Attempted preparation of La0.5Ba0.5MnO3−δ leading to an in-situ formation of manganate nanocomposites as a cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells

Rui Zhou; Yanru Yin; Hailu Dai; Xuan Yang; Yueyuan Gu; Lei Bi

doi:10.26599/JAC.2023.9220748

Journal of Advanced Ceramics 2023, 12(6): 1189-1200 https://doi.org/10.26599/JAC.2023.9220748

Research Article |

Open Access | Issue | Published: 19 May 2023

Attempted preparation of La_0.5Ba_0.5MnO_3−δ leading to an in-situ formation of manganate nanocomposites as a cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells

Show Author's Information Hide Author's Information Rui Zhou^{^a^,^†}, Yanru Yin^{^a^,^†}, Hailu Dai^{^b}, Xuan Yang^{^a}, Yueyuan Gu^{^a}(

), Lei Bi^{^a}(

)

aSchool of Resources Environment and Safety Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China

bSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng 224051, China

† Rui Zhou and Yanru Yin contributed equally to this work.

Keywords:

nanocomposites, cathode, solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs), proton conductor, La_0.5Ba_0.5MnO_3−δ

Cite this article:

Zhou R, Yin Y, Dai H, et al. Attempted preparation of La_0.5Ba_0.5MnO_3−δ leading to an in-situ formation of manganate nanocomposites as a cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2023, 12(6): 1189-1200. https://doi.org/10.26599/JAC.2023.9220748

Download citation

EndNote(RIS)

BibTeX

1899

Views

381

Downloads

Citations

Crossref

WoS

Scopus

CSCD

Abstract Full text About this article

Abstract

A La_0.5Ba_0.5MnO_3−δ oxide was prepared using the sol–gel technique. Instead of a pure phase, La_0.5Ba_0.5MnO_3−δ was discovered to be a combination of La_0.7Ba_0.3MnO_3−δ and BaMnO₃. The in-situ production of La_0.7Ba_0.3MnO_3−δ+BaMnO₃ nanocomposites enhanced the oxygen vacancy (V_O) formation compared to single-phase La_0.7Ba_0.3MnO_3−δ or BaMnO₃, providing potential benefits as a cathode for fuel cells. Subsequently, La_0.7Ba_0.3MnO_3−δ+BaMnO₃ nanocomposites were utilized as the cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells (H-SOFCs), which significantly improved cell performance. At 700 ℃, H-SOFC with a La_0.7Ba_0.3MnO_3−δ+BaMnO₃ nanocomposite cathode achieved the highest power density (1504 mW·cm⁻²) yet recorded for H-SOFCs with manganate cathodes. This performance was much greater than that of single-phase La_0.7Ba_0.3MnO_3−δ or BaMnO₃ cathode cells. In addition, the cell demonstrated excellent working stability. First-principles calculations indicated that the La_0.7Ba_0.3MnO_3−δ/BaMnO₃ interface was crucial for the enhanced cathode performance. The oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) free energy barrier was significantly lower at the La_0.7Ba_0.3MnO_3−δ/BaMnO₃ interface than that at the La_0.7Ba_0.3MnO_3−δ or BaMnO₃ surfaces, which explained the origin of high performance and gave a guide for the construction of novel cathodes for H-SOFCs.

Full text

Abstract

Full text

Outline

About this article

Attempted preparation of La_0.5Ba_0.5MnO_3−δ leading to an in-situ formation of manganate nanocomposites as a cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells

Show Author's information Hide Author's Information Rui Zhou^{^a^,^†}, Yanru Yin^{^a^,^†}, Hailu Dai^{^b}, Xuan Yang^{^a}, Yueyuan Gu^{^a}(

), Lei Bi^{^a}(

)

aSchool of Resources Environment and Safety Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China

bSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng 224051, China

† Rui Zhou and Yanru Yin contributed equally to this work.

Abstract

Keywords: nanocomposites, cathode, solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs), proton conductor, La_0.5Ba_0.5MnO_3−δ

References(58)

[1]

Mei J, Liao T, Liang J, et al. Toward promising cathode catalysts for nonlithium metal–oxygen batteries. Adv Energy Mater 2020, 10: 1901997.

DOI Google Scholar

[2]

Zhang YW, Mei J, Yan C, et al. Bioinspired 2D nanomaterials for sustainable applications. Adv Mater 2020, 32: 1902806.

DOI Google Scholar

[3]

Xiang HM, Xing Y, Dai FZ, et al. High-entropy ceramics: Present status, challenges, and a look forward. J Adv Ceram 2021, 10: 385–441.

DOI Google Scholar

[4]

Zhang Y, Knibbe R, Sunarso J, et al. Recent progress on advanced materials for solid-oxide fuel cells operating below 500 ℃. Adv Mater 2017, 29: 1700132.

DOI Google Scholar

[5]

Zhang Y, Chen B, Guan DQ, et al. Thermal-expansion offset for high-performance fuel cell cathodes. Nature 2021, 591: 246–251.

DOI Google Scholar

[6]

Zvonareva I, Fu XZ, Medvedev D, et al. Electrochemistry and energy conversion features of protonic ceramic cells with mixed ionic–electronic electrolytes. Energ Environ Sci 2021, 15: 439–465.

DOI Google Scholar

[7]

Duan CC, Huang J, Sullivan N, et al. Proton-conducting oxides for energy conversion and storage. Appl Phys Rev 2020, 7: 011314.

DOI Google Scholar

[8]

Wang Z, Wang YH, Wang J, et al. Rational design of perovskite ferrites as high-performance proton-conducting fuel cell cathodes. Nat Catal 2022, 5: 777–787.

DOI Google Scholar

[9]

Chen M, Xie XB, Guo JH, et al. Space charge layer effect at the platinum anode/BaZr_0.9Y_0.1O_3−δ electrolyte interface in proton ceramic fuel cells. J Mater Chem A 2020, 8: 12566–12575.

DOI Google Scholar

[10]

Cao D, Zhou MY, Yan XM, et al. High performance low-temperature tubular protonic ceramic fuel cells based on barium cerate–zirconate electrolyte. Electrochem Commun 2021, 125: 106986.

DOI Google Scholar

[11]

Xu YS, Gu YY, Bi L. A highly-active Zn_0.58Co_2.42O₄ spinel oxide as a promising cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Mater Chem A 2022, 10: 25437–25445.

DOI Google Scholar

[12]

Chen M, Zhao K, Zhao JS, et al. Accelerated kinetics of hydrogen oxidation reaction on the Ni anode coupled with BaZr_0.9Y_0.1O_3−δ proton-conducting ceramic electrolyte via tuning the electrolyte surface chemistry. Appl Surf Sci 2022, 605: 154800.

DOI Google Scholar

[13]

Medvedev DA, Lyagaeva JG, Gorbova EV, et al. Advanced materials for SOFC application: Strategies for the development of highly conductive and stable solid oxide proton electrolytes. Prog Mater Sci 2016, 75: 38–79.

DOI Google Scholar

[14]

Zvonareva IA, Mineev AM, Tarasova NA, et al. High-temperature transport properties of BaSn_1−xSc_xO_3−δ ceramic materials as promising electrolytes for protonic ceramic fuel cells. J Adv Ceram 2022, 11: 1131–1143.

DOI Google Scholar

[15]

Zhang W, Hu YH. Progress in proton-conducting oxides as electrolytes for low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells: From materials to devices. Energy Sci Eng 2021, 9: 984–1011.

DOI Google Scholar

[16]

Chen M, Chen DC, Wang K, et al. Densification and electrical conducting behavior of BaZr_0.9Y_0.1O_3−δ proton conducting ceramics with NiO additive. J Alloys Compd 2019, 781: 857–865.

DOI Google Scholar

[17]

Li XY, Chen ZM, Yang Y, et al. Highly stable and efficient Pt single-atom catalyst for reversible proton-conducting solid oxide cells. Appl Catal B-Environ 2022, 316: 121627.

DOI Google Scholar

[18]

Tarutin AP, Lyagaeva JG, Medvedev DA, et al. Recent advances in layered Ln₂NiO_4+δ nickelates: Fundamentals and prospects of their applications in protonic ceramic fuel and electrolysis cells. J Mater Chem A 2021, 9: 154–195.

DOI Google Scholar

[19]

Ling YH, Guo TM, Guo YY, et al. New two-layer Ruddlesden–Popper cathode materials for protonic ceramics fuel cells. J Adv Ceram 2021, 10: 1052–1060.

DOI Google Scholar

[20]

Xu YS, Xu X, Bi L. A high-entropy spinel ceramic oxide as the cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Adv Ceram 2022, 11: 794–804.

DOI Google Scholar

[21]

Liang MZ, He F, Zhou C, et al. Nickel-doped BaCo_0.4Fe_0.4Zr_0.1Y_0.1O_3−δ as a new high-performance cathode for both oxygen-ion and proton conducting fuel cells. Chem Eng J 2021, 420: 127717.

DOI Google Scholar

[22]

Ren RZ, Wang ZH, Meng XG, et al. Tailoring the oxygen vacancy to achieve fast intrinsic proton transport in a perovskite cathode for protonic ceramic fuel cells. ACS Appl Energy Mater 2020, 3: 4914–4922.

DOI Google Scholar

[23]

Zhou C, Sunarso J, Song YF, et al. New reduced-temperature ceramic fuel cells with dual-ion conducting electrolyte and triple-conducting double perovskite cathode. J Mater Chem A 2019, 7: 13265–13274.

DOI Google Scholar

[24]

Ma ZL, Ye QR, Zhang BK, et al. A highly efficient and robust bifunctional perovskite-type air electrode with triple-conducting behavior for low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Adv Funct Mater 2022, 32: 2209054.

DOI Google Scholar

[25]

Zou D, Yi YN, Song YF, et al. The BaCe_0.16Y_0.04Fe_0.8O_3−δ nanocomposite: A new high-performance cobalt-free triple-conducting cathode for protonic ceramic fuel cells operating at reduced temperatures. J Mater Chem A 2022, 10: 5381–5390.

DOI Google Scholar

[26]

Graves C, Ebbesen SD, Jensen SH, et al. Eliminating degradation in solid oxide electrochemical cells by reversible operation. Nat Mater 2015, 14: 239–244.

DOI Google Scholar

[27]

Peng C, Melnik J, Luo JL, et al. BaZr_0.8Y_0.2O_3−δ electrolyte with and without ZnO sintering aid: Preparation and characterization. Solid State Ionics 2010, 181: 1372–1377.

DOI Google Scholar

[28]

Dai HL, Xu X, Liu C, et al. Tailoring a LaMnO₃ cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells: Integration of high performance and excellent stability. J Mater Chem A 2021, 9: 12553–12559.

DOI Google Scholar

[29]

Chai P, Liu XJ, Wang ZL, et al. Tunable synthesis, growth mechanism, and magnetic properties of La_0.5Ba_0.5MnO₃. Cryst Growth Des 2007, 7: 2568–2575.

DOI Google Scholar

[30]

Zhu DL, Zhu H, Zhang YH. Hydrothermal synthesis of La_0.5Ba_0.5MnO₃ nanowires. Appl Phys Lett 2002, 80: 1634–1636.

DOI Google Scholar

[31]

Chakraborty A, Devi PS, Maiti HS. Low temperature synthesis and some physical properties of barium-substituted lanthanum manganite (La_1−xBa_xMnO₃). J Mater Res 1995, 10: 918–925.

DOI Google Scholar

[32]

Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B 1996, 54: 11169–11186.

DOI Google Scholar

[33]

Yang X, Yin YR, Yu SF, et al. Gluing Ba_0.5Sr_0.5Co_0.8Fe_0.2O_3−δ with Co₃O₄ as a cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Sci China Mater 2023, 66: 955–963.

DOI Google Scholar

[34]

Zhou W, Ran R, Shao ZP, et al. Barium- and strontium-enriched (Ba_0.5Sr_0.5)_1+xCo_0.8Fe_0.2O_3−δ oxides as high-performance cathodes for intermediate-temperature solid-oxide fuel cells. Acta Mater 2008, 56: 2687–2698.

DOI Google Scholar

[35]

Song YF, Chen YB, Wang W, et al. Self-assembled triple-conducting nanocomposite as a superior protonic ceramic fuel cell cathode. Joule 2019, 3: 2842–2853.

DOI Google Scholar

[36]

Zhao ZY, Cui J, Zou MD, et al. Novel twin-perovskite nanocomposite of Ba–Ce–Fe–Co–O as a promising triple conducting cathode material for protonic ceramic fuel cells. J Power Sources 2020, 450: 227609.

DOI Google Scholar

[37]

Zhang XH, Pei CL, Chang X, et al. FeO₆ octahedral distortion activates lattice oxygen in perovskite ferrite for methane partial oxidation coupled with CO₂ splitting. J Am Chem Soc 2020, 142: 11540–11549.

DOI Google Scholar

[38]

Yin YR, Dai HL, Yu SF, et al. Tailoring cobalt-free La_0.5Sr_0.5FeO_3−δ cathode with a nonmetal cation-doping strategy for high-performance proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. SusMat 2022, 2: 607–616.

DOI Google Scholar

[39]

Xie D, Ling A, Yan D, et al. A comparative study on the composite cathodes with proton conductor and oxygen ion conductor for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cell. Electrochim Acta 2020, 344: 136143.

DOI Google Scholar

[40]

Ji QQ, Xu X, Liu XH, et al. Improvement of the catalytic properties of porous lanthanum manganite for the oxygen reduction reaction by partial substitution of strontium for lanthanum. Electrochem Commun 2021, 124: 106964.

DOI Google Scholar

[41]

Zhu K, Yang Y, Huan DM, et al. Theoretical and experimental investigations on K-doped SrCo_0.9Nb_0.1O_3−δ as a promising cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. ChemSusChem 2021, 14: 3876–3886.

DOI Google Scholar

[42]

Liu B, Li ZB, Yang XW, et al. Novel mixed H⁺/e^–/O²⁻ conducting cathode material PrBa_0.9K_0.1Fe_1.9Zn_0.1O_5+δ for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Mater Chem A 2022, 10: 17425–17433.

DOI Google Scholar

[43]

Xi XA, Liu JW, Luo WZ, et al. Unraveling the enhanced kinetics of Sr₂Fe_1+xMo_1−xO_6−δ electrocatalysts for high-performance solid oxide cells. Adv Energy Mater 2021, 11: 2102845.

DOI Google Scholar

[44]

Dai HL, Yin YR, Li XM, et al. A new Sc-doped La_0.5Sr_0.5MnO_3−δ cathode allows high performance for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Sustain Mater Techno 2022, 32: e00409.

DOI Google Scholar

[45]

Xu YS, Yu SF, Yin YR, et al. Taking advantage of Li-evaporation in LiCoO₂ as cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Adv Ceram 2022, 11: 1849–1859.

DOI Google Scholar

[46]

Zhang LL, Yin YR, Xu YS, et al. Tailoring Sr₂Fe_1.5Mo_0.5O_6−δ with Sc as a new single-phase cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Sci China Mater 2022, 65: 1485–1494.

DOI Google Scholar

[47]

Xu Y, Huang YL, Guo YM, et al. Engineering anion defect in perovskite oxyfluoride cathodes enables proton involved oxygen reduction reaction for protonic ceramic fuel cells. Sep Purif Technol 2022, 290: 120844.

DOI Google Scholar

[48]

Tong H, Fu M, Yang Y, et al. A novel self-assembled cobalt-free perovskite composite cathode with triple-conduction for intermediate proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Adv Funct Mater 2022, 32: 2209695.

DOI Google Scholar

[49]

Chen Y, Yoo S, Pei K, et al. An in situ formed, dual-phase cathode with a highly active catalyst coating for protonic ceramic fuel cells. Adv Funct Mater 2018, 28: 1704907.

DOI Google Scholar

[50]

Parbey J, Wang Q, Lei JL, et al. High-performance solid oxide fuel cells with fiber-based cathodes for low-temperature operation. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2020, 45: 6949–6957.

DOI Google Scholar

[51]

Wang Q, Hou J, Fan Y, et al. Pr₂BaNiMnO_7−δ double-layered Ruddlesden–Popper perovskite oxides as efficient cathode electrocatalysts for low temperature proton conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Mater Chem A 2020, 8: 7704–7712.

DOI Google Scholar

[52]

Hou J, Wang Q, Li J, et al. Rational design of an in-situ co-assembly nanocomposite cathode La_0.5Sr_1.5MnO_4+δ–La_0.5Sr_0.5MnO_3−δ for lower-temperature proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources 2020, 466: 228240.

DOI Google Scholar

[53]

Wu S, Xu X, Li XM, et al. High-performance proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells using the first-generation Sr-doped LaMnO₃ cathode tailored with Zn ions. Sci China Mater 2022, 65: 675–682.

DOI Google Scholar

[54]

Liu ZX, Liu XH, Wu GL, et al. Electrospun La_0.5Sr_0.5 Mn_0.875Zn_0.125O_3−δ nano-powders as a single-phase cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Ceram Int 2022, 48: 25228–25235.

DOI Google Scholar

[55]

Yin YR, Yu SF, Dai HL, et al. Triggering interfacial activity of the traditional La_0.5Sr_0.5MnO₃ cathode with Co-doping for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Mater Chem A 2022, 10: 1726–1734.

DOI Google Scholar

[56]

Wang M, Su C, Zhu ZH, et al. Composite cathodes for protonic ceramic fuel cells: Rationales and materials. Compos Part B-Eng 2022, 238: 109881.

DOI Google Scholar

[57]

Muñoz-García AB, Tuccillo M, Pavone M. Computational design of cobalt-free mixed proton–electron conductors for solid oxide electrochemical cells. J Mater Chem A 2017, 5: 11825–11833.

DOI Google Scholar

[58]

Yin YR, Zhou YB, Gu YY, et al. Successful preparation of BaCo_0.5Fe_0.5O_3−δ cathode oxide by rapidly cooling allowing for high-performance proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Adv Ceram 2023, 12: 587–597.

DOI Google Scholar

About this article

Publication history

Acknowledgements

Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 28 January 2023

Revised: 08 March 2023

Accepted: 26 March 2023

Published: 19 May 2023

Issue date: June 2023

Copyright

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52272216 and 51972183), the Hundred Youth Talents Program of Hunan, and the Startup Funding for Talents at University of South China. Rui Zhou and Xuan Yang appreciate the support from the Hunan University Student Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program (Grant No. S202210555343)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.