δ /Gd0.1Ce1.9O2− δ coherent interface. J Mater Chem A 2022, 10: 3495–3505.

[36]

Wan TH, Saccoccio M, Chen C, et al. Influence of the discretization methods on the distribution of relaxation times deconvolution: Implementing radial basis functions with DRTtools. Electrochim Acta 2015, 184: 483–499.

[37]

Effat MB, Ciucci F. Bayesian and hierarchical Bayesian based regularization for deconvolving the distribution of relaxation times from electrochemical impedance spectroscopy data. Electrochim Acta 2017, 247: 1117–1129.

[38]

Hong WT, Risch M, Stoerzinger KA, et al. Toward the rational design of non-precious transition metal oxides for oxygen electrocatalysis. Energy Environ Sci 2015, 8: 1404–1427.

[39]

Lee YL, Kleis J, Rossmeisl J, et al. Prediction of solid oxide fuel cell cathode activity with first-principles descriptors. Energy Environ Sci 2011, 4: 3966–3970.

[40]

Li HD, Li WJ, Wang FZ, et al. Fabrication of two lanthanides co-doped Bi2MoO6 photocatalyst: Selection, design and mechanism of Ln1/Ln2 redox couple for enhancing photocatalytic activity. Appl Catal B-Environ 2017, 217: 378–387.

[41]
Mikami K, Terada M, Matsuzawa H. “Asymmetric” catalysis by lanthanide complexes. Angew Chem Int Edit 2002, 41 : 3554–3572.
[42]

Rushton MJD, Chroneos A, Skinner SJ, et al. Effect of strain on the oxygen diffusion in yttria and gadolinia co-doped ceria. Solid State Ionics 2013, 230: 37–42.

[43]

Dawson JA, Tanaka I. Proton trapping in Y and Sn co-doped BaZrO3. J Mater Chem A 2015, 3: 10045–10051.

[44]

Zheng Y, Li YF, Wu T, et al. Oxygen reduction kinetic enhancements of intermediate-temperature SOFC cathodes with novel Nd0.5Sr0.5CoO3− δ /Nd0.8Sr1.2CoO δ heterointerfaces. Nano Energy 2018, 51: 711–720.

[45]

Gao PP, Bolon A, Taneja M, et al. Thermal expansion and elastic moduli of electrolyte materials for high and intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cell. Solid State Ionics 2017, 300: 1–9.

[46]

Yasuda I, Hikita T. Precise determination of the chemical diffusion coefficient of calcium-doped lanthanum chromites by means of electrical conductivity relaxation. J Electrochem Soc 1994, 141: 1268–1273.

[47]

Kim JD, Kim GD, Moon JW. Characterization of LSM–YSZ composite electrode by ac impedance spectroscopy. Solid State Ionics 2001, 143: 379–389.

[48]

Li M, Ren YY, Zhu ZS, et al. La0.4Bi0.4Sr0.2FeO3− δ as cobalt-free cathode for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cell. Electrochim Acta 2016, 191: 651–660.

[49]

Escudero MJ, Aguadero A, Alonso JA, et al. A kinetic study of oxygen reduction reaction on La2NiO4 cathodes by means of impedance spectroscopy. J Electroanal Chem 2007, 611: 107–116.

[50]

Saccoccio M, Wan TH, Chen C, et al. Optimal regularization in distribution of relaxation times applied to electrochemical impedance spectroscopy: Ridge and lasso regression methods—A theoretical and experimental study. Electrochim Acta 2014, 147: 470–482.

[51]

Xia J, Wang C, Wang XF, et al. A perspective on DRT applications for the analysis of solid oxide cell electrodes. Electrochim Acta 2020, 349: 136328.

[52]

Bastidas DM, Tao SW, Irvine JTS. A symmetrical solid oxide fuel cell demonstrating redox stable perovskite electrodes. J Mater Chem 2006, 16: 1603–1605.

Journal of Advanced Ceramics
Pages 1337-1348
Cite this article:
Ren Q, Zhang Y, Tao H, et al. An innovative and facile synthesis route of (La,Sr)2FeO4+δ–La0.4Sr0.6FeO3−δ composite as a highly stable air electrode for reversible solid oxide cell applications. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2024, 13(9): 1337-1348. https://doi.org/10.26599/JAC.2024.9220938

1453

Views

176

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 16 April 2024
Revised: 11 June 2024
Accepted: 01 July 2024
Published: 29 September 2024
© The Author(s) 2024.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return