References(59)
[1]
Wang SY, Jiang SP. Prospects of fuel cell technologies. Nat Sci Rev 2017, 4: 163–166.
[2]
Zhang Y, Chen B, Guan DQ, et al. Thermal-expansion offset for high-performance fuel cell cathodes. Nature 2021, 591: 246–251.
[3]
Zhang YW, Mei J, Yan C, et al. Bioinspired 2D nanomaterials for sustainable applications. Adv Mater 2020, 32: e1902806.
[4]
Mei J, Liao T, Liang J, et al. Toward promising cathode catalysts for nonlithium metal–oxygen batteries. Adv Energy Mater 2020, 10: 1901997.
[5]
Wei T, Qiu P, Yang J, et al. High-performance direct carbon dioxide-methane solid oxide fuel cell with a structure-engineered double-layer anode. J Power Sources 2021, 484: 229199.
[6]
Li PZ, Yang W, Tian CJ, et al. Electrochemical performance of La2NiO4+δ–Ce0.55La0.45O2−δ as a promising bifunctional oxygen electrode for reversible solid oxide cells. J Adv Ceram 2021, 10: 328–337.
[7]
Zvonareva IA, Mineev AM, Tarasova NA, et al. High-temperature transport properties of BaSn1−xScxO3−δ ceramic materials as promising electrolytes for protonic ceramic fuel cells. J Adv Ceram 2022, 11: 1131–1143.
[8]
He F, Gao QN, Liu ZQ, et al. A new Pd doped proton conducting perovskite oxide with multiple functionalities for efficient and stable power generation from ammonia at reduced temperatures. Adv Energy Mater 2021, 11: 2003916.
[9]
Chen M, Xie XB, Guo JH, et al. Space charge layer effect at the platinum anode/BaZr0.9Y0.1O3−δ electrolyte interface in proton ceramic fuel cells. J Mater Chem A 2020, 8: 12566–12575.
[10]
Chen M, Chen DC, Wang K, et al. Densification and electrical conducting behavior of BaZr0.9Y0.1O3−δ proton conducting ceramics with NiO additive. J Alloys Compd 2019, 781: 857–865.
[11]
Wu S, Xu X, Li XM, et al. High-performance proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells using the first-generation Sr-doped LaMnO3 cathode tailored with Zn ions. Sci China Mater 2022, 65: 675–682.
[12]
Cao D, Zhou MY, Yan XM, et al. High performance low-temperature tubular protonic ceramic fuel cells based on Barium cerate-zirconate electrolyte. Electrochem Commun 2021, 125: 106986.
[13]
Bu YF, Joo S, Zhang YX, et al. A highly efficient composite cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources 2020, 451: 227812.
[14]
Tarutin AP, Lyagaeva JG, Medvedev DA, et al. Recent advances in layered Ln2NiO4+δ nickelates: Fundamentals and prospects of their applications in protonic ceramic fuel and electrolysis cells. J Mater Chem A 2021, 9: 154–195.
[15]
Xie D, Li K, Yang J, et al. High-performance La0.5(Ba0.75Ca0.25)0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3−δ cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Int J Hydrog Energy 2021, 46: 10007–10014.
[16]
Yin YR, Dai HL, Yu SF, et al. Tailoring cobalt-free La0.5Sr0.5FeO3−δ cathode with a nonmetal cation-doping strategy for high-performance proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. SusMat 2022, 2: 607–616.
[17]
Song YF, Chen YB, Wang W, et al. Self-assembled triple-conducting nanocomposite as a superior protonic ceramic fuel cell cathode. Joule 2019, 3: 2842–2853.
[18]
Ding HP, Wu W, Jiang C, et al. Self-sustainable protonic ceramic electrochemical cells using a triple conducting electrode for hydrogen and power production. Nat Commun 2020, 11: 1907.
[19]
Ling YH, Guo TM, Guo YY, et al. New two-layer Ruddlesden–Popper cathode materials for protonic ceramics fuel cells. J Adv Ceram 2021, 10: 1052–1060.
[20]
Xia YP, Jin ZZ, Wang HQ, et al. A novel cobalt-free cathode with triple-conduction for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells with unprecedented performance. J Mater Chem A 2019, 7: 16136–16148.
[21]
Li J, Hou J, Lu Y, et al. Ca-containing Ba0.95Ca0.05Co0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3−δ cathode with high CO2-poisoning tolerance for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources 2020, 453: 227909.
[22]
Meng YQ, Duffy J, Na BT, et al. Oxygen exchange and bulk diffusivity of BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3−δ: Quantitative assessment of active cathode material for protonic ceramic fuel cells. Solid State Ion 2021, 368: 115639.
[23]
Duan CC, Tong JH, Shang M, et al. Readily processed protonic ceramic fuel cells with high performance at low temperatures. Science 2015, 349: 1321–1326.
[24]
Liang MZ, He F, Zhou C, et al. Nickel-doped BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3−δ as a new high-performance cathode for both oxygen-ion and proton conducting fuel cells. Chem Eng J 2021, 420: 127717.
[25]
Zhou W, Ran R, Shao ZP. Progress in understanding and development of Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3−δ-based cathodes for intermediate-temperature solid-oxide fuel cells: A review. J Power Sources 2009, 192: 231–246.
[26]
Shao ZP, Haile SM. A high-performance cathode for the next generation of solid-oxide fuel cells. Nature 2004, 431: 170–173.
[27]
Guo YM, Lin Y, Ran R, et al. Zirconium doping effect on the performance of proton-conducting BaZryCe0.8−yY0.2O3−δ (0.0 ≤ y ≤ 0.8) for fuel cell applications. J Power Sources 2009, 193: 400–407.
[28]
Li XM, Liu YH, Liu WY, et al. Mo-doping allows high performance for a perovskite cathode applied in proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Sustainable Energy Fuels 2021, 5: 4261–4267.
[29]
Bi L, Shafi SP, Da'as EH, et al. Tailoring the cathode-electrolyte interface with nanoparticles for boosting the solid oxide fuel cell performance of chemically stable proton-conducting electrolytes. Small 2018, 14: e1801231.
[30]
Xu YS, Xu X, Cao N, et al. Perovskite ceramic oxide as an efficient electrocatalyst for nitrogen fixation. Int J Hydrog Energy 2021, 46: 10293–10302.
[31]
Wang B, Liu XH, Bi L, et al. Fabrication of high-performance proton-conducting electrolytes from microwave prepared ultrafine powders for solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources 2019, 412: 664–669.
[32]
Kresse G, Joubert D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 1999, 59: 1758–1775.
[33]
Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B Condens Matter 1996, 54: 11169–11186.
[34]
Xu X, Wang HQ, Fronzi M, et al. Tailoring cations in a perovskite cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells with high performance. J Mater Chem A 2019, 7: 20624–20632.
[35]
Yang X, Yin YR, Yu SF, et al. Gluing Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3−δ with Co3O4 as a cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Sci China Mater 2022, .
[36]
Xu YS, Yu SF, Yin YR, et al. Taking advantage of Li-evaporation in LiCoO2 as cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Adv Ceram 2022, 11: 1849–1859.
[37]
Xi XA, Liu JW, Fan Y, et al. Reducing d-p band coupling to enhance CO2 electrocatalytic activity by Mg-doping in Sr2FeMoO6−δ double perovskite for high performance solid oxide electrolysis cells. Nano Energy 2021, 82: 105707.
[38]
Ji QQ, Xu X, Liu XH, et al. Improvement of the catalytic properties of porous lanthanum manganite for the oxygen reduction reaction by partial substitution of strontium for lanthanum. Electrochem Commun 2021, 124: 106964.
[39]
Chen C, Wang XT, Zhong JH, et al. Epitaxially grown heterostructured SrMn3O6–x–SrMnO3 with high-valence Mn3+/4+ for improved oxygen reduction catalysis. Angew Chem Int Ed 2021, 60: 22043–22050.
[40]
Xu YS, Liu XH, Cao N, et al. Defect engineering for electrocatalytic nitrogen reduction reaction at ambient conditions. Sustain Mater Technol 2021, 27: e00229.
[41]
Tao ZR, Xu X, Bi L. Density functional theory calculations for cathode materials of proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells: A mini-review. Electrochem Commun 2021, 129: 107072.
[42]
Zhang XH, Pei CL, Chang X, et al. FeO6 octahedral distortion activates lattice oxygen in perovskite ferrite for methane partial oxidation coupled with CO2 splitting. J Am Chem Soc 2020, 142: 11540–11549.
[43]
Xu X, Xu YS, Ma JM, et al. Tailoring electronic structure of perovskite cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells with high performance. J Power Sources 2021, 489: 229486.
[44]
Zhou W, Shao ZP, Ran R, et al. A novel efficient oxideelectrode for electrocatalytic oxygen reduction at 400–600 ℃. Chem Commun 2008: 5791–5793.
[45]
Xie Y, Shi N, Huan DM, et al. A stable and efficient cathode for fluorine-containing proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. ChemSusChem 2018, 11: 3423–3430.
[46]
Pikalova E, Kolchugin A, Koroleva M, et al. Functionality of an oxygen Ca3Co4O9+δ electrode for reversible solid oxide electrochemical cells based on proton-conducting electrolytes. J Power Sources 2019, 438: 226996.
[47]
Ren RZ, Wang ZH, Meng XG, et al. Tailoring the oxygen vacancy to achieve fast intrinsic proton transport in a perovskite cathode for protonic ceramic fuel cells. ACS Appl Energy Mater 2020, 3: 4914–4922.
[48]
Wang Q, Hou J, Fan Y, et al. Pr2BaNiMnO7–δ double-layered Ruddlesden–Popper perovskite oxides as efficient cathode electrocatalysts for low temperature proton conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Mater Chem A 2020, 8: 7704–7712.
[49]
Zhou X, Hou NJ, Gan T, et al. Enhanced oxygen reduction reaction activity of BaCe0.2Fe0.8O3−δ cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells via Pr-doping. J Power Sources 2021, 495: 229776.
[50]
Xu Y, Hu F, Guo YM, et al. Probing oxygen reduction and water uptake kinetics of BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1−xZnxO3−δ cathodes for protonic ceramic fuel cells. Sep Purif Technol 2022, 297: 121482.
[51]
Zhang LL, Yin YR, Xu YS, et al. Tailoring Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6−δ with Sc as a new single-phase cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Sci China Mater 2022, 65: 1485–1494.
[52]
Yin YR, Yu SF, Dai HL, et al. Triggering interfacial activity of the traditional La0.5Sr0.5MnO3 cathode with Co-doping for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Mater Chem A 2022, 10: 1726–1734.
[53]
Zhang LL, Dai G, Yu SF, et al. BaTb0.3Fe0.7O3–δ: A new proton-conductor-derived cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Sustainable Energy Fuels 2022, 6: 4375–4382.
[54]
Ma ZL, Ye QR, Zhang BK, et al. A highly efficient and robust bifunctional perovskite-type air electrode with triple-conducting behavior for low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Adv Funct Mater 2022, 32: 2209054.
[55]
Zou D, Yi YN, Song YF, et al. The BaCe0.16Y0.04Fe0.8O3–δ nanocomposite: A new high-performance cobalt-free triple-conducting cathode for protonic ceramic fuel cells operating at reduced temperatures. J Mater Chem A 2022, 10: 5381–5390.
[56]
Jing JM, Lei Z, Wu Z, et al. Ba0.95La0.05Fe0.8Ni0.2O3−δ perovskite as efficient cathode electrocatalysts for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Eur Ceram Soc 2022, 42: 6566–6573.
[57]
Dai HL, Yin YR, Li XM, et al. A new Sc-doped La0.5Sr0.5MnO3−δ cathode allows high performance for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Sustain Mater Technol 2022, 32: e00409.
[58]
Xu YS, Xu X, Bi L. A high-entropy spinel ceramic oxide as the cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J Adv Ceram 2022, 11: 794–804.
[59]
Muñoz-García AB, Tuccillo M, Pavone M. Computational design of cobalt-free mixed proton-electron conductors for solid oxide electrochemical cells. J Mater Chem A 2017, 5: 11825–11833.