References(66)
[1]
Yuliati L, Yoshida H. Photocatalytic conversion of methane. Chem Soc Rev 2008, 37: 1592–1602.
[2]
Chong ZR, Yang SHB, Babu P, et al. Review of natural gas hydrates as an energy resource: Prospects and challenges. Appl Energ 2016, 162: 1633–1652.
[3]
Murcia-López S, Villa K, Andreu T, et al. Partial oxidation of methane to methanol using bismuth-based photocatalysts. ACS Catal 2014, 4: 3013–3019.
[4]
Kunitski M, Eicke N, Huber P, et al. Double-slit photoelectron interference in strong-field ionization of the neon dimer. Nat Commun 2019, 10: 1.
[5]
Brandt AR, Heath GA, Kort EA, et al. Methane leaks from North American natural gas systems. Science 2014, 343: 733–735.
[6]
Chen XX, Li YP, Pan XY, et al. Photocatalytic oxidation of methane over silver decorated zinc oxide nanocatalysts. Nat Commun 2016, 7: 12273.
[7]
Lashof DA, Ahuja DR. Relative contributions of greenhouse gas emissions to global warming. Nature 1990, 344: 529–531.
[8]
Alvarez RA, Pacala SW, Winebrake JJ, et al. Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure. PNAS 2012, 109: 6435–6440.
[9]
Sushkevich VL, Palagin D, Ranocchiari M, et al. Selective anaerobic oxidation of methane enables direct synthesis of methanol. Science 2017, 356: 523–527.
[10]
Galadima A, Muraza O. Revisiting the oxidative coupling of methane to ethylene in the golden period of shale gas: A review. J Ind Eng Chem 2016, 37: 1–13.
[11]
Oh SC, Schulman E, Zhang JY, et al. Direct non-oxidative methane conversion in a millisecond catalytic wall reactor. Angew Chem Int Ed 2019, 58: 7083–7086.
[12]
Iulianelli A, Liguori S, Wilcox J, et al. Advances on methane steam reforming to produce hydrogen through membrane reactors technology: A review. Catal Rev 2016, 58: 1–35.
[13]
Soulivong D, Norsic S, Taoufik M, et al. Non-oxidative coupling reaction of methane to ethane and hydrogen catalyzed by the silica-supported tantalum hydride: (≡SiO)2Ta−H. J Am Chem Soc 2008, 130: 5044–5045.
[14]
Shimura K, Yoshida H. Semiconductor photocatalysts for non-oxidative coupling, dry reforming and steam reforming of methane. Catal Surv Asia 2014, 18: 24–33.
[15]
Zhu SS, Wang DW. Photocatalysis: Basic principles, diverse forms of implementations and emerging scientific opportunities. Adv Energy Mater 2017, 7: 1700841.
[16]
Shoji S, Peng XB, Yamaguchi A, et al. Photocatalytic uphill conversion of natural gas beyond the limitation of thermal reaction systems. Nat Catal 2020, 3: 148–153.
[17]
Zhang N, Quan Q, Qi MY, et al. Hierarchically tailorable double-array film hybrids with enhanced photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical performances. Appl Catal B-Environ 2019, 259: 118086.
[18]
Liu B, Chen B, Zhang BY, et al. Photocatalytic ozonation of offshore produced water by TiO2 nanotube arrays coupled with UV-LED irradiation. J Hazard Mater 2021, 402: 123456.
[19]
Kisslinger R, Askar AM, Thakur UK, et al. Preferentially oriented TiO2 nanotube arrays on non-native substrates and their improved performance as electron transporting layer in halide perovskite solar cells. Nanotechnology 2019, 30: 204003.
[20]
Guo L, Yang Z, Marcus K, et al. MoS2/TiO2 heterostructures as nonmetal plasmonic photocatalysts for highly efficient hydrogen evolution. Energ Environ Sci 2018, 11: 106–114.
[21]
Seong WM, Kim DH, Park IJ, et al. Roughness of Ti substrates for control of the preferred orientation of TiO2 nanotube arrays as a new orientation factor. J Phys Chem C 2015, 119: 13297–13305.
[22]
Chen XB, Liu L, Yu PY, et al. Increasing solar absorption for photocatalysis with black hydrogenated titanium dioxide nanocrystals. Science 2011, 331: 746–750.
[23]
Gao JQ, Xue JB, Jia SF, et al. Self-doping surface oxygen vacancy-induced lattice strains for enhancing visible light-driven photocatalytic H2 evolution over black TiO2. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2021, 13: 18758–18771.
[24]
Wang Z, Yang CY, Lin TQ, et al. Visible-light photocatalytic, solar thermal and photoelectrochemical properties of aluminium-reduced black titania. Energ Environ Sci 2013, 6: 3007–3014.
[25]
Hou XL, Aitola K, Jiang H, et al. Reduced TiO2 nanotube array as an excellent cathode for hydrogen evolution reaction in alkaline solution. Catal Today 2022, 402: 3–9.
[26]
Siuzdak K, Szkoda M, Lisowska-Oleksiak A, et al. Highly stable organic–inorganic junction composed of hydrogenated titania nanotubes infiltrated by a conducting polymer. RSC Adv 2016, 6: 33101–33110.
[27]
Zheng LX, Han SC, Liu H, et al. Hierarchical MoS2 nanosheet@TiO2 nanotube array composites with enhanced photocatalytic and photocurrent performances. Small 2016, 12: 1527–1536.
[28]
Wang SQ, Zhang ZL, Huo WY, et al. Preferentially oriented Ag–TiO2 nanotube array film: An efficient visible-light-driven photocatalyst. J Hazard Mater 2020, 399: 123016.
[29]
Lee S, Park IJ, Kim DH, et al. Crystallographically preferred oriented TiO2 nanotube arrays for efficient photovoltaic energy conversion. Energ Environ Sci 2012, 5: 7989–7995.
[30]
Pan DY, Huang H, Wang XY, et al. C-axis preferentially oriented and fully activated TiO2 nanotube arrays for lithium ion batteries and supercapacitors. J Mater Chem A 2014, 2: 11454–11464.
[31]
John K A, Naduvath J, Mallick S, et al. A novel cost effective fabrication technique for highly preferential oriented TiO2 nanotubes. Nanoscale 2015, 7: 20386–20390.
[32]
Ni JF, Fu SD, Wu C, et al. Self-supported nanotube arrays of sulfur-doped TiO2 enabling ultrastable and robust sodium storage. Adv Mater 2016, 28: 2259–2265.
[33]
Sadeghzadeh-Attar A. Photocatalytic degradation evaluation of N–Fe codoped aligned TiO2 nanorods based on the effect of annealing temperature. J Adv Ceram 2020, 9:107–122.
[34]
Cheah SK, Perre E, Rooth M, et al. Self-supported three-dimensional nanoelectrodes for microbattery applications. Nano Lett 2009, 9: 3230–3233.
[35]
Khan MM, Ansari SA, Pradhan D, et al. Band gap engineered TiO2 nanoparticles for visible light induced photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic studies. J Mater Chem A 2014, 2: 637–644.
[36]
Zhang W, Xue JB, Shen QQ, et al. Black single-crystal TiO2 nanosheet array films with oxygen vacancy on {001} facets for boosting photocatalytic CO2 reduction. J Alloy Compd 2021, 870: 159400.
[37]
Yang XH, Li Z, Sun CH, et al. Hydrothermal stability of {001} faceted anatase TiO2. Chem Mater 2011, 23: 3486–3494.
[38]
Wen CZ, Jiang HB, Qiao SZ, et al. Synthesis of high-reactive facets dominated anatase TiO2. J Mater Chem 2011, 21: 7052–7061.
[39]
Ong WJ, Tan LL, Chai SP, et al. Highly reactive {001} facets of TiO2-based composites: synthesis, formation mechanism and characterization. Nanoscale 2014, 6: 1946–2008.
[40]
Weon S, Choi E, Kim H, et al. Active {001} facet exposed TiO2 nanotubes photocatalyst filter for volatile organic compounds removal: From material development to commercial indoor air cleaner application. Environ Sci Technol 2018, 52: 9330–9340.
[41]
Yang HG, Sun CH, Qiao SZ, et al. Anatase TiO2 single crystals with a large percentage of reactive facets. Nature 2008, 453: 638–641.
[42]
Acevedo-Peña P, González F, González G, et al. The effect of anatase crystal orientation on the photoelectrochemical performance of anodic TiO2 nanotubes. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2014, 16: 26213–26220.
[43]
Cui HL, Zhao W, Yang CY, et al. Black TiO2 nanotube arrays for high-efficiency photoelectrochemical water-splitting. J Mater Chem A 2014, 2: 8612–8616.
[44]
Zhang Z, Tan X, Yu T, et al. Time-dependent formation of oxygen vacancies in black TiO2 nanotube arrays and the effect on photoelectrocatalytic and photoelectrochemical properties. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2016, 41: 11634–11643.
[45]
Wang X, Xia R, Muhire E, et al. Highly enhanced photocatalytic performance of TiO2 nanosheets through constructing TiO2/TiO2 quantum dots homojunction. Appl Surf Sci 2018, 459: 9–15.
[46]
Sanjinés R, Tang H, Berger H, et al. Electronic structure of anatase TiO2 oxide. J Appl Phys 1994, 75: 2945–2951.
[47]
Dementjev AP, Ivanova OP, Vasilyev LA, et al. Altered layer as sensitive initial chemical state indicator. J Vac Sci Technol A 1994, 12: 423–427.
[48]
Gao JQ, Shen QQ, Guan RF, et al. Oxygen vacancy self-doped black TiO2 nanotube arrays by aluminothermic reduction for photocatalytic CO2 reduction under visible light illumination. J CO2 Util 2020, 35: 205–215.
[49]
Yang Y, Kao LC, Liu YY, et al. Cobalt-doped black TiO2 nanotube array as a stable anode for oxygen evolution and electrochemical wastewater treatment. ACS Catal 2018, 8: 4278–4287.
[50]
Lu GQ, Linsebigler A, Yates JT. The adsorption and photodesorption of oxygen on the TiO2(110) surface. J Chem Phys 1995, 102: 4657–4662.
[51]
Wang WW, Li XB, Deng F, et al. Novel organic/inorganic PDI–urea/BiOBr S-scheme heterojunction for improved photocatalytic antibiotic degradation and H2O2 production. Chinese Chem Lett 2022, 33: 5200–5207.
[52]
Hu Y, Li XB, Wang WW, et al. Bi and S co-doping g-C3N4 to enhance internal electric field for robust photocatalytic degradation and H2 production. Chin J Struct Chem 2022, 41: 2206069–2206078.
[53]
Li XB, Kang BB, Dong F, et al. BiOBr with oxygen vacancies capture 0D black phosphorus quantum dots for high efficient photocatalytic ofloxacin degradation. Appl Surf Sci 2022, 593: 153422.
[54]
Singh SP, Anzai A, Kawaharasaki S, et al. Non-oxidative coupling of methane over Pd-loaded gallium oxide photocatalysts in a flow reactor. Catal Today 2021, 375: 264–272.
[55]
Yuliati L, Hattori T, Itoh H, et al. Photocatalytic nonoxidative coupling of methane on gallium oxide and silica-supported gallium oxide. J Catal 2008, 257: 396–402.
[56]
Gao JQ, Xue JB, Shen QQ, et al. A promoted photocatalysis system trade-off between thermodynamic and kinetic via hierarchical distribution dual-defects for efficient H2 evolution. Chem Eng J 2022, 431: 133281.
[57]
Li GS, Lian ZC, Li X, et al. Ionothermal synthesis of black Ti3+-doped single-crystal TiO2 as an active photocatalyst for pollutant degradation and H2 generation. J Mater Chem A 2015, 3: 3748–3756.
[58]
Hu YH. A highly efficient photocatalyst-hydrogenated black TiO2 for the photocatalytic splitting of water. Angew Chem Int Ed 2012, 51: 12410–12412.
[59]
Mani AD, Li J, Wang ZQ, et al. Coupling of piezocatalysis and photocatalysis for efficient degradation of methylene blue by Bi0.9Gd0.07La0.03FeO3 nanotubes. J Adv Ceram 2022, 11: 1069–1081.
[60]
Li HM, Shen QQ, Zhang H, et al. Oxygen vacancy-mediated WO3 phase junction to steering photogenerated charge separation for enhanced water splitting. J Adv Ceram 2022, 11: 1873–1888.
[61]
Lyu JZ, Wang Y, Gao JX, et al. Construction of homojunction-adsorption layer on anatase TiO2 to improve photocatalytic mineralization of volatile organic compounds. Appl Catal B-Environ 2017, 202: 664–670.
[62]
Lyu JZ, Shao JW, Wang YH, et al. Construction of a porous core–shell homojunction for the photocatalytic degradation of antibiotics. Chem Eng J 2019, 358: 614–620.
[63]
Sun JJ, Li XY, Zhao QD, et al. Ultrathin nanoflake-assembled hierarchical BiOBr microflower with highly exposed {001} facets for efficient photocatalytic degradation of gaseous ortho-dichlorobenzene. Appl Catal B-Environ 2021, 281: 119478.
[64]
Jia YF, Li SP, Gao JZ, et al. Highly efficient (BiO)2CO3–BiO2−x–graphene photocatalysts: Z-scheme photocatalytic mechanism for their enhanced photocatalytic removal of NO. Appl Catal B-Environ 2019, 240: 241–252.
[65]
Xue JB, Jiang S, Lei CK, et al. Construction of multi-homojunction TiO2 nanotubes for boosting photocatalytic hydrogen evolution by steering photogenerated charge transfer. Nano Res 2023, 16: 2259–2270.
[66]
Zhou H, Zhang YR. Electrochemically self-doped TiO2 nanotube arrays for supercapacitors. J Phys Chem C 2014, 118: 5626–5636.