Journal Home > Volume 12 , Issue 3

A porous ceramic support is designed as a multi-functional independent catalyst layer for solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) running on liquid hydrocarbon fuel. The layer consists of a highly porous Ce0.9Ca0.1O2−δ ceramic backbone and active NiMo catalysts, which could be integrated into the conventional Ni metal containing the anode for internal reforming of the hydrocarbon fuel. Compared to conventional catalyst layers sintered on the anodes, this independent catalyst layer could be simply assembled on top of the anode without additional sintering, thereby avoiding the mismatch of the thermal expansion coefficient between the catalyst layer and the anode and improving stability of a single cell. Moreover, a current collector layer could be inserted between the catalyst and the anode to enhance current collection efficiency and electrochemical performance of the single cell. At 750 ℃, the independent catalyst layer displays high activity towards the catalytic decomposition of methanol, and the single cell could achieve the maximum power density of 400–500 mW·cm−2 in dry methanol. Furthermore, by employing the independent catalyst layer, the single cell offers additional in-situ catalyst regeneration capability under the methanol operation mode. Feeding 10 mL·min−1 air into an anode channel for 5 min is found to be effective to burn out carbon species in the catalyst layer, which reduces the degradation rate of the cell voltage by orders of magnitude from 2.6 to 0.024 mV·h−1 during the operation of 360 h in dry methanol. The results demonstrate the significance of the independent catalyst layer design for direct internal reforming methanol fuel cells.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
Electronic supplementary material
About this article

Functional ceramic support as an independent catalyst layer for direct liquid fuel solid oxide fuel cells

Show Author's information Jie Luoa,bKai Zhaoa,b( )Jishi Zhaoc,d( )Jun Lia,bYihui LiueDongchu Chena,bQing XufMin Chena,b
School of Materials Science and Hydrogen Energy, Foshan University, Foshan 528000, China
Guangdong Key Laboratory for Hydrogen Energy Technologies, Foshan University, Foshan 528000, China
Foshan Institute of Environment and Energy Technology, Foshan 528000, China
R&D Center of Hydrogen Energy Standardization, Yunfu 527300, China
Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Automotive Components & Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Automotive Components Technology, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China

Abstract

A porous ceramic support is designed as a multi-functional independent catalyst layer for solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) running on liquid hydrocarbon fuel. The layer consists of a highly porous Ce0.9Ca0.1O2−δ ceramic backbone and active NiMo catalysts, which could be integrated into the conventional Ni metal containing the anode for internal reforming of the hydrocarbon fuel. Compared to conventional catalyst layers sintered on the anodes, this independent catalyst layer could be simply assembled on top of the anode without additional sintering, thereby avoiding the mismatch of the thermal expansion coefficient between the catalyst layer and the anode and improving stability of a single cell. Moreover, a current collector layer could be inserted between the catalyst and the anode to enhance current collection efficiency and electrochemical performance of the single cell. At 750 ℃, the independent catalyst layer displays high activity towards the catalytic decomposition of methanol, and the single cell could achieve the maximum power density of 400–500 mW·cm−2 in dry methanol. Furthermore, by employing the independent catalyst layer, the single cell offers additional in-situ catalyst regeneration capability under the methanol operation mode. Feeding 10 mL·min−1 air into an anode channel for 5 min is found to be effective to burn out carbon species in the catalyst layer, which reduces the degradation rate of the cell voltage by orders of magnitude from 2.6 to 0.024 mV·h−1 during the operation of 360 h in dry methanol. The results demonstrate the significance of the independent catalyst layer design for direct internal reforming methanol fuel cells.

Keywords: methanol, solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC), independent catalyst layer, NiMo–Ce0.9Ca0.1O2−δ catalyst, internal reforming

References(52)

[1]
Xu QD, Guo ZJ, Xia LC, et al. A comprehensive review of solid oxide fuel cells operating on various promising alternative fuels. Energy Convers Manage 2022, 253: 115175.
[2]
Zhang PP, Yang ZB, Jin YQ, et al. Progress report on the catalyst layers for hydrocarbon-fueled SOFCs. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2021, 46: 39369–39386.
[3]
Hussain F, Ahmad MA, Raza R, et al. Electrochemical investigation of multi-fuel based low temperature nano-composite anode for solid oxide fuel cell. J Power Sources 2019, 425: 147–152.
[4]
Wei KW, Wang XX, Budiman RA, et al. Progress in Ni-based anode materials for direct hydrocarbon solid oxide fuel cells. J Mater Sci 2018, 53: 8747–8765.
[5]
Lee D, Myung J, Tan J, et al. Direct methane solid oxide fuel cells based on catalytic partial oxidation enabling complete coking tolerance of Ni-based anodes. J Power Sources 2017, 345: 30–40.
[6]
Liang B, Yao Y, Guo J, et al. Propane-fuelled microtubular solid oxide fuel cell stack electrically connected by an anodic rectangular window. Appl Energy 2022, 309: 118404.
[7]
Sengodan S, Lan R, Humphreys J, et al. Advances in reforming and partial oxidation of hydrocarbons for hydrogen production and fuel cell applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2018, 82: 761–780.
[8]
Qiu P, Sun SC, Yang X, et al. A review on anode on-cell catalyst reforming layer for direct methane solid oxide fuel cells. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2021, 46: 25208–25224.
[9]
Jang DY, Koo J, Choi HR, et al. Coke-free oxidation of methanol in solid oxide fuel cells with heterogeneous nickel–palladium catalysts prepared by atomic layer deposition. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2020, 8: 10529–10535.
[10]
Lyu ZW, Wang YG, Zhang YL, et al. Solid oxide fuel cells fueled by simulated biogas: Comparison of anode modification by infiltration and reforming catalytic layer. Chem Eng J 2020, 393: 124755.
[11]
Zhao K, Kim BH, Du YH, et al. Ceria catalyst for inert-substrate-supported tubular solid oxide fuel cells running on methane fuel. J Power Sources 2016, 314: 10–17.
[12]
Augusto BL, Noronha FB, Fonseca FC, et al. Nickel/gadolinium-doped ceria anode for direct ethanol solid oxide fuel cell. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2014, 39: 11196–11209.
[13]
Nobrega SD, Gelin P, Georges S, et al. A fuel-flexible solid oxide fuel cell operating in gradual internal reforming. J Electrochem Soc 2014, 161: F354–F359.
[14]
Shi N, Xie Y, Yang Y, et al. Review of anodic reactions in hydrocarbon fueled solid oxide fuel cells and strategies to improve anode performance and stability. Mater Renew Sustain 2020, 9: 6.
[15]
Huang B, Zhu XJ, Hu WQ, et al. Characterization of the Ni–ScSZ anode with a LSCM–CeO2 catalyst layer in thin film solid oxide fuel cell running on ethanol fuel. J Power Sources 2010, 195: 3053–3059.
[16]
Cui DA, Yang CH, Huang K, et al. Effects of testing configurations and cell geometries on the performance of a SOFC: A modeling approach. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2010, 35: 10495–10504.
[17]
Bochentyn B, Błaszczak P, Gazda M, et al. Investigation of praseodymium and samarium co-doped ceria as an anode catalyst for DIR-SOFC fueled by biogas. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2020, 45: 29131–29142.
[18]
Senthil Kumar S, Aruna ST. Hydrocarbon compatible SOFC anode catalysts and their syntheses: A review. Sustain Chem 2021, 2: 707–763.
[19]
Rosensteel WA, Babiniec SM, Storjohann DD, et al. Use of anode barrier layers in tubular solid-oxide fuel cells for robust operation on hydrocarbon fuels. J Power Sources 2012, 205: 108–113.
[20]
Zhao K, Du YH. Calcium-doped ceria materials for anode of solid oxide fuel cells running on methane fuel. J Power Sources 2017, 347: 79–85.
[21]
Zhao K, Cheng G, Hu SZ, et al. NiMo–calcium-doped ceria catalysts for inert-substrate-supported tubular solid oxide fuel cells running on isooctane. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2020, 45: 29367–29378.
[22]
Majewski AJ, Singh SK, Labhasetwar NK, et al. Nickel–molybdenum catalysts for combined solid oxide fuel cell internal steam and dry reforming. Chem Eng Sci 2021, 232: 116341.
[23]
Lin ZX, Zhao K, Cheng G, et al. Catalyst layer supported solid oxide fuel cells running on methane. J Power Sources 2021, 507: 230317.
[24]
Han B, Zhao K, Hou XX, et al. Ni–(Ce0.8−xTix)Sm0.2O2−δ anode for low temperature solid oxide fuel cells running on dry methane fuel. J Power Sources 2017, 338: 1–8.
[25]
Ong PS, Tan YP, Taufiq-Yap YH, et al. Improved sinterability and conductivity enhancement of 10-mol% calcium-doped ceria using different fuel-aided combustion reactions and its structural characterisation. Mater Sci Eng B 2014, 185: 26–36.
[26]
Laurencin J, Quey R, Delette G, et al. Characterisation of solid oxide fuel cell Ni–8YSZ substrate by synchrotron X-ray nano-tomography: From 3D reconstruction to microstructure quantification. J Power Sources 2012, 198: 182–189.
[27]
Zhao K, Kim BH, Xu Q, et al. Performance improvement of inert-substrate-supported tubular single cells via microstructure modification. J Power Sources 2015, 274: 799–805.
[28]
Lo Faro M, Stassi A, Antonucci V, et al. Direct utilization of methanol in solid oxide fuel cells: An electrochemical and catalytic study. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2011, 36: 9977–9986.
[29]
Fukui T, Ohara S, Naito M, et al. Performance and stability of SOFC anode fabricated from NiO–YSZ composite particles. J Power Sources 2002, 110: 91–95.
[30]
Sekhar PK, Brosha EL, Mukundan R, et al. Effect of yttria-stabilized zirconia sintering temperature on mixed potential sensor performance. Solid State Ionics 2010, 181: 947–953.
[31]
Bkour Q, Che FL, Lee KM, et al. Enhancing the partial oxidation of gasoline with Mo-doped Ni catalysts for SOFC applications: An integrated experimental and DFT study. Appl Catal B Environ 2020, 266: 118626.
[32]
Chen XY, Ni WJ, Du XJ, et al. Electrochemical property of multi-layer anode supported solid oxide fuel cell fabricated through sequential tape-casting and co-firing. J Mater Sci Technol 2019, 35: 695–701.
[33]
Dogdibegovic E, Fukuyama Y, Tucker MC. Ethanol internal reforming in solid oxide fuel cells: A path toward high performance metal-supported cells for vehicular applications. J Power Sources 2020, 449: 227598.
[34]
Buccheri MA, Singh A, Hill JM. Anode-versus electrolyte-supported Ni–YSZ/YSZ/Pt SOFCs: Effect of cell design on OCV, performance and carbon formation for the direct utilization of dry methane. J Power Sources 2011, 196: 968–976.
[35]
Zhao K, Hou XX, Norton MG, et al. Application of a NiMo–Ce0.5Zr0.5O2−δ catalyst for solid oxide fuel cells running on gasoline. J Power Sources 2019, 435: 226732.
[36]
Bian LZ, Chen ZY, Wang LJ, et al. Electrochemical performance and carbon deposition of anode-supported solid oxide fuel cell exposed to H2–CO fuels. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2017, 42: 14246–14252.
[37]
Li P, Wang RJ, Yan F. Effect of Pr addition into Ni based anode on direct methanol fueled solid oxide fuel cell. J Electroanal Chem 2020, 859: 113846.
[38]
Park SY, Ahn JH, Jeong CW, et al. Ni–YSZ-supported tubular solid oxide fuel cells with GDC interlayer between YSZ electrolyte and LSCF cathode. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2014, 39: 12894–12903.
[39]
Dierickx S, Weber A, Ivers-Tiffée E. How the distribution of relaxation times enhances complex equivalent circuit models for fuel cells. Electrochim Acta 2020, 355: 136764.
[40]
Sumi H, Yamaguchi T, Hamamoto K, et al. AC impedance characteristics for anode-supported microtubular solid oxide fuel cells. Electrochim Acta 2012, 67: 159–165.
[41]
Le Gal la Salle A, Ricoul F, Joubert O, et al. Electrochemical study of a SOFC with various H2–CO–CH4–CO2–N2 gaseous mixtures. Fuel Cells 2017, 17: 144–150.
[42]
Chen DJ, Ran R, Zhang K, et al. Intermediate-temperature electrochemical performance of a polycrystalline PrBaCo2O5+δ cathode on samarium-doped ceria electrolyte. J Power Sources 2009, 188: 96–105.
[43]
Li PZ, Yang W, Tian CJ, et al. Electrochemical performance of La2NiO4+δ–Ce0.55La0.45O2−δ as a promising bifunctional oxygen electrode for reversible solid oxide cells. J Adv Ceram 2021, 10: 328–337.
[44]
Fonseca FC, de Florio DZ, Esposito V, et al. Mixed ionic-electronic YSZ/Ni composite for SOFC anodes with high electrical conductivity. J Electrochem Soc 2006, 153: A354–A360.
[45]
Abrantes JCC, Pérez-Coll D, Núñez P, et al. Electronic transport in Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9−δ ceramics under reducing conditions. Electrochim Acta 2003, 48: 2761–2766.
[46]
Zhu B, Mi YQ, Xia C, et al. A nanoscale perspective on solid oxide and semiconductor membrane fuel cells: Materials and technology. Energy Mater 2021, 1: 100002.
[47]
Cai HD, Zhang LL, Xu JS, et al. Cobalt-free La0.5Sr0.5Fe0.9Mo0.1O3−δ electrode for symmetrical SOFC running on H2 and CO fuels. Electrochim Acta 2019, 320: 134642.
[48]
Endo N, Fukumoto T, Ushijima R, et al. DRT analysis of solid oxide electrolysis cells: Polarization resistance of fuel electrodes. ECS Trans 2021, 103: 1981–1989.
[49]
Wang YG, Lyu ZW, Han MF, et al. Initial-stage performance evolution of solid oxide fuel cells based on polarization analysis. ECS Trans 2021, 103: 1261–1269.
[50]
Zhang PP, Yang YR, Yang ZB, et al. Direct power generation from methanol by solid oxide fuel cells with a Cu-ceria based catalyst layer. Renew Energy 2022, 194: 439–447.
[51]
Neofytidis C, Dracopoulos V, Neophytides SG, et al. Electrocatalytic performance and carbon tolerance of ternary Au–Mo–Ni/GDC SOFC anodes under CH4-rich Internal Steam Reforming conditions. Catal Today 2018, 310: 157–165.
[52]
Shabri HA, Rudin SNFM, Othman MHD, et al. Sol–gel based copper metallic layer as external anode for microtubular solid oxide fuel cell. Int J Energ Res 2022, 46: 13541–13555.
File
JAC0697_ESM.pdf (822.7 KB)
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 15 July 2022
Revised: 19 November 2022
Accepted: 20 November 2022
Published: 15 February 2023
Issue date: March 2023

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2022.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22005051), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (Nos. 2019A1515110237 and 2022A1515012001), Young Creative Talents Project of the Guangdong Provincial Department of Education (No. 2019KQNCX166), and Innovation Research Project of University in Foshan City (No. 2020XCC09). Grateful acknowledgements are extended to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51872047), Key Project Plat Form Programs and Technology Innovation Team Project of Guangdong Provincial Department of Education (Nos. 2019KZDXM039, 2019GCZX002, and 2020KCXTD011), and Guangdong Provincial Key Research and Development Plan (No. 2020B090920001).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Return