AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Journal of Advanced Ceramics Article
PDF (1.6 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

Metal oxide semiconductor gas sensing materials for early lung cancer diagnosis

Xiaoxi Hea, Hongfeng Chaia, Yifan Luoa,c, Lingfeng Minb, Marc Debliquyc, Chao Zhanga( )
School of Mechanical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Northern Jiangsu People’s Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225001, China
Service de Science des Matériaux, Faculté Polytechnique, Université de Mons, Mons 7000, Belgium
Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

The urgency of early lung cancer (LC) diagnosis and treatment has been more and more significant. Exhaled breath analysis using gas sensors is a promising way to find out if someone has LC due to its low-cost, non-invasive, and real-time monitoring compared with traditional invasive diagnostic techniques. Among sensor-based gas detection techniques, metal oxide semiconductor’s gas sensors are one of the most important types. This review presents the-state-of-art in metal oxide gas sensors for the diagnosis of early LC. First, the exhaled breath biomarkers are described with emphasis on the concentration of abnormal volatile organic compounds (VOCs) caused by the metabolic process of LC cells. Then, the research status of metal oxide gas sensors in LC diagnosis is summarized. The sensing performance and enhancement strategy of biomarkers provided by metal oxide semiconductor materials are reviewed. Another effective way to improve VOC detection performance is to build a gas sensor array. At the same time, various gas sensors combined with self-powered techniques are mentioned to display a broad development prospect in breath diagnosis. Finally, metal oxide gas sensor-based LC diagnosis is prospected.

Keywords

gas sensorsmetal oxidesexhaled breath analysislung cancer (LC) diagnosis

References

[1]
Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA-Cancer J Clin 2015, 65: 87–108.
Crossref Google Scholar
[2]
Tanoue LT, Tanner NT, Gould MK, et al. Lung cancer screening. Am J Resp Crit Care 2015, 191: 19–33.
Crossref Google Scholar
[3]
Reddy C, Chilla D, Boltax J. Lung cancer screening: A review of available data and current guidelines. Hospital Practice 2011, 39: 107–112.
Crossref Google Scholar
[4]
Yorifuji T, Kashima S. Air pollution: Another cause of lung cancer. Lancet Oncol 2013, 14: 788–789.
Crossref Google Scholar
[5]
Deng XB, Zhang F, Rui W, et al. PM2.5-induced oxidative stress triggers autophagy in human lung epithelial A549 cells. Toxicol in Vitro 2013, 27: 1762–1770.
Crossref Google Scholar
[6]
Cheema PK, Rothenstein J, Melosky B, et al. Perspectives on treatment advances for stage III locally advanced unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer. Curr Oncol 2019, 26: 37–42.
Crossref Google Scholar
[7]
Khatoon Z, Fouad H, Alothman OY, et al. Doped SnO2 nanomaterials for e-nose based electrochemical sensing of biomarkers of lung cancer. ACS Omega 2020, 5: 27645–27654.
Crossref Google Scholar
[8]
Mirzaei A, Leonardi SG, Neri G. Detection of hazardous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by metal oxide nanostructures-based gas sensors: A review. Ceram Int 2016, 42: 15119–15141.
Crossref Google Scholar
[9]
Pauling L, Robinson AB, Teranishi R, et al. Quantitative analysis of urine vapor and breath by gas-liquid partition chromatography. PNAS 1971, 68: 2374–2376.
Crossref Google Scholar
[10]
Hakim M, Broza YY, Barash O, et al. Volatile organic compounds of lung cancer and possible biochemical pathways. Chem Rev 2012, 112: 5949–5966.
Crossref Google Scholar
[11]
Kourlaba G, Gkiozos I, Kokkotou E, et al. Lung cancer patients’ journey from first symptom to treatment: Results from a Greek registry. Cancer Epidemiol 2019, 60: 193–200.
Crossref Google Scholar
[12]
Adiguzel Y, Kulah H. Breath sensors for lung cancer diagnosis. Biosens Bioelectron 2015, 65: 121–138.
Crossref Google Scholar
[13]
Luo YF, Ly A, Lahem D, et al. A novel low-concentration isopropanol gas sensor based on Fe-doped ZnO nanoneedles and its gas sensing mechanism. J Mater Sci 2021, 56: 3230–3245.
Crossref Google Scholar
[14]
Zhou JM, Huang ZA, Kumar U, et al. Review of recent developments in determining volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath as biomarkers for lung cancer diagnosis. Anal Chim Acta 2017, 996: 1–9.
Crossref Google Scholar
[15]
Thriumani R, Zakaria A, Jeffree AI, et al. A study on VOCs released by lung cancer cell line using GCMS–SPME. Procedia Chem 2016, 20: 1–7.
Crossref Google Scholar
[16]
Liu KW, Zhang C. Volatile organic compounds gas sensor based on quartz crystal microbalance for fruit freshness detection: A review. Food Chem 2021, 334: 127615.
Crossref Google Scholar
[17]
Seiyama T, Kato A, Fujiishi K, et al. A new detector for gaseous components using semiconductive thin films. Anal Chem 1962, 34: 1502–1503.
Crossref Google Scholar
[18]
Blatt R, Bonarini A, Calabró E, et al. Fuzzy k-NN lung cancer identification by an electronic nose. In: Applications of Fuzzy Sets Theory. Francesco M, Sushmita M, Gabriella P, Eds. Berlin, Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007: 261–268.
Crossref
[19]
Uddin ASMI, Phan DT, Chung GS. Low temperature acetylene gas sensor based on Ag nanoparticles-loaded ZnO-reduced graphene oxide hybrid. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2015, 207: 362–369.
Crossref Google Scholar
[20]
Li Y, Lu YL, Wu KD, et al. Microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis of copper oxide-based gas-sensitive nanostructures. Rare Metal 2021, 40: 1477–1493.
Crossref Google Scholar
[21]
Binson VA, Subramoniam M. Artificial Intelligence based breath analysis system for the diagnosis of lung cancer. J Phys Conf Ser 2021, 1950: 012065.
Crossref Google Scholar
[22]
Liu B, Yu HQ, Zeng XP, et al. Lung cancer detection via breath by electronic nose enhanced with a sparse group feature selection approach. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2021, 339: 129896.
Crossref Google Scholar
[23]
Qiang Z, Ma SY, Jiao HY, et al. Highly sensitive and selective ethanol sensors using porous SnO2 hollow spheres. Ceram Int 2016, 42: 18983–18990.
Crossref Google Scholar
[24]
Karmaoui M, Leonardi SG, Latino M, et al. Pt-decorated In2O3 nanoparticles and their ability as a highly sensitive (< 10 ppb) acetone sensor for biomedical applications. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2016, 230: 697–705.
Crossref
[25]
Hsu NS, Tehei M, Hossain MS, et al. Oxi-redox selective breast cancer treatment: An in vitro study of theranostic In-based oxide nanoparticles for controlled generation or prevention of oxidative stress. ACS Appl Mater Inter 2021, 13: 2204–2217.
Crossref Google Scholar
[26]
Di Gilio A, Catino A, Lombardi A, et al. Breath analysis for early detection of malignant pleural mesothelioma: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) determination and possible biochemical pathways. Cancers 2020, 12: 1262.
Crossref Google Scholar
[27]
Haick H, Broza YY, Mochalski P, et al. Assessment, origin, and implementation of breath volatile cancer markers. Chem Soc Rev 2014, 43: 1423–1449.
Crossref Google Scholar
[28]
Gregis G, Sanchez JB, Bezverkhyy I, et al. Detection and quantification of lung cancer biomarkers by a micro-analytical device using a single metal oxide-based gas sensor. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2018, 255: 391–400.
Crossref Google Scholar
[29]
Lai XY, Cao K, Shen GX, et al. Ordered mesoporous NiFe2O4 with ultrathin framework for low-ppb toluene sensing. Sci Bull 2018, 63: 187–193.
Crossref Google Scholar
[30]
Luo YF, Ly A, Lahem D, et al. Role of cobalt in Co–ZnO nanoflower gas sensors for the detection of low concentration of VOCs. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2022, 360: 131674.
Crossref Google Scholar
[31]
Salimi M, Hosseini SMRM. Smartphone-based detection of lung cancer-related volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using rapid synthesized ZnO nanosheet. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2021, 344: 130127.
Crossref Google Scholar
[32]
Hermawan A, Amrillah T, Riapanitra A, et al. Prospects and challenges of MXenes as emerging sensing materials for flexible and wearable breath-based biomarker diagnosis. Adv Healthc Mater 2021, 10: 2100970.
Crossref Google Scholar
[33]
Güntner AT, Koren V, Chikkadi K, et al. E-nose sensing of low-ppb formaldehyde in gas mixtures at high relative humidity for breath screening of lung cancer? ACS Sens 2016, 1: 528–535.
Crossref Google Scholar
[34]
Shanmugasundaram A, Manorama SV, Kim DS, et al. Toward point-of-care chronic disease management: Biomarker detection in exhaled breath using an e-nose sensor based on rGO/SnO2 superstructures. Chem Eng J 2022, 448: 137736.
Crossref Google Scholar
[35]
Fu XA, Li MX, Knipp RJ, et al. Noninvasive detection of lung cancer using exhaled breath. Cancer Med 2014, 3: 174–181.
Crossref Google Scholar
[36]
Ma W, Gao P, Fan J, et al. Determination of breath gas composition of lung cancer patients using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry with monolithic material sorptive extraction. Biomed Chromatogr 2015, 29: 961–965.
Crossref Google Scholar
[37]
Hu J, Xiong XQ, Guan WW, et al. Self-templated flower-like WO3–In2O3 hollow microspheres for conductometric acetone sensors. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2022, 361: 131705.
Crossref Google Scholar
[38]
Lee J, Choi Y, Park BJ, et al. Precise control of surface oxygen vacancies in ZnO nanoparticles for extremely high acetone sensing response. J Adv Ceram 2022, 11: 769–783.
Crossref Google Scholar
[39]
Liu D, Ren XW, Li YS, et al. Nanowires-assembled WO3 nanomesh for fast detection of ppb-level NO2 at low temperature. J Adv Ceram 2020, 9: 17–26.
Crossref Google Scholar
[40]
Zhang K, Yang X, Wang YZ, et al. Pd-loaded SnO2 ultrathin nanorod-assembled hollow microspheres with the significant improvement for toluene detection. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2017, 243: 465–474.
Crossref Google Scholar
[41]
Samadi S, Nouroozshad M, Zakaria SA. ZnO@SiO2/rGO core/shell nanocomposite: A superior sensitive, selective and reproducible performance for 1-propanol gas sensor at room temperature. Mater Chem Phys 2021, 271: 124884.
Crossref Google Scholar
[42]
Zhang C, Huan YC, Li Y, et al. Low concentration isopropanol gas sensing properties of Ag nanoparticles decorated In2O3 hollow spheres. J Adv Ceram 2022, 11: 379–391.
Crossref Google Scholar
[43]
Kim HJ, Lee JH. Highly sensitive and selective gas sensors using p-type oxide semiconductors: Overview. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2014, 192: 607–627.
Crossref Google Scholar
[44]
Xu JY, Zhang C. Oxygen vacancy engineering on cerium oxide nanowires for room-temperature linalool detection in rice aging. J Adv Ceram 2022, 11: 1559–1570.
Crossref Google Scholar
[45]
Marzorati D, Mainardi L, Sedda G, et al. MOS sensors array for the discrimination of lung cancer and at-risk subjects with exhaled breath analysis. Chemosensors 2021, 9: 209.
Crossref Google Scholar
[46]
Itoh T, Miwa T, Tsuruta A, et al. Development of an exhaled breath monitoring system with semiconductive gas sensors, a gas condenser unit, and gas chromatograph columns. Sensors 2016, 16: 1891.
Crossref Google Scholar
[47]
Masuda Y, Itoh T, Shin W, et al. SnO2 nanosheet/nanoparticle detector for the sensing of 1-nonanal gas produced by lung cancer. Sci Rep 2015, 5: 10122.
Crossref Google Scholar
[48]
Hsu KC, Fang TH, Chen SH, et al. Gas sensitivity and sensing mechanism studies on ZnO/La0.8Sr0.2Co0.5Ni0.5O3 heterojunction structure. Ceram Int 2019, 45: 8744–8749.
Crossref Google Scholar
[49]
Lv L, Cheng PF, Wang YL, et al. Sb-doped three-dimensional ZnFe2O4 macroporous spheres for N-butanol chemiresistive gas sensors. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2020, 320: 128384.
Crossref Google Scholar
[50]
Zhang C, Wu QD, Zheng BB, et al. Synthesis and acetone gas sensing properties of Ag activated hollow sphere structured ZnFe2O4. Ceram Int 2018, 44: 20700–20707.
Crossref Google Scholar
[51]
Guo WW, Huang LL, Liu XC, et al. Enhanced isoprene gas sensing performance based on p-CaFe2O4/n-ZnFe2O4 heterojunction composites. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2022, 354: 131243.
Crossref Google Scholar
[52]
Smiy S, Bejar M, Dhahri E, et al. Ozone detection based on nanostructured La0.8Pb0.1Ca0.1Fe0.8Co0.2O3 thin films. J Alloys Compd 2020, 829: 154596.
Google Scholar
[53]
Kumar D, Chaturvedi P, Saho P, et al. Effect of single wall carbon nanotube networks on gas sensor response and detection limit. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2017, 240: 1134–1140.
Crossref Google Scholar
[54]
Zhang XX, Cui H, Gui YG, et al. Mechanism and application of carbon nanotube sensors in SF6 decomposed production detection: A review. Nanoscale Res Lett 2017, 12: 177.
Crossref Google Scholar
[55]
Lee SW, Lee W, Hong Y, et al. Recent advances in carbon material-based NO2 gas sensors. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2018, 255: 1788–1804.
Crossref Google Scholar
[56]
Freddi S, Emelianov AV, Bobrinetskiy II, et al. Development of a sensing array for human breath analysis based on SWCNT layers functionalized with semiconductor organic molecules. Adv Healthc Mater 2020, 9: 2000377.
Crossref Google Scholar
[57]
Inaba M, Oda T, Kono M, et al. Effect of mixing ratio on NO2 gas sensor response with SnO2-decorated carbon nanotube channels fabricated by one-step dielectrophoretic assembly. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2021, 344: 130257.
Crossref Google Scholar
[58]
Zhang J, Liu XH, Neri G, et al. Nanostructured materials for room-temperature gas sensors. Adv Mater 2016, 28: 795–831.
Crossref Google Scholar
[59]
Mansha M, Qurashi A, Ullah N, et al. Synthesis of In2O3/graphene heterostructure and their hydrogen gas sensing properties. Ceram Int 2016, 42: 11490–11495.
Crossref Google Scholar
[60]
Soleymaniha M, Shahbazi MA, Rafieerad AR, et al. Promoting role of MXene nanosheets in biomedical sciences: Therapeutic and biosensing innovations. Adv Healthc Mater 2019, 8: 1801137.
Crossref Google Scholar
[61]
Liu B, Li YY, Gao L, et al. Ultrafine Pt NPs-decorated SnO2/α-Fe2O3 hollow nanospheres with highly enhanced sensing performances for styrene. J Hazard Mater 2018, 358: 355–365.
Crossref Google Scholar
[62]
Zhou MZ, Liu YC, Su Y, et al. Plasmonic oxygen defects in MO3−x (M = W or Mo) nanomaterials: Synthesis, modifications, and biomedical applications. Adv Healthc Mater 2021, 10: 2101331.
Crossref Google Scholar
[63]
Zhou AG, Liu Y, Li SB, et al. From structural ceramics to 2D materials with multi-applications: A review on the development from MAX phases to MXenes. J Adv Ceram 2021, 10: 1194–1242.
Crossref Google Scholar
[64]
Zheng ZX, Wu W, Yang T, et al. In situ reduced MXene/AuNPs composite toward enhanced charging/discharging and specific capacitance. J Adv Ceram 2021, 10: 1061–1071.
Crossref Google Scholar
[65]
Kim Y, Lee S, Song JG, et al. 2D transition metal dichalcogenide heterostructures for p- and n-type photovoltaic self-powered gas sensor. Adv Funct Mater 2020, 30: 2003360.
Crossref Google Scholar
[66]
Wang S, Jiang YD, Liu BH, et al. Ultrathin Nb2CTx nanosheets-supported polyaniline nanocomposite: Enabling ultrasensitive NH3 detection. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2021, 343: 130069.
Crossref Google Scholar
[67]
Hermawan A, Zhang B, Taufik A, et al. CuO nanoparticles/Ti3C2Tx MXene hybrid nanocomposites for detection of toluene gas. ACS Appl Nano Mater 2020, 3: 4755–4766.
Crossref Google Scholar
[68]
Umar A, Ibrahim AA, Algadi H, et al. Enhanced NO2 gas sensor device based on supramolecularly assembled polyaniline/silver oxide/graphene oxide composites. Ceram Int 2021, 47: 25696–25707.
Crossref Google Scholar
[69]
Duan XH, Duan ZH, Zhang YJ, et al. Enhanced NH3 sensing performance of polyaniline via a facile morphology modification strategy. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2022, 369: 132302.
Crossref Google Scholar
[70]
Bai SL, Tian YL, Cui M, et al. Polyaniline@SnO2 heterojunction loading on flexible PET thin film for detection of NH3 at room temperature. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2016, 226: 540–547.
Crossref Google Scholar
[71]
Koureas M, Kirgou P, Amoutzias G, et al. Target analysis of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath for lung cancer discrimination from other pulmonary diseases and healthy persons. Metabolites 2020, 10: 317.
Crossref Google Scholar
[72]
Kim SJ, Choi SJ, Jang JS, et al. Mesoporous WO3 nanofibers with protein-templated nanoscale catalysts for detection of trace biomarkers in exhaled breath. ACS Nano 2016, 10: 5891–5899.
Crossref Google Scholar
[73]
Huang SP, Wang T, Xiao Q. Effect of Fe doping on the structural and gas sensing properties of ZnO porous microspheres. J Phys Chem Solids 2015, 76: 51–58.
Crossref Google Scholar
[74]
Zhang Y, Han S, Wang MY, et al. Electrospun Cu-doped In2O3 hollow nanofibers with enhanced H2S gas sensing performance. J Adv Ceram 2022, 11: 427–442.
Crossref Google Scholar
[75]
Kortidis I, Lushozi S, Leshabane N, et al. Selective detection of propanol vapour at low operating temperature utilizing ZnO nanostructures. Ceram Int 2019, 45: 16417–16423.
Crossref Google Scholar
[76]
Wang N, Zhou Y, Chen K, et al. Double shell Cu2O hollow microspheres as sensing material for high performance n-propanol sensor. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2021, 333: 129540.
Crossref Google Scholar
[77]
Yin YY, Shen YB, Zhou PF, et al. Fabrication, characterization and n-propanol sensing properties of perovskite-type ZnSnO3 nanospheres based gas sensor. Appl Surf Sci 2020, 509: 145335.
Crossref Google Scholar
[78]
Mokoena TP, Swart HC, Hillie KT, et al. Enhanced propanol gas sensing performance of p-type NiO gas sensor induced by exceptionally large surface area and crystallinity. Appl Surf Sci 2022, 571: 151121.
Crossref Google Scholar
[79]
Zhao YM, Wang S, Zhai X, et al. Construction of Zn/Ni bimetallic organic framework derived ZnO/NiO heterostructure with superior n-propanol sensing performance. ACS Appl Mater Inter 2021, 13: 9206–9215.
Crossref Google Scholar
[80]
Lei GL, Pan HY, Mei HS, et al. Emerging single atom catalysts in gas sensors. Chem Soc Rev 2022, 51: 7260–7280.
Crossref Google Scholar
[81]
Lin CY, Wang WH, Lee CS, et al. Magnetophotoluminescence properties of Co-doped ZnO nanorods. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 94: 151909.
Crossref Google Scholar
[82]
Zhu L, Li YQ, Zeng W. Hydrothermal synthesis of hierarchical flower-like ZnO nanostructure and its enhanced ethanol gas-sensing properties. Appl Surf Sci 2018, 427: 281–287.
Crossref Google Scholar
[83]
Motaung DE, Mhlongo GH, Makgwane PR, et al. Ultra-high sensitive and selective H2 gas sensor manifested by interface of n–n heterostructure of CeO2–SnO2 nanoparticles. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2018, 254: 984–995.
Crossref Google Scholar
[84]
Chen HJ, Bo RH, Shrestha A, et al. NiO–ZnO nanoheterojunction networks for room-temperature volatile organic compounds sensing. Adv Opt Mater 2018, 6: 1800677.
Crossref Google Scholar
[85]
Gregis G, Schaefer S, Sanchez JB, et al. Characterization of materials toward toluene traces detection for air quality monitoring and lung cancer diagnosis. Mater Chem Phys 2017, 192: 374–382.
Crossref Google Scholar
[86]
Wang L, Song SY, Hong B, et al. Highly improved toluene gas-sensing performance of mesoporous Co3O4 nanowires and physical mechanism. Mater Res Bull 2021, 140: 111329.
Crossref Google Scholar
[87]
Bing YF, Liu C, Qiao L, et al. Multistep synthesis of non-spherical SnO2@SnO2 yolk–shell cuboctahedra with nanoparticle-assembled porous structure for toluene detection. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2016, 231: 365–375.
Crossref Google Scholar
[88]
Wang TY, Xu HY, Wang YZ, et al. Porous SnO2 triple-shelled hollow nanoboxes for high sensitive toluene detection. Mater Lett 2020, 264: 127320.
Crossref Google Scholar
[89]
Qiao L, Bing YF, Wang YZ, et al. Enhanced toluene sensing performances of Pd-loaded SnO2 cubic nanocages with porous nanoparticle-assembled shells. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2017, 241: 1121–1129.
Crossref Google Scholar
[90]
Saalberg Y, Wolff M. VOC breath biomarkers in lung cancer. Clin Chim Acta 2016, 459: 5–9.
Crossref Google Scholar
[91]
Nasiri N, Clarke C. Nanostructured chemiresistive gas sensors for medical applications. Sensors 2019, 19: 462.
Crossref Google Scholar
[92]
Buszewski B, Ligor T, Jezierski T, et al. Identification of volatile lung cancer markers by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry: Comparison with discrimination by canines. Anal Bioanal Chem 2012, 404: 141–146.
Crossref Google Scholar
[93]
Zito CA, Perfecto TM, Oliveira TNT, et al. Bicone-like ZnO structure as high-performance butanone sensor. Mater Lett 2018, 223: 142–145.
Crossref Google Scholar
[94]
Zhang YQ, Wang C, Zhao LJ, et al. Preparation of Ce-doped SnO2 cuboids with enhanced 2-butanone sensing performance. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2021, 341: 130039.
Crossref Google Scholar
[95]
Jiang ZW, Guo Z, Sun B, et al. Highly sensitive and selective butanone sensors based on cerium-doped SnO2 thin films. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2010, 145: 667–673.
Crossref Google Scholar
[96]
Tian YC, Xu DP, Liu C, et al. Sea urchin-like mesoporous WO3 (SUS-WO3) for sensitive 3-hydroxy-2-butanone biomarker detection. Mater Sci Semicon Proc 2022, 137: 106160.
Crossref Google Scholar
[97]
Yuan ZY, Yang C, Li YD, et al. ppb-level 2-butanone gas sensor based on CTAB-assisted synthesis of small-size ZnSnO nano cube. IEEE Sens J 2022, 22: 20156–20164.
Crossref Google Scholar
[98]
Zhu HM, Qin WB, Yuan ZY, et al. ppb-level butanone sensor based on porous spherical NiO and the influence of silver modification. Chin J Anal Chem 2022, 50: 100034.
Crossref Google Scholar
[99]
Hu JY, Chen XQ, Zhang Y. Batch fabrication of formaldehyde sensors based on LaFeO3 thin film with ppb-level detection limit. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2021, 349: 130738.
Crossref Google Scholar
[100]
Fuchs P, Loeseken C, Schubert JK, et al. Breath gas aldehydes as biomarkers of lung cancer. Int J Cancer 2010, 126: 2663–2670.
Crossref Google Scholar
[101]
Lou CM, Lei GL, Liu XH, et al. Design and optimization strategies of metal oxide semiconductor nanostructures for advanced formaldehyde sensors. Coordin Chem Rev 2022, 452: 214280.
Crossref Google Scholar
[102]
Xiao CL, Zhang XH, Ma ZZ, et al. Formaldehyde gas sensor with 1 ppb detection limit based on In-doped LaFeO3 porous structure. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2022, 371: 132558.
Crossref Google Scholar
[103]
Li GJ, Cheng ZX, Xiang Q, et al. Bimetal PdAu decorated SnO2 nanosheets based gas sensor with temperature-dependent dual selectivity for detecting formaldehyde and acetone. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2019, 283: 590–601.
Crossref Google Scholar
[104]
Niu JS, Liu IP, Pan YL, et al. Study of a formaldehyde gas sensor based on a sputtered vanadium pentoxide thin film decorated with gold nanoparticles. ECS J Solid State Sc 2021, 10: 087001.
Crossref Google Scholar
[105]
Lou CM, Yang C, Zheng W, et al. Atomic layer deposition of ZnO on SnO2 nanospheres for enhanced formaldehyde detection. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2021, 329: 129218.
Crossref Google Scholar
[106]
Yang K, Ma JZ, Qiao XK, et al. Hierarchical porous LaFeO3 nanostructure for efficient trace detection of formaldehyde. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2020, 313: 128022.
Crossref Google Scholar
[107]
Deng H, Li HR, Wang F, et al. A high sensitive and low detection limit of formaldehyde gas sensor based on hierarchical flower-like CuO nanostructure fabricated by sol–gel method. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 2016, 27: 6766–6772.
Crossref Google Scholar
[108]
Park HJ, Choi NJ, Kang H, et al. A ppb-level formaldehyde gas sensor based on CuO nanocubes prepared using a polyol process. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2014, 203: 282–288.
Crossref Google Scholar
[109]
Wang J, Jiang L, Zhao LJ, et al. Mixed potential type ppb-level acetaldehyde gas sensor based on stabilized zirconia electrolyte and a NiTiO3 sensing electrode. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2020, 320: 128329.
Crossref Google Scholar
[110]
Han BQ, Wang HR, Yang WY, et al. Hierarchical Pt-decorated In2O3 microspheres with highly enhanced isoprene sensing properties. Ceram Int 2021, 47: 9477–9485.
Crossref Google Scholar
[111]
Chen QF, Chen Z, Liu D, et al. Constructing an E-nose using metal-ion-induced assembly of graphene oxide for diagnosis of lung cancer via exhaled breath. ACS Appl Mater Inter 2020, 12: 17713–17724.
Crossref Google Scholar
[112]
Kononov A, Korotetsky B, Jahatspanian I, et al. Online breath analysis using metal oxide semiconductor sensors (electronic nose) for diagnosis of lung cancer. J Breath Res 2019, 14: 016004.
Crossref Google Scholar
[113]
Chang JE, Lee DS, Ban SW, et al. Analysis of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath for lung cancer diagnosis using a sensor system. Sens Actuat B-Chem 2018, 255: 800–807.
Crossref Google Scholar
[114]
Li W, Liu HY, Xie DD, et al. Lung cancer screening based on type-different sensor arrays. Sci Rep 2017, 7: 1969.
Crossref Google Scholar
[115]
Zhao QN, Jiang YD, Duan ZH, et al. A Nb2CTx/sodium alginate-based composite film with neuron-like network for self-powered humidity sensing. Chem Eng J 2022, 438: 135588.
Crossref Google Scholar
[116]
Duan ZH, Yuan Z, Jiang YD, et al. Power generation humidity sensor based on primary battery structure. Chem Eng J 2022, 446: 136910.
Crossref Google Scholar
[117]
Xue XY, Nie YX, He B, et al. Surface free-carrier screening effect on the output of a ZnO nanowire nanogenerator and its potential as a self-powered active gas sensor. Nanotechnology 2013, 24: 225501.
Crossref Google Scholar
[118]
Wang PL, Deng P, Nie YX, et al. Synthesis of CdS nanorod arrays and their applications in flexible piezo-driven active H2S sensors. Nanotechnology 2014, 25: 075501.
Crossref Google Scholar
[119]
Nie YX, Deng P, Zhao YY, et al. The conversion of PN-junction influencing the piezoelectric output of a CuO/ZnO nanoarray nanogenerator and its application as a room-temperature self-powered active H2S sensor. Nanotechnology 2014, 25: 265501.
Crossref Google Scholar
[120]
Zhang DZ, Yang ZM, Li P, et al. Flexible self-powered high-performance ammonia sensor based on Au-decorated MoSe2 nanoflowers driven by single layer MoS2-flake piezoelectric nanogenerator. Nano Energy 2019, 65: 103974.
Crossref Google Scholar
[121]
Liu BH, Libanori A, Zhou YH, et al. Simultaneous biomechanical and biochemical monitoring for self-powered breath analysis. ACS Appl Mater Inter 2022, 14: 7301–7310.
Crossref Google Scholar
[122]
Liu BH, Wang S, Yuan Z, et al. Novel chitosan/ZnO bilayer film with enhanced humidity-tolerant property: Endowing triboelectric nanogenerator with acetone analysis capability. Nano Energy 2020, 78: 105256.
Crossref Google Scholar
[123]
Wang S, Tai HL, Liu BH, et al. A facile respiration-driven triboelectric nanogenerator for multifunctional respiratory monitoring. Nano Energy 2019, 58: 312–321.
Crossref Google Scholar
[124]
Wang S, Xie GZ, Tai HL, et al. Ultrasensitive flexible self-powered ammonia sensor based on triboelectric nanogenerator at room temperature. Nano Energy 2018, 51: 231–240.
Crossref Google Scholar
Journal of Advanced Ceramics
Volume 12 Issue 2,
February 2023
Pages 207-227
DOI: 10.26599/JAC.2023.9220694
Cite this article:
He X, Chai H, Luo Y, et al. Metal oxide semiconductor gas sensing materials for early lung cancer diagnosis. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2023, 12(2): 207-227. https://doi.org/10.26599/JAC.2023.9220694

4701

Views

1115

Downloads

18

Crossref

19

Web of Science

19

Scopus

2

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 26 July 2022
Revised: 03 November 2022
Accepted: 07 November 2022
Published: 10 January 2023
© The Author(s) 2022.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Return